Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
1. When and where did the actor say this, specifically?
2. Why is this quote important to you?
Golly look who is questioning my post again.

1) Don't know, don't care.
2) Why is it so important to you to stalk my every post and comment on them?

I've told you many times if you don't like what I post to just pass me by. You aren't a sight owner, admin, or moderator, so I don't have to explain anything to you. Have a tyrannical day fooling yourself into believing you have power here.
 
Golly look who is questioning my post again.

1) Don't know, don't care.
2) Why is it so important to you to stalk my every post and comment on them?

I've told you many times if you don't like what I post to just pass me by. You aren't a sight owner, admin, or moderator, so I don't have to explain anything to you. Have a tyrannical day fooling yourself into believing you have power here.
Sorry a couple of questions trigger you.

I'm just curious why you posted this.

Fyi - I rarely post on your stuff.
 
Last edited:
Because I can and I want to. It's fun to see what triggers you to respond.
So first response -> "why are you stalking my posts?"

Second response -> "I do things specifically to trigger you to respond"

Neat.

Sidenote: there's no evidence Jones ever said that.
 
Last edited:
Okay, so noted.


I broached the subject. She seemed less than thrilled. "Why do I want to do this?" "Because I want the brass." "What's brass?" "The stuff you pick up after I've been shooting in the pasture - so Baby Poodle doesn't swallow it or whatever." "Oh . . . ."


"Why do we want more???"


:rolleyes:


:ROFLMAO: :nana:
It's a long term investment. :D
 
So first response -> "why are you stalking my posts?"

Second response -> "I do things specifically to trigger you to respond"

Neat.

Sidenote: there's no evidence Jones ever said that.
Just another day rent free in your tiny little brain.
 
Last edited:
Why does it matter? The truth of what he said is codified in American law as we speak.
That is a good question. Why does it matter? Why specifically was that meme created and why did he post it?
 
Why does it matter? The truth of what he said is codified in American law as we speak.
The only decent people I have seen lose are those 108 children killed and 168 wounded in school shootings. Oh and the 300,000 or so who have had to try and get an education, while worrying about being shot while doing so.
 
Tell me I’m wrong about this guy’s unique and insufferable superpower?
The conversation could easily have been about the epistemology of nuclear photosynthesis dihadron azimuthal angular correlations and this buffoon wound’ve made it into a cryfest about himself in less than 2 sentences.

I luvsya TH.
Keep scouring the intranets - you may one day find a quote from Charlton Heston that encompasses the feelings of both sides here.
 
That is a good question. Why does it matter? Why specifically was that meme created and why did he post it?
Well, since I answered this already and you are apparently too fucking stupid to understand I will post my answer again with some additional comments.

1) Don't know, don't care.
2) Why is it so important to you to stalk my every post and comment on them?

Here's number 3 for you: Because you are so very fucking easy to trigger that it makes me laugh. A meme has got you so worked up you have to repeatedly post about it. Geezus you are a whiney bitch.
 
Well, since I answered this already and you are apparently too fucking stupid to understand I will post my answer again with some additional comments.

1) Don't know, don't care.
2) Why is it so important to you to stalk my every post and comment on them?

Here's number 3 for you: Because you are so very fucking easy to trigger that it makes me laugh. A meme has got you so worked up you have to repeatedly post about it. Geezus you are a whiney bitch.
In whose head again? I was asking ReichGad. You already deflected the questions and blamed me for asking.
 
A bit of curiosity turned up some interesting tidbits:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56×45mm_NATO


Robert Hutton (technical editor of Guns & Ammo magazine) started development of a powder load to reach the 3,300 ft/s (1,006 m/s) goal. He used DuPont IMR4198, IMR3031, and an Olin powder to work up loads. Testing was done with a Remington 722 rifle with a 22-inch Apex barrel. During a public demonstration, the round successfully penetrated the U.S. steel helmet as required. But testing showed chamber pressures to be excessively high.[5][11]

Stoner contacted both Winchester and Remington about increasing the case capacity. Remington created a larger cartridge called the ".222 Special", which was loaded with DuPont IMR4475 powder.[5] During parallel testing of the T44E4 (future M14) and the AR-15 in 1958, the T44E4 experienced 16 failures per 1,000 rounds fired compared to 6.1 for the AR-15.[5]

Due to several different .222 caliber cartridges being developed for the SCHV project, the 222 Special was renamed .223 Remington in 1959. In May of that year, a report was produced stating that five- to seven-man squads armed with AR-15 rifles had higher hit probabilities than 11-man squads armed with M-14 rifles. At a 4th of July picnic, Air Force General Curtis LeMay fired an AR-15 and was very impressed with it. He ordered a number of them to replace M2 carbines that were in use by the Air Force. By November, testing at Aberdeen Proving Ground showed that the AR-15 failure rate had declined to 2.5 failures per 1,000 rounds, resulting in the M-16 being approved for Air Force Trials.
[5]


There is little new save unknown history.
 
In whose head again? I was asking ReichGad. You already deflected the questions and blamed me for asking.
Still posting about me. I'm sorry your pitiful, unfulfilled, life is so sad and empty that you need me to make you feel alive. It's hilarious. I own you. I am your reason for waking up just so you can see what I post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top