The Psychology of White Supremacy

[BrightShinyGirl]

Yes, because she understands that they beat nationalism of Rome, which you see as Rome.

Rome became better because of it. Still one of the best destinations on Earth.


What culture started the Roman Empire? Was it Roman?

Is any culture not from somewhere else?

Oh right.....Africa and EuroAsia....the originators. Did multiculturalism ruin them too?

The Romans themselves would have said their culture was great because it came from Troy. There's a poem about it called The Aeneid

 

[Fuzzy1975]

It's like watching cats play with a mouse.

You people are awesome.

Too bad we won't get to see a new card of Bobo bingo, this "version" will be gone before RDS can get a card up.

 

[Lazaran]

•
The myopia on display from the PB’s most recent(?) redundant and derivative racist is both expected and surprising.

The POS bases their views on their limited personal perspective, rather than the totality of current observable disparities between races that resulted from America’s historical general institutional practice of white nationalism and discrimination.

JFC

SAD!!!

That ^ is the honest truth, and it struck a nerve because it hit waaaaaaay too close to home.

Fyp; yw

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

None of this proves that multiculturalism built Rome or kept it afloat, I am assuming you have given up on saying that nonsense now.

Yes, Ancient Greece was a source of inspiration for the Roman Empire as the region’s previous largest most dominant power just like Ancient Egypt was previously for the Greeks. It doesn’t mean anything in regards to multiculturalism.

Rome was a multicultural state at the height of its power. Its founder (according to the Aeneid) was a refugee from Asia and they always saw themselves as a nation of immigrants.

As Rome grew, the circle of who was a Roman citizen expanded, first to encompass the other tribes of the peninsula, then Gauls, Africans, and Greeks. The ancestral patricians and equestrians were too tiny to