LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

No Immunity for Inmate No. P01135809

Think of all the things Biden could do with immunity. It would be quite a stretch for Alito and Thomas to convince the rest of the Supreme Court justices that only Republican Presidents would have this immunity.

I think this is a dead issue. The Appeals Court stated the obvious. If Roberts has any sense of his historical legacy, he will not get SCOTUS involved.
 
I expect a 7-2 vote. I believe Roberts may, may, try to convince everyone that SCOTUS needs to show a definitive 9-0 decision but Alito & Thomas just have no more F’s to give and are too far gone. They answer to no one - not Roberts, not the Senate, and certainly not the American people. A dissenting vote by them is to their own benefit, signaling to the interests willing to line their pockets that they can and will find a justification to twist themselves for those interests. In a functioning court, it actually should be 8-0 with a Thomas recusal. In my utopia, the vote would 5-0 - counting Thomas and the 3 trump appointees also recusing.
 
Last edited:
coati said:
Think of all the things Biden could do with immunity. It would be quite a stretch for Alito and Thomas to convince the rest of the Supreme Court justices that only Republican Presidents would have this immunity.

I think this is a dead issue. The Appeals Court stated the obvious. If Roberts has any sense of his historical legacy, he will not get SCOTUS involved.
Click to expand...
It's not Roberts decision to make. That said, I doubt SCOTUS will take his appeal. The circuit court's opinion was comprehensive.
 
trump was arguing that a president cannot be held legally liable for anything 'criminal' he does not only DURING their presidency but also afterwards...for life.

that cannot float.

as for his words saying a president MUST have such immunity or else 'every president will be charged as a criminal' as soon as they leave office by 'the other side' sounds like his notion of a threat/plan for his senate/h.o.r buddies to act upon.
 
bijedi said:
It's not Roberts decision to make.
Click to expand...
Roberts ran interference for Thomas's ethical violations. He does have influence.

Trump's legal assertion is absurd. Not taking the case will give the justices a way out of that absurdity.
 
I have less faith in the Supreme Court than y’all. They’ve already demonstrated that they’re willing to make rulings with little to no legal foundation.

My prediction is they’ll give Trump anything he wants.
 
bijedi said:
It's not Roberts decision to make. That said, I doubt SCOTUS will take his appeal. The circuit court's opinion was comprehensive.
Click to expand...

But Derpy Mason, the Lit PB’s resident legal expert, offered a dissenting opinion, so…

😑

👉 Derpy Mason 🤣

🇺🇸
 
MajorRewrite said:
I have less faith in the Supreme Court than y’all. They’ve already demonstrated that they’re willing to make rulings with little to no legal foundation.

My prediction is they’ll give Trump anything he wants.
Click to expand...
I think they'll fall on the side of not being able to conclude he's been involved in an insurrection (which, of course he has) without due process. That at least is an arguable position.

They've ruled against him several times before--and quite likely are to do so in the immunity issue--so it isn't really giving Trump anything he wants.
 
Read the full ruling linked in the other thead. They sorta kinda lay the foundation that he did.
 
What did he need immunity from? I thought he did nothing wrong.?
 
BabyBoomer50s said:
The trial is not going to happen in March. Summer at the absolute earliest but even that timeframe looks doubtful.

https://x.com/jonathanturley/status/1754888658551755219?s=46&t=D4wPadUSm31flBzHVSwUxA
Click to expand...
^
(Quotes for posterity and hypocrisy)

For certain "reasons", BabyBoobs seems reeeeeaally invested in the political calendar; and the hypocritical POS is apparently delighting in the prospect of the corrupt orange traitor successfully delaying the trial until after the election.

🤔

👉 BabyBoobs 🤣

🇺🇸
 
Lazaran said:
^
(Quotes for posterity and hypocrisy)

For certain "reasons", BabyBoobs seems reeeeeaally invested in the political calendar; and the hypocritical POS is apparently delighting in the prospect of the corrupt orange traitor successfully delaying the trial until after the election.

🤔

👉 BabyBoobs 🤣

🇺🇸
Click to expand...

Do you seriously think there will be a trial in March? If not, when do you think a trial will begin?
 
So we have until Feb 12 for 45 to submit application for a stay to the DC ruling.

Without a stay, the case will move ahead. Even while SCOTUS considers any appeal.
 
Have ANY of you read the ruling I linked in the other thread?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

adrina
John Roberts put a thumb on the Trump Immunity Ruling scale
2 3
Replies
60
Views
2K
domroger
domroger
Rightguide
Supreme Court Takes Trump's Immunity Claims
4 5 6
Replies
145
Views
5K
Fuzzy1975
F
Rightguide
Techno-Fog On Jack Smith
2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
HisArpy
HisArpy
jaF0
Are Alito's Comments grounds for Impeachment?
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
YDB95
YDB95
Rotadom
Police officers sue Donald Trump for injuries resulting from Capitol riot
Replies
15
Views
1K
YDB95
YDB95
Back
Top