Does you qanon cunt sister/wife like it when you hog all the meth and go on posting tirades?Another genius in the bunch, you are right there is no such thing as Qanon! You must be a collage grad!I just know Trump, his VP and the top 7 generals of the world have been visiting Fla the last 3 days! Hmmm, wonder what they are up to! NOTHING CAN STOP WHATS COMING! WWG1WGA
A Fox "legal analyst"
I think the prosecution is smart enough to wait out any true MAGA zombies. But there is always that risk, and that's just the way our just a system works.
No one's ever going to change the true Trump zombies. But a couple dozen convictions will seal the deal for all of the independents still on the fence, and all the Republicans who have already said they absolutely will not vote for Trump if he's a convicted felon (I thought I saw that, in recent polling, it was something like 30% of Republicans. That's more than enough.).
Gregg Jarrett has kind of been all over the place over the years. Sometimes he's impartial, rational, and intelligent, others he's just as bad as any of the other MAGA zombies. I've never known what his qualifications were as a "legal analyst", though.
Parroting Donald Trump's political rants does not make you appear impartial on the matter. Your assumption that Joe Biden would be acquitted if he were on trial, while Donald Trump would be found guilty if he were tried on Monday, is conjecture. It is your take on political motives rather than charges filed by the DA. Venting w/o foundation, similar to DJT, everything is seen from the perspective of 'witch-hunting.'
SDNY refused to take up the case. The charge outran the statute of limitations. To make this case Bragg had to bootstrap a federal charge to a misdemeanor charge that outran the statute of limitations. In other words Bragg basically IDENTIFIED the man and found a crime. I find it ironic this supposed crime has a history of several years but yet Bragg decided to now charge during an election cycle. Bragg based his political career on getting Trump much like Letitia James. More weaponization of the justice system. NY criminal justice system is developing a bad reputation pushing legal theory to its breaking point. Then there’s a compromised judge who should recuse himself. The jury pool is 95 % Trump hating democrats. Refusing a change of venue due to biased media coverage and a prejudicial jury pool can hardly be considered a fair trial, we’ll see. Even democrat legal beagles agree this case is pushing the limits of legal precedent. Even if charged and convicted prior convictions result in a fine. This case is so convoluted it makes a mockery of NY’s justice system.
So it’s okay if there is conviction since it is just a fine? Your guy can keep breaking laws as long as it’s not serious…great campaign slogan.
Ask yourself this question, if Trump doesn’t run does this case or trial ever make it to court. The correct answer is no! This trial is politically motivated and timed to take place during the heat of the election cycle. This is once again weaponizing the judicial system to interfere with an election. Bragg should be disbarred. The judge should be thrown off the case for political biases.
If he were not running for President, at least two of his cases would already be concluded with convictions, including this one.
Alina? Is that you?
So, they put the case on the backburner so they could use it during an election cycle. That equates to election interference. Charging a crime for a political advantage and you're OK with that? That's why democrats are a vile crowd. Who's the victim in this case. The campaign finance charge is a misdemeanor that outran the two year statute of limitation. NDAs are commonly used and are rarely prosecuted. If anything should go forward it should be Trump suing Stormy for breach of contract and extortion. If NDAs were prosecuted half the political class would be up on charges.
https://nypost.com/2023/03/23/why-braggs-case-against-trump-is-falling-apart/
Thirty. Four. Felony. Charges.
So you have nothing to worry or bitch about, Alina.
And he paid the money right before his election. That's election interference, right?
It’s his personal business, it’s an NDA. The other is, I believe, catch and kill.And he paid the money right before his election. That's election interference, right?
We should make a game on how many useless blurts you're going to make in this thread today due to you wetting yourself from anxiety over Cheeto's trial.
