Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey. A good morning to all y’all’s fine peoples! And, yeah, I am referring to all you gun lovers who populate this thread. I is mad at yall! Did you see what happened last night? I know ya did. I made a pretty air tight factual claim about American history that someone objected to. Now, I’m sure a fairly smart person could’ve made the argument to me that, “Hey, B, native Americans, on their own accord, signed land treaties freely to settlers.” But that’s not what happened last night. Instead, one of the dumbest among you basically called me a liar. Then, when I claim that gun nuts are some of the whiniest crybabies in the world… What happened? The most whiniest of all crybabies on this forum comes forward to say, “Why is you picking on me.” So you see why I am mad at all of you casual observers (and those who don’t have me on ignore) out there. I know you can do better! When a gun reform advocate offers a challenge to your position, do not let the dumbest amongst you and the whiniest amongst you step up to speak. You deserve better than that.

Also, on topic, don’t let the person who after hour vacuums the law office be the voice for your gun rights legalese points.

Have a great day e’rbody!
Don’t shoot yourself or anyone else for that matter.
 
YES! Exactly.
On this particular thread, talking about guns, yes! I am a disrupter. I am here to make you feel fucking uncomfortable. And if you can’t take someone coming at you verbally with words, then maybe you shouldn’t be able to own a gun I want you to feel uncomfortable just like, the children in Newtown and fuckin Uvalde. So now you need to answer back intelligently to gun critics or suck it up you pussy!
You don't make me uncomfortable at all. You come across like a spoiled child who screams, and rants and raves, and holds their breath thinking that has any influence over anyone. I am a proud gun owner, a law abiding citizen, and nothing you say will change any of that. Your theatrics and admitted dumb fuckery means absolutely nothing to me or others here.

You're not a disrupter at all the gun talk and pictures have continued despite your idiocy.
 
Anyone ever notice that the lunatic fringe anti-gunners change up the tactics and name calling when they get their asses handed to them on their previous plans? Now their battle cry is sovereign citizens. They deride those of us that will defend our country against enemies both foreign and domestic. It's funny though how they can posture about unfair laws in other topics and how they must protest and rise up against them, but when we do the same we are destroying the country. Fucking hypocrites the entire lot of them.
 
That whole sovereign citizen stuff is unadulterated horse shit. You pay federal taxes? Guess what? You're not sovereign. State and local taxes? Hard not to if one owns a car and drives the state's highways and roads. Is your car legal - tax, title, tags, inspection (if applicable), and your license? You're really not sovereign. Besides, it wasn't brought up by the thunderstick crowd but the thunderpussies. So, yeah, that dog don't hunt.


The new gun has shipped. Santa is good to Wat this year.
 
Anyone ever notice that the lunatic fringe anti-gunners change up the tactics and name calling when they get their asses handed to them on their previous plans? Now their battle cry is sovereign citizens. They deride those of us that will defend our country against enemies both foreign and domestic. It's funny though how they can posture about unfair laws in other topics and how they must protest and rise up against them, but when we do the same we are destroying the country. Fucking hypocrites the entire lot of them.
Sounds like someone has a Hitch in their craw about the concept of using elections rather than armed insurrection to respond to enemies, both foreign and domestic.

Tough shit. People will continue to call out gun enthusiasts who imply that their opinions are more powerful because they are backed up with military grade weapons.
 
Besides, it wasn't brought up by the thunderstick crowd but the thunderpussies. So, yeah, that dog don't hunt.
Yes, it was brought up by the thunderstick crowd, in the form of expressing their desire to disarm federal law enforcement officials, fully arm citizens, and show the police who the fucking Alpha really is.

That kind of shit comes straight out of the Amerikkkan militia movement.
 
Yes, it was brought up by the thunderstick crowd, in the form of expressing their desire to disarm federal law enforcement officials, fully arm citizens, and show the police who the fucking Alpha really is.

That kind of shit comes straight out of the Amerikkkan militia movement.

Actually, I believe the concept of overthrowing the government by force was created by you in this thread.

The rest of us were talking about our Constitutional and statutory mandate.

So yes you, the biggest thunderpussy, flapped your gums and got your ass handed to you once more.
 
Sounds like someone has a Hitch in their craw about the concept of using elections rather than armed insurrection to respond to enemies, both foreign and domestic.

Tough shit. People will continue to call out gun enthusiasts who imply that their opinions are more powerful because they are backed up with military grade weapons.
Yawn...More blather.
 
Actually, I believe the concept of overthrowing the government by force was created by you in this thread.

The rest of us were talking about our Constitutional and statutory mandate.

