The discussion I was responding to was how rogue judges can influence a trial. For example, Engoron with his thumb on the scales of justice. Sullivan vs Flynn where the case was dropped by the DOJ and Sullivan continued on as judge, prosecutor and jury, Durham vs Sussmann where the judge declared certain hearsay evidence as not admissible but critical evidence to the Durham case but denied, of course the evidence implicated Hillary Clinton who owns DC. I’m not defending Chauvin, I’m more concerned about equal application of the law and equal protection under the law. That takes objectivity to screen through all the bullshit.
^
A bizarro world interpretation of the reality of every single case.



