Will you vote for Trump?

We're showing progress as a country if Deplorables are only comfortable admitting their allegiances via alts in an anonymous venue.

Keep the pain coming. Make them hurt. 😎
Yes, your feathered boas are so formidable.:rolleyes:
 
We're showing progress as a country if Deplorables are only comfortable admitting their allegiances via alts in an anonymous venue.
Can we then suppose then that you presenting as a judgmental bitch dog in both manner and image is the real you admitting your allegiances?
 
Have any of you listened to any of his speeches lately?
So then you have no issue with his speech issues? Forgetting words, misnaming his wife, forgetting his family members, slurring words, sweating profusely, confusing events, confusing places, confusing people?

If you have heard "all his speeches" then you should be aware of and okay with these.

You are saying you have no problem with his continual slurring of words, confusions and word mix ups which happen all throughout the entirety of his recent speeches.

Adrina thinks about Trump and then itemizes Biden's distinct faults. Trump kept his promises, Joe can't remember his. Americans care more about actions than words.
 
Calling for a “complete tear-down” is lazy. If you want to make major changes to the system say what should be changed and why. For example, I think Presidential elections would be more democratic if the number of electoral votes from each state was equal to its representation in the House. Adding in 2 Senators gives unfair power to small states.
You need to go back to a real school.
 
Adrina thinks about Trump and then itemizes Biden's distinct faults. Trump kept his promises, Joe can't remember his. Americans care more about actions than words.

What stated promises did Cheeto keep? Make a list of them if you can.

by the way, here's one of the actions he was hoping to do that even Hannity had to chair-squirm about:

 
I’m still not hearing why. Why do we need to keep Russia in check? Why do we care about Europe?
putin aggressively desires to expand, expand, expand. this isn't news, hyperbole, or hallucination. It is clear that he has no intention of stopping after Ukraine, but plans on pushing further into Europe, with Poland in his sights. Why do you think NATO came into being?

Europeans tend to get news coverage/education about what goes on in the rest of the world; since moving to the States i've found the coverage of world events largely absent. The Ukraine and Israel/Palestine issues have been covered more, but in general American news is largely all about America. This translates as a whole lot of Americans seeing themselves as of importance above and beyond the rest of the world...it places them apart. In a world war, all nations need allies, and unless you are of this weird belief that the USA can remain aloof and independent from the rest of a world in conflict you should be able to see quite clearly that Russia, under putin, would see the USA under its control. If it can do it without bloodshed, through the auspices of the useful idiots (trump/tucker carlson, all the others) and election interference, it will, but the end result will be the same. putin wants control over the USA.

For every country NATO allows him to assimilate through aggression, the stronger he becomes and the bigger his intentions bloom. Unchecked, he WILL attack NATO countries—the one reason trump is so keen to walk away from NATO.
Allowing putin to drag the world into another world war will cost the USA far more than $40B and place American lives directly in threat from him unless the USA falls into place UNDER putin, ruled by him directly or indirectly.

It is naive at best to think the USA would be 'safe, independent and still "American"' in a world where putin's power had been allowed to grow unchecked. At worst, it indicates a person's thinking fell in line with putin's as to race/religion/gender/political creeds.
 
putin aggressively desires to expand, expand, expand. this isn't news, hyperbole, or hallucination. It is clear that he has no intention of stopping after Ukraine, but plans on pushing further into Europe, with Poland in his sights. Why do you think NATO came into being?

Europeans tend to get news coverage/education about what goes on in the rest of the world; since moving to the States i've found the coverage of world events largely absent. The Ukraine and Israel/Palestine issues have been covered more, but in general American news is largely all about America. This translates as a whole lot of Americans seeing themselves as of importance above and beyond the rest of the world...it places them apart. In a world war, all nations need allies, and unless you are of this weird belief that the USA can remain aloof and independent from the rest of a world in conflict you should be able to see quite clearly that Russia, under putin, would see the USA under its control. If it can do it without bloodshed, through the auspices of the useful idiots (trump/tucker carlson, all the others) and election interference, it will, but the end result will be the same. putin wants control over the USA.

For every country NATO allows him to assimilate through aggression, the stronger he becomes and the bigger his intentions bloom. Unchecked, he WILL attack NATO countries—the one reason trump is so keen to walk away from NATO.
Allowing putin to drag the world into another world war will cost the USA far more than $40B and place American lives directly in threat from him unless the USA falls into place UNDER putin, ruled by him directly or indirectly.

It is naive at best to think the USA would be 'safe, independent and still "American"' in a world where putin's power had been allowed to grow unchecked. At worst, it indicates a person's thinking fell in line with putin's as to race/religion/gender/political creeds.
thank you for bringing this to light. we have lived abroad for a number of years and could not agree more with your comment.
 
Why is Zelensky’s aggressive panhandling not a valid point?
Zelensky's not panhandling, he's fucking begging, and you blame him? His country has been aggressively attacked, his citizens killed.
Maybe try putting yourself in his shoes. What else can he do? Just let Russia come and take over Ukraine? Well if you think like that, you'd be fine with Russia taking over Poland I'd guess. Maybe Finland or Norway? Where exactly do you think the line should be?
Y Btw why aren’t we involved with assisting our equally decrepit African counterparts with “fighting for democracy” in those countries? While we are at it perhaps we can help the Indonesians and the Malaysians who are also fighting radical Islamic ideologies there?
Nice goalpost move, but you have a valid point. We should be doing more there.
I will do my best to put forth a coherent argument why it’s not in our best interests to be putting money in everyone’s hands except the people who need it the most in America instead.
I'd like to see that. Why do you think the collective west can't do both. Myself I am 100% in favour of my country's donations of equipment,money, and materials. I also donate myself directly to Ukraine. Hell if I was half my age I might even have gone to fight Russia in Ukraine. So yes, I'd love to read your reasons.
But what’s the point? You will just refuse to accept my view and use popular words like democracy to defend your position.
Democracy is worth defending, wherever and whenever. But I'll offer a caveat, there have been times in the past where defending Democracy was used as the excuse to send troops and people died. So I can understand and do see why people are objecting, yet Ukraine is not an excuse used for support. They need the support.
This was and is a fool’s errand to begin with.
What was? Posting on the PB? Yah maybe, but sometimes ideas are shared that matter,and sometimes people change their view.
 
i wonder why 'nicefella' imagines the USA has so many military bases in other countries
 
No. Please do tell me.
Europe stumbled into WWI. They expected a short, limited conflict like the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, but technological advances had changed the nature of battle. Most of the powers thought they could gain a little advantage over their rivals if they went to war, so they jumped on a minor terrorist attack in the Balkans as a convenient pretext to declare war. The result was a huge bloodbath.

WWII was caused by the Nazis. Hitler wanted to grab land to the east to build a greater German empire. Stalin let him on the condition that the Soviet Union could take a chunk of Eastern Europe for themselves but that was merely a trick to set Russia up for a German invasion. Fascist Italy had imperial ambitions as well, but they were minor compared to Hitler's grand plan.

The war in the Pacific is more complicated. Japan was militaristic, but not fascist. They hoped to take advantage of the chaos in Europe to replace the colonial powers with a pan-Asian Union. They knew they couldn't win a long war against the U.S., but gambled that America didn't have the will to fight, and would back down after being defeated at Pearl Harbor. They lost that gamble.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top