So yes you, the biggest thunderpussy, flapped your gums and got your ass handed to you once more.
^^^A two-bit ambulance chaser shares his fantasy of becoming recognized as a Constitutional authority.

Most of us do not need guns to compensate for a lack of interpersonal skills and lack of respect for the electoral process. Being a man is not determined by the size of your personal armory and the degree of your machismo.

It is not coincidence that gun-nuts are so insecure about their personal nuts that they employ a misogynistic term to characterize those who want to limit access to weapons that can be used to murder the most people as rapidly as possible.
 
^^^A two-bit ambulance chaser shares his fantasy of becoming recognized as a Constitutional authority.

Most of us do not need guns to compensate for a lack of interpersonal skills and lack of respect for the electoral process. Being a man is not determined by the size of your personal armory and the degree of your machismo.

It is not coincidence that gun-nuts are so insecure about their personal nuts that they employ a misogynistic term to characterize those who want to limit access to weapons that can be used to murder the most people as rapidly as possible.

It's not my fault (NOR CAN I BE BLAMED FOR IT THIS TIME, WAT!) that you have no interpersonal skills, lack confidence and are inarticulate, illiterate, and impotent.
 
^^^A two-bit ambulance chaser shares his fantasy of becoming recognized as a Constitutional authority.

Most of us do not need guns to compensate for a lack of interpersonal skills and lack of respect for the electoral process. Being a man is not determined by the size of your personal armory and the degree of your machismo.

It is not coincidence that gun-nuts are so insecure about their personal nuts that they employ a misogynistic term to characterize those who want to limit access to weapons that can be used to murder the most people as rapidly as possible.
Be careful, he'll call you a liar and then put you on iggy.
 
So, will you outlaw cars because they run over people. or bombs because they blow up people, come on it's not they vehicle of death to banish it's the ones on the triggers.
"Some plant species can kill a person. Will you outlaw flowers now!!!"

"If you drink too much water, you will die. Will you outlaw water now!!??!!!"

"If you eat meat that's older than three days after cooking it, you could get serious food poisoning and die! Will you outlaw leftovers now!~!!!!@#1!"

"You can drown in an inch of water!!! Will you outlaw water agaaaain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

"Men are more violent than women!!!!! Will you outlaw men!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

"Arrrrrrgh!!!! Arrrrrrrrrrggggh!!!!! ARRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHH!!!! Will you now outlaw ARRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHing!!!!!"

https://media0.giphy.com/media/26xBIolZqlIdfbe5q/giphy.gif
 
My point being is there isn't any accountability, responsibility held. Medical errors are paid off by malpractice insurance and criminal gun use by soft on crime justice system
 
My point being is there isn't any accountability, responsibility held. Medical errors are paid off by malpractice insurance and criminal gun use by soft on crime justice system

THE problem is that statistics can be used to support almost anything.
 
So, will you outlaw cars because they run over people. or bombs because they blow up people, come on it's not they vehicle of death to banish it's the ones on the triggers.
This false equivalency has been exposed as such so many times it's not funny.

Come back when you can formulate an actual argument that shows why members of the general public should have access to weapons that are designed to other people in the fast way possible.

I'll gloss over your poor editing and grammar.
 
I just read your bio and you seem to have an anger issue. I don't think you make or keep very many friends. Where I live everyone has a gun rack with guns in their pickups. It's called hunting and yes, consuming the meat of the hunt. It's called protecting our livestock from predators and yes even protecting our homes and families as some of us have had to do.
Hi! With three posts all under this contentious thread, I am going to guess that this isn’t your first rodeo here. Still, despite the fact that you are adept at false equivalency and deflection, I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and wish you a welcome to the forum.
 
This is my first rodeo as you call it ,my first post anywhere here probably my last. I just have a problem with people blaming the guns for killing not the person behind it. Thank you for the welcome though, it is appreciated.
No. Stay. Your voice is welcomed. The car to gun comparison is old and tiresome to gun reform advocates and IMO not really quite the convincing rebuttal you think it is.
 
This is my first rodeo as you call it ,my first post anywhere here probably my last. I just have a problem with people blaming the guns for killing not the person behind it. Thank you for the welcome though, it is appreciated.
Wait...you came to this particular site for a reason...but your very first post was in this specific forum? In this specific thread?

over guns?

why?

didn't you come here for the sex talk? Why not make your first posts about that? 🤷‍♂️
 
The Little Dim-gin That Could

I think I can, I think I can...,
Hey Joe. Gm.
Maybe you can answer this. Is it a lie to say the rights and privileges we cherish today were built off the land and labor native Americans and black slaves?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top