Trump Civil case may Be Over

Your problem is you think any federal regulations whatsoever are "totalitarian".

This may be true BUT when the government exceeds its authority there's a problem. Worse, when the government does it, and states publicly that they know it's probably not legal but does it anyway, there's an even bigger problem.

And yet here you are supporting that same government and its unlawful actions while simultaneously trying to convince everyone that it's all good.

So it's not how conservatives feel about the existence of governmental tyranny, it's about you defending it while claiming that it's conservatives who are the problem.
 
I think you may have me on ignore, but just wanted to say that it would help your case to provide credible links supporting your assertions.

For the most part I do have you on ignore. Many of your posts are ignorant and you attempt to defend them with more ignorance in the face of truth. You (and others) attempt to use ridicule as both a shield to hide your ignorance and as a sword to vilify those who point out the errors of your posts.

However, because I'm feeling magnanimous today, you should read the US Supreme Court decision in Heller v. District of Columbia, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) where the court said:

There seems to us no doubt, on the basis of both text and history, that the Second Amendment conferred an individual right to keep and bear arms.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html

That quote comes from the actual US Supreme Court decision. The link in the quote goes to the text of that decision.

Educate yourself BEFORE you speak because it's not my job to hold your hand and lead you through life.
 
Heller v District of Columbia is settled law and there are no plans to revisit it.

That sounds vaguely familiar.
 
For the most part I do have you on ignore. Many of your posts are ignorant and you attempt to defend them with more ignorance in the face of truth. You (and others) attempt to use ridicule as both a shield to hide your ignorance and as a sword to vilify those who point out the errors of your posts.

However, because I'm feeling magnanimous today, you should read the US Supreme Court decision in Heller v. District of Columbia, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) where the court said:



That quote comes from the actual US Supreme Court decision. The link in the quote goes to the text of that decision.

Educate yourself BEFORE you speak because it's not my job to hold your hand and lead you through life.
Biden’s use of parole to facilitate asylum releases is a perfect example of an agency operating outside its purview. Wray just testified that he sees terrorism blinking lights everywhere , wherever he turns and yet DHS still has their heads up their asses.
 
For the most part I do have you on ignore. Many of your posts are ignorant and you attempt to defend them with more ignorance in the face of truth. You (and others) attempt to use ridicule as both a shield to hide your ignorance and as a sword to vilify those who point out the errors of your posts.
Im sure you believe that. Which proves you, like Rightguide, lack a shred of self-awareness. Amazing.

However, because I'm feeling magnanimous today, you should read the US Supreme Court decision in Heller v. District of Columbia, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) where the court said:

That quote comes from the actual US Supreme Court decision. The link in the quote goes to the text of that decision.
Thank you.

Educate yourself BEFORE you speak because it's not my job to hold your hand and lead you through life.
1) You should take your own advice, and 2) no one asked you to.
 
Biden’s use of parole to facilitate asylum releases is a perfect example of an agency operating outside its purview. Wray just testified that he sees terrorism blinking lights everywhere , wherever he turns and yet DHS still has their heads up their asses.

DHS is doing exactly what they've been tasked to do - allow unvetted and unmonitored illegal entry into the interior of the nation.

The purpose for this is clear and twofold. 1. To justify their existence. 2. To allow violence against the people to make the people afraid and therefore convey more power to DHS and the Government at the expense of liberty and Constitutional Rights.

Basically, DHS/FBI/DOJ have colluded to overthrow the government of the US and usurp the powers and privileges of the people for their own benefit.

Every freaking one of those involved should be tried and, if convicted, publicly hanged.
 
DHS is doing exactly what they've been tasked to do - allow unvetted and unmonitored illegal entry into the interior of the nation.

The purpose for this is clear and twofold. 1. To justify their existence. 2. To allow violence against the people to make the people afraid and therefore convey more power to DHS and the Government at the expense of liberty and Constitutional Rights.

Basically, DHS/FBI/DOJ have colluded to overthrow the government of the US and usurp the powers and privileges of the people for their own benefit.

Every freaking one of those involved should be tried and, if convicted, publicly hanged.
Just more rambling paranoid nonsense. You seem to imply that they are deliberatly allowing armed immigrants into the U.S with the express purpose of encouraging them to commit crimes- so that DHS and the FBI can crack down and take away more of our freedoms in some twisted power grab.

For fuck sake, Do you really BELIEVE half the bullshit you write?

Meanwhile Trump has expressly said out loud that he wants to take away freedom of the press and incarcerate anyone who disagrees with him. Along with GLBT rights and women's rights. And oddly enough, you don't seem to have a problem with this at all!
 
Just more rambling paranoid nonsense. You seem to imply that they are deliberatly allowing armed immigrants into the U.S with the express purpose of encouraging them to commit crimes- so that DHS and the FBI can crack down and take away more of our freedoms in some twisted power grab.

For fuck sake, Do you really BELIEVE half the bullshit you write?

Meanwhile Trump has expressly said out loud that he wants to take away freedom of the press and incarcerate anyone who disagrees with him. Along with GLBT rights and women's rights. And oddly enough, you don't seem to have a problem with this at all!

The media has been on the job 24/7 showing images of hoards of migrants crossing the border. DHS provides data and hard numbers proving that they're just releasing hundrds of thousands of migrants into the US without even a court date in some cases. BP cuts the razor wire Texas installed to try to curb the inflow. BP uses forklifts to raise the razor wire to allow migrants to cross underneath. Many of the migrants are single adult males from multiple countries which are socially and politically adverse to our way of life.

Crime stats prove that many of these migrants aren't obeying the law and some of them are about the most violent people possible. Yet, after being caught, they're STILL NOT DEPORTED in some cases.

