Monday, April 15th: First Ever Criminal Trial for a Former US President

[SmokingFap]

It’s his personal business, it’s an NDA. The other is, I believe, catch and kill.

You still fail to comprehend that he's not being prosecuted for the NDA. He's being prosecuted for how he accounted for it. Period.

 

[Pad_Foot]

If he were not running for President, at least two of his cases would already be concluded with convictions, including this one.

His lawyer already spent TIME for this crime!

If only he could have been honest about cheating on Melania! Why could he not conceive that the right wing would appreciate him more for his love of women??

 

[SmokingFap]

And Jackie Robinson day!
View attachment 2338875

THANK YOU for bringing something positive to this festering untreated sewage dump, Kitty. Have a great Jackie Robinson Day!

 

[SmokingFap]

View attachment 2338894View attachment 2338893

View attachment 2338896

 

[icanhelp1]

We should make a game on how many useless blurts you're going to make in this thread today due to you wetting yourself from anxiety over Cheeto's trial.

https://www.magic-custom.com/4528-large_product/bonnet-comme-des-fuckdown.jpg

let the process play at least, homie!

Sad commentary from you. What’s sad is Bragg using his prosecutorial discretion to proceed with charges that are not tethered to a specific statute or bootstrapping a charge that has outrun the statute of limitations to a supposed federal charge that even SDNY and the DOJ refused to take up. In the meantime real crime is out of control in his district. It’s pretty sad that NY’s judicial system is banking on a politically motivated jury and an activist judge who controls what’s admissible as evidence and what the jury can or cannot hear.

 

[icanhelp1]

You still fail to comprehend that he's not being prosecuted for the NDA. He's being prosecuted for how he accounted for it. Period.

Cohen is going to try to convince a jury to put Trump in jail for following his legal advice. Bizarro world.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Sad commentary from you. What’s sad is Bragg using his prosecutorial discretion to proceed with charges that are not tethered to a specific statute or bootstrapping a charge that has outrun the statute of limitations to a supposed federal charge that even SDNY and the DOJ refused to take up. In the meantime real crime is out of control in his district. It’s pretty sad that NY’s judicial system is banking on a politically motivated jury and an activist judge who controls what’s admissible as evidence and what the jury can or cannot hear.

I don't know what to tell ya, mayne.

https://y.yarn.co/923c3c6e-7a29-48cc-ac69-42326809be42_text.gif

No more pussyfooting around. No more kicking the can down the road. No more stalling, no more delaying, no more yelling "squirrel."

https://64.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lt8rimTsmq1r4ghkoo1_500.gif

Cheeto said he surrounds himself with the best and brightest. If you don't have faith in his team to win the game, you crying about how unfair you feel the deck is stacked against him every five minutes is not going to make you feel better.

 

[icanhelp1]

I don't know what to tell ya, mayne.

https://y.yarn.co/923c3c6e-7a29-48cc-ac69-42326809be42_text.gif

No more pussyfooting around. No more kicking the can down the road. No more stalling, no more delaying, no more yelling "squirrel."

https://64.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lt8rimTsmq1r4ghkoo1_500.gif

Cheeto said he surrounds himself with the best and brightest. If you don't have faith in his team to win the game, you crying about how unfair you feel the deck is stacked against him every five minutes is not going to make you feel better.

This is about better use of prosecutorial discretion.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Juror questioning will include the following permitted questions:
Have you ever attended a Trump rally?
Have you ever attended any political rally?
Have you ever followed Donald Trump on social media?
Have you ever purchased merchandise from a Donald Trump branded company?
Have you ever posted pro-Trump or anti-Trump comments on ANY message board? (heh)
Do you believe the government is "out to get Trump"?

 

[jaF0]

Are those appropriate questions? Do they also include questions about Joe rallies and 'social' media? ( 'Any' is not specific. )

 

[IrezumiKiss]

This is about better use of prosecutorial discretion.

I acknowledge your feelings about all of this, yes. You'll live.

 

[dmallord]

Cohen is going to try to convince a jury to put Trump in jail for following his legal advice. Bizarro world.

Trump had plenty of experience with NDAs long before Michael Cohen became one of Trump's many attorneys or ex-attorneys. Lawyers of Cohen's ilk act as 'body-lawyers' for Donald and twist the arms of women to keep them quiet. Cohen handled the DNA portion of this, and it went well according to the common practice, as you noted, of using non-disclosure agreements. Out of fear, she says, she was quiet during 2016 election cycle. Cohen then, like so many others, went on to lie for Trump and ultimately perjured himself in the coverup. Those legal experts are serving, have served, or will be tried as a result of those lies in pending cases, assuming justice even gets around to trying them.

Did Cohen advise Trump to make the hush money repayments as an income tax right off?

