The future is dense, walkable cities.

Maybe not in your eyes, but I know you are a serious poser. Dude it's an internet forum. If you don't like what I post pass on by. I have so many of your ass hole cronies on ignore that I never have to deal with again. I can add you to that list if you'd like. Because nothing, and I mean absolutely nothing, you say will stop me from saying whatever I want to on here.
Sir, this is a thread to talk about dense, walkable cities.
 
Car suburbs were a failed experiment from the last century. Forcing people to drive everywhere was great for the oil and car industries, but private cars turned out to be an ecological disaster, not to mention the fact that many American cities were gutted to build car infrastructure. Entire neighborhoods were razed to build highways and parking lots.

The way forward is to redirect public spending on car infrastructure to buses and trains. Convert lanes that are currently used for on-street parking into dedicated bus and bike routes. Bring back streetcars. Impose heavy penalties on careless drivers who kill pedestrians.

It will take decades to undo the damage that the private car has done to American cities, but European and Japanese cities can be used as models for how we can get rid of traffic and make our cities easier to get around in.
sounds like Judge Dredd with the walkable cities there. wasn't that considered a dystopia?
 
True. but are they considered Utopia's? or just small "cities"?
We’re not trying to build a utopia, just more places that are nicer than endless car suburbs and strip malls. LA has lots of lovely walkable pockets—downtown Beverly Hills, Culver City, Santa Monica, Westwood Blvd, Sawtelle Blvd. Tie them together with protected bike lanes and trains and you get a nice place to live and work.
 
We’re not trying to build a utopia, just more places that are nicer than endless car suburbs and strip malls. LA has lots of lovely walkable pockets—downtown Beverly Hills, Culver City, Santa Monica, Westwood Blvd, Sawtelle Blvd. Tie them together with protected bike lanes and trains and you a nice place to live and work.
keep congestion down? plus alot of greenery would help i bet. what about trips to jobs and grocery stores? would those be walking distance for a few items?

don't get me wrong, I like the idea. be more economic and more environmental.
 
keep congestion down? plus alot of greenery would help i bet. what about trips to jobs and grocery stores? would those be walking distance for a few items?

don't get me wrong, I like the idea. be more economic and more environmental.
An electric cargo bike is cheaper than a car. I’d get one to do my weekly grocery shopping right now if they’re was a protected bike lane down Olympic Blvd or Santa Monica Blvd. Currently, cycling on either street is too dangerous.

I already ride the train to work. If I forget something at the supermarket on Sunday there’s a little neighborhood grocery I can walk to.
 
ok, what population number are you looking at for this city? the bigger it is, the bigger the area and biking, etc wouldn't be able to cover it all. so are you gonna build electric trains or monorails all over the city or just the outliers and then have electric public transport to the inner city?
 
ok, what population number are you looking at for this city? the bigger it is, the bigger the area and biking, etc wouldn't be able to cover it all. so are you gonna build electric trains or monorails all over the city or just the outliers and then have electric public transport to the inner city?
Cars are inefficient if a city gets past a few hundred thousand residents. For bigger cities, electric bikes are good for trips from 3-5 miles, and if you need to go further, you walk or bike to the train. But in order to make a really big city work you need housing near transit. Car suburbs can never be efficient. That’s why they’re doomed in the long run. They can’t survive without large government subsidies, and that money is better spent on services that benefit the majority of urban taxpayers.
 
ok, what population number are you looking at for this city? the bigger it is, the bigger the area and biking, etc wouldn't be able to cover it all. so are you gonna build electric trains or monorails all over the city or just the outliers and then have electric public transport to the inner city?

Cities have always and will always come in a wide variety of sizes.

Many many small US cities had streetcar systems in the past. And big cities too of course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_streetcar_systems_in_the_United_States
 
Now you can expect a visit from PETA, too. 😤
PETA...You mean the animal advocacy group that kills THOUSANDS of dogs and cats every year? PETA Euthanizes roughly 70% of all animals it takes in. Approximately 40,000 in its history. I would very much like to see them try to take mine or any of neighbors animals. I don't think it would end well for them.
 
PETA...You mean the animal advocacy group that kills THOUSANDS of dogs and cats every year? PETA Euthanizes roughly 70% of all animals it takes in. Approximately 40,000 in its history. I would very much like to see them try to take mine or any of neighbors animals. I don't think it would end well for them.
Sir, this is a thread to talk about dense, walkable cities.
 
Back
Top