On top of that, Biden and his administration insist that "the border is secure" when it is obviously not.

So, DO NOT try to tell us that DHS isn't doing exactly what it was told to do. If it wasn't then the administration would ensure that DHS stopped. The administration would obey the court's orders and stop. And finally, the men and women of the BP wouldn't be doing what they're doing to try and circumvent the efforts by Texas and Arizona and Florida to stop the illegal migrant crossings.
 
NAZI: National Socialist German Worker's Party.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Nazi-Party

You stupid son of a bitch. Too fucking stupid to post in my threads.
Reichguide it’s good to see you using sources other than the gateway pundit.

And I think we can all agree britannica is an authoritative source.

I wonder if upon you browsing there you came across the following couple of entries?:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics

Insurrection.
Insurrections and other acts of violence against governments by their own citizens or subjects (some of which are not clearly distinguishable from revolutions, coups d’état, civil wars, or resistance to foreign rule) are commonplace in world history. Among many historically significant insurrections of the 20th and 21st centuries are the March on Rome of 1922, which brought Benito Mussoliniand his National Fascist Party to power in Italy; the July Plot against Adolf Hitlerin 1944; the briefly successful Hungarian Revolution of 1956; the student revolt in Paris in May 1968; the Zapatistarebellion in Mexico beginning in 1994; and the United States Capitol attack of January 2021.


https://www.britannica.com/event/January-6-U-S-Capitol-attack

Jan 6th 2021.
January 6 U.S. Capitol attack, storming of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, by a mob of supporters of Republican Pres. Donald J. Trump. The attack disrupted a joint session of Congress convened to certify the results of the presidential election of 2020, which Trump had lost to his Democraticopponent, Joe Biden. Because its object was to prevent alegitimate president-elect from assuming office, the attack was widely regarded as an insurrection or attempted coup d’état. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and other law-enforcement agencies also considered it an act of domesticterrorism. For having given a speech before the attack in which he encouraged a large crowd of his supporters near the White House to march to the Capitol and violently resist Congress’s certification of Biden’s victory—which many in the crowd then did—Trump was impeachedby the Democratic-led House of Representatives for “incitement of insurrection” (he was subsequently acquitted by the Senate).
 
Last edited:
Reichguide it’s good to see you using sources other than the gateway pundit.

And I think we can all agree britannica is an authoritative source.

I wonder if upon you browsing there you came across the following couple of entries?:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/insurrection-politics

Insurrections and other acts of violence against governments by their own citizens or subjects (some of which are not clearly distinguishable from revolutions, coups d’état, civil wars, or resistance to foreign rule) are commonplace in world history. Among many historically significant insurrections of the 20th and 21st centuries are the March on Rome of 1922, which brought Benito Mussoliniand his National Fascist Party to power in Italy; the July Plot against Adolf Hitlerin 1944; the briefly successful Hungarian Revolution of 1956; the student revolt in Paris in May 1968; the Zapatistarebellion in Mexico beginning in 1994; and the United States Capitol attack of January 2021.


https://www.britannica.com/event/January-6-U-S-Capitol-attack

January 6 U.S. Capitol attack, storming of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, by a mob of supporters of Republican Pres. Donald J. Trump. The attack disrupted a joint session of Congress convened to certify the results of the presidential election of 2020, which Trump had lost to his Democraticopponent, Joe Biden. Because its object was to prevent alegitimate president-elect from assuming office, the attack was widely regarded as an insurrection or attempted coup d’état. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and other law-enforcement agencies also considered it an act of domesticterrorism. For having given a speech before the attack in which he encouraged a large crowd of his supporters near the White House to march to the Capitol and violently resist Congress’s certification of Biden’s victory—which many in the crowd then did—Trump was impeachedby the Democratic-led House of Representatives for “incitement of insurrection” (he was subsequently acquitted by the Senate).
The same democrats that regarded J/6 an insurrection are the same democrats that regarded the Floyd riots of 2020 as peaceful protest. Democrats lack self awareness, they are one evil party.
 
The same democrats that regarded J/6 an insurrection are the same democrats that regarded the Floyd riots of 2020 as peaceful protest. Democrats lack self awareness, they are one evil party.
Amen, brother. J6 was nothing more than sightseers out for a stroll.
 
If Trump said that then you should probably quote Trump instead of just using your own words to say it.... Direct quotes are a lot more convincing.
At this point anyone who follows politics knows that Trump has called freedom of the press “disgusting” and said the press is “the enemy of the people”. We all know he’s against free speech.
 
The same democrats that regarded J/6 an insurrection are the same democrats that regarded the Floyd riots of 2020 as peaceful protest. Democrats lack self awareness, they are one evil party.
^
(Quoted for posterity and stupidity).

ineedhelp1 can’t seem to differentiate (decent, intelligent people can) between the 93% (that’s almost all, ineedhelp1) of COMPLETELY PEACEFUL AND LEGITIMATE anti police brutality protests in the name of the recently murdered George Floyd, etc, in over 20000 CITIES around the nation, VS the 7% that turned violent or destructive for various reasons, VS THE ONE AND ONLY ILLEGITIMATE VIOLENT INSURRECTION ATTEMPT AT THE U.S. CAPITOL, BASED ON THE LOSER’S "STOLEN ELECTION"I LIES.

🙄

👉 ineedhelp1 🤣

🇺🇸
 
I know. But I believe in snuffing out lies like this wherever we see them.
You haven't snuffed out anything the link supplied to my post snuffs pout all of your left-wing propaganda regarding Hitler and Socialism.
 
Hitler was not a socialist. He was an autocratic dictator and a complete fuckhead.
 
Back
Top