LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

FDA Loses War On Ivermectin

Fuzzy1975 said:
sure it was. You had covid how many times......I've had it zero....oh I'm vaccinated, you're not....
Click to expand...

How do you know? Is there a test you can take and you've always tested negative?

If so, why did you need to get vaxxed?
 
Fuzzy1975 said:
Anyone who needed it could get it.There was just no science behind the claim it was effective against COVID. There still is no evidence....
Click to expand...
I saw the paste at North40 when I was buying dog food last year. Anyone who wanted could buy it. My MAGA father tried it. He was also prescribed hydroxychoroquine by a teledoc 2000 mi away. That could have killed him. No way would his physician agreed to that.
 
HisArpy said:
Gen X marks the spot, often missing the hydrant anyway despite their best effort.

Dribble on dooRmat.
Click to expand...
Now dispute the facts I rammed down that other clown's throat if you have the stones to stay on topic. Otherwise, piss off.
 
Rotadom said:
Now dispute the facts I rammed down that other clown's throat if you have the stones to stay on topic. Otherwise, piss off.
Click to expand...

The topic?

Oh, you mean the one where you continually beclown yourself trying to fool the world into thinking you're intelligent while proving you're not?

THAT topic?
 
HisArpy said:
The topic?

Oh, you mean the one where you continually beclown yourself trying to fool the world into thinking you're intelligent while proving you're not?

THAT topic?
Click to expand...
You poor thing. "Everyone knows!" is funny coming from carbon boy.
 
OlderFitterWiser said:
Look, I'm not wasting time on analysing why I think it's a good idea for the FDA to stop their war on Ivermectin.

The fact was it was restricted most of Europe, despite being a 60 year old noble prize winning drug.

I don't give a damn about us tribal politics, so did prefer if you would just accept the comment for what it was, and stop trying to paint me as a member of one side or the other.
Click to expand...
I only painted you as the uninformed clown you are. I never mentioned your politics.
 

Does ivermectin have a place in the treatment of mild Covid-19?​

Eli Schwartz
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
The Center for Geographic Medicine and Tropical Diseases, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer & Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Eli Schwartz: li.ca.uat.xeuat@awhcsile


Ivermectin has been used to treat humans for the past 4 decades. It was approved as a broad spectrum anti-parasitic agent, initially indicated in 1987 to treat onchocerciasis and was given as a mass drug administration (MDA) in endemic countries. Its success awarded the discoverers the Nobel prize of Medicine in 2015. Ivermectin's principal activity was to treat infections caused by roundworm parasites. Over the years, the spectrum was broadened to include ectoparasites such as scabies among others. Through the years more than 3 billion doses have been given to humans (not to horses) with a high safety profile, and the drug was added to the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines [https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/345533/WHO-MHP-HPS-EML-2021.02-eng.pdf ].

In the last decade, several in-vitro studies have shown its anti-viral activity against a broad range of viruses. At the beginning of the COVID pandemic, ivermectin was tested in vitro against SARS-CoV-2 and showed a highly significant reduction (99.8%) in viral RNA after 48 hours [1], but it was criticized that this was achieved by using a much higher dose in comparison to the standard dose in human use [2]. However, its anti-COVID activity in real-life in patients who were treated with standard dose of 3 days of ivermectin showed the significant reduction in culture viability in the ivermectin group compared to placebo [3]. In addition, ivermectin has anti-inflammatory properties based on in-vitro and in animal model studies. An extensive review of the potential mechanisms of action for ivermectin against COVID-19 was recently published [4].

SARS-CoV-2 infection includes several stages, where the initial stage is manifested by high viral replication followed by the second stage (occurring in the high risk groups mainly) of excessive inflammatory response causing severe disease and death. Therefore, ivermectin may have a dual role in this infection, acting as both an anti-viral and anti-inflammatory agent. With its high safety profile, ivermectin is a potential treatment against COVID-19 in its different stages.

