The key to understanding the flawed findings of Miller is the court's view that a sawed-off shotgun having no military utility precluded its protection under the Second Amendment, which implies that those that do have military utility are protected under Miller.
Sir! Thank you for citing this! The plaintiffs in US v. Miller argued that sawed off shot guns were different than regular shot guns, thus the argument relating to the length in inches. The court ruled, as you have citied, that the 2A DOES NOT guarantee the average citizen the right to keep and bear, what we know today as, military grade or weapons of mass destruction. Unfortunately, for you and I, and defenseless children in schools, and all of the US of A, US v. Miller has been replaced by Scalia's decision in Heller.
My favorite restaurant is in Maine, and enjoying pub food, me and the wife eat inside the bar area of the restaurant a lot, and I do not fear being there. But then again, I always carry a 9mm for protection. It is NOT against the law. As long as you are not drinking, you can have a firearm in a bar in Maine.
This kind of bullshit is your justification for sucking up to the sovereign citizen crowd on Lit?
Sir. I will extend polite courtesy to you and say that I do not understand the meaning or purpose of this particular message in regards to gun safety or reform.
That's a keeper.
This kind of bull shit as you call it is 100% true. Prove me wrong or shut the fuck up.