Trump didn't hire Cohen as a tax consultant. Imagine the mentality of Trump's gloating at that moment: I screwed her, shut 'a Karen' the fuck up, so why shouldn't I write off the expenses as a tax deduction payment to my lawyer for services and get my money's worth out of it? That's how I do business - this is America. I'm allowed to screw with the law and get away with it. It's what I do - screw you, Ms. Justice - I'm Donald J. Trump, and you can't fuck with me.

Bragg and others realized that justice wasn't served and, despite the time limitations, found, as you said, a way to right that wrong. They're applying a novel approach - that's allowed in law. You have to prove that to a jury and that is now in the process of playing out.

Cohen acknowledged he fell under the spell of believing he was protecting the President's rights, as wrong as he was. It took time for his epiphany.

You fret over how unfair the law is being applied in New York. I guess that's a fair thing to ponder. You, of course, do recall that when the Feds were frustrated with trying to convict Al Capone because the witnesses either died or were too afraid to testify, they moved to a novel resolution - got him on income tax evasion. Now, according to your premise, that wasn't fair since they went around the 'system' as they couldn't get Capone for murder and went for tax evasion. In the end, justice removed Capone from the crime business. The important thing here is that Capone, a dangerous 'businessman,' was removed from further acts of violence.

Saying that Trump cannot get a fair trial as this is a 95% Democrat jury pool is a red-herring deflection. Trump deserves no less than a fair shake in the People's Court as well. You sound jaded. New York has millions of citizens to choose from, and you know full well that the pool of jurors cannot be asked about their political affiliations, which party they contributed money to, or similar political questions. Separation of politics from justice - that's the premise.

Good luck with the jury selection process underway today! Popcorn and soda at the ready.

 

[jaF0]

Personally, I wish for a total media blackout, all sources until a verdict.

 

[dmallord]

So, they put the case on the backburner so they could use it during an election cycle. That equates to election interference. Charging a crime for a political advantage and you're OK with that? That's why democrats are a vile crowd. Who's the victim in this case. The campaign finance charge is a misdemeanor that outran the two year statute of limitation. NDAs are commonly used and are rarely prosecuted. If anything should go forward it should be Trump suing Stormy for breach of contract and extortion. If NDAs were prosecuted half the political class would be up on charges.

So, what is Trump's measurement these days? Just political drama and nothing concerning alleged crime?

Should he be able to sue the women he screwed and forced to sign a non-disclosure agreement in return for money to keep quiet if involved a future criminal act? The judges determined the NDA was invalid, right?

Nothing about his immoral behavior and cheating on his wife comes into play for you. No condemnation about that from you?

Just turn this around in your mind as if it were somehow a fair turnabout.

 

[Bray123]

It was heart-warming to see Melania standing by her man at his trial regarding payments made to a whore while she was pregnant.

Oh, she wasn't there. Where's Melania, Donnie?

 

[dmallord]

You still fail to comprehend that he's not being prosecuted for the NDA. He's being prosecuted for how he accounted for it. Period.

I feel assured I Need Help knows the reason Trump is being prosecuted - it doesn't fit Help's narrative, so he opts to obfuscate the matter - normal anti-democrat dialog.

 

[desecration]

The right fires back:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/prosecution-of-trump/

 

[ll74]

The right fires back:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/prosecution-of-trump/

45 could kill someone in Times Square and Tom Fitton would still be defending him.

 

[desecration]

45 could kill someone in Times Square and Tom Fitton would still be defending him.

Probably depends on who he kills. If it's a RINO...

 

[ll74]

Probably depends on who he kills. If it's a RINO...

If 45 is against them (even if he was once supporting them) then they are a RINO.

The definition of RINO has become diminished to anyone disloyal to 45.

 

[desecration]

If 45 is against them (even if he was once supporting them) then they are a RINO.

Sort of, in that if someone goes against them, he accuses them of being RINOs or Swamp creatures. This does not mean he is always wrong. RINOs are the ones who will happily ban abortion while ignoring more serious issues, and I think Trump did a good job of putting them in their place by coming out against a nationwide abortion ban.

 

[ll74]

Sort of, in that if someone goes against them, he accuses them of being RINOs or Swamp creatures. This does not mean he is always wrong. RINOs are the ones who will happily ban abortion while ignoring more serious issues, and I think Trump did a good job of putting them in their place by coming out against a nationwide abortion ban.

There is no "sort of" ...RINO's only "policy" is any opposition to the former President.

No other policy matters. Republicans have solidified that.

 

[desecration]

Republicans have solidified that.

I must disagree here. First, on the idea of Republican unity on anything. Second, on them solidifying anything.

 

[ll74]

I must disagree here. First, on the idea of Republican unity on anything. Second, on them solidifying anything.

You're allowed to be wrong. I don't mind.

 

[TandT69]

EED. Expose this Banana Republic Judicial system for the world to see, Execute ALL who Go against their Oath to the Constitution of the United States of America, Dispose of them after stripping them of their citizenship. Watch close.....NOTHING CAN STOP WHATS COMING!