There are already over 80 studies assessing the impact of the drug in the different stages of the disease such as: preventing infection, shortening viral shedding, preventing hospitalization, and death and more [https://ivmmeta.com]. Several reviews and meta-analyses disputing the value of this drug in fighting the COVID pandemic were published with the main argument against using ivermectin being that the level of existing evidence for its positive effect is based mainly on studies lacking a high standard of rigorous methodology [5,6]. One must also consider however that since the drug no longer has rights for patent, pharmaceutical companies have no monetary incentive to conduct clinical trials using this medication, and governmental agencies are reluctant to sponsor trials for drug repurposing.

More here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9135450/

The point of the FDA's action in taking down posts warning against Ivermectin is that despite what they say doctors have a right to prescribe it.
https://justthenews.com/politics-po...covid-19-posts-warning-against-ivermectin-use
 
OlderFitterWiser said:
It always ends up with name calling when you guys lose the argument.

Can you no longer have an intelligent debate

Remember all I said was 'Great News'. And now I have a person working himself up into a fit and calling me names.

Ahh bless you.
Click to expand...
Because it's not great news and this will encourage more idiots to take it rather than doing the right thing.

See? I'm thinking globally 😉
 
Rightguide said:

FDA Loses its War on Ivermectin: Agrees to Remove All Related Social Media Content and Consumer Advisories on Ivermectin Usage for COVID-19​

By Jim Hᴏft Mar. 22, 2024 8:30 am

In December 2021, the FDA warned Americans not to use Ivermectin, which “is intended for animals” to treat or prevent COVID-19.

“Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous,” FDA said at the time.

This was a very controversial statement at the time since the FDA pushed the drug on African migrants back in 2015, and the drug was praised in several scientific journals. There have now been 101 Ivermectin COVID-19 controlled studies that show a 62% lower risk in early treatment in COVID-19 patients.


More here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/fda-loses-its-war-ivermectin-agrees-remove-all/

More proof that Democrats and their media are evil and dangerous to the health and lives of Americans.
Click to expand...
I hope all the MAGA retards continue to pump themselves full of horse dewormer. Especially considering even its manufacturer said from the start that it had no effect on Covid-19.

https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

I think it's hilarious that all the lobotomized MAGA conspiracy theorists scream "do your own research!", when what they actually mean is "find an article from some non-scientist on some right-wing garbage website that says what you want to hear".
 
Last edited:
JoePepsiCo said:
I had Covid long before there was a vaccine. I survived it; exactly like having the flu.
Click to expand...
For some that was the case, for others they died. Having survived COVID without a dose of the vaccine, has nothing to do with the effectiveness of the vaccine.
JoePepsiCo said:
Then again, I don't live in isolation...
Click to expand...
What does where a person lives matter?
JoePepsiCo said:
:(of

The elderly die every year of the flu; protect yourself with even more isolation so your wit is not lost on Lit.
Click to expand...
The elderly die everyday, so do the young and middle age. The point of debate is dying unnecessarily of something for which a treatment/prevention exists.

My hope is you get covid again ( which you will) and you don't survive. You bring nothing to the world.
 
OlderFitterWiser said:
Stop will ya, it was demonized in the media and pulled off the shelves.

Stop making excuses for something that's getting harder to excuse.
Click to expand...
Stop what? The FDA recommendation for treatment of COVID doesn't include Ivermectin. It didn't in 2021 and it doesn't in 2024.
 
Dipshits don't get that ivermectin doesn't work.

This ruling didn't reveal that it did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
Judicial Bombshell
Replies
9
Views
292
ll74
ll74
B
Syria’s new regime watches the Iran-Israel war from the sidelines
Replies
1
Views
122
Politruk
P
SkyBubble
Democrats Pretend to Be for Free Speech: NOPE
2 3
Replies
57
Views
766
Bray123
B
P
Elon Musk Has Conflict of Interest at Over 70% of DOGE’s Targets
Replies
1
Views
159
Politruk
P
RobDownSouth
Trump Administration Declares Yet Another War! This Time On.....Prozac Nation?
Replies
21
Views
480
Rightguide
Rightguide
Back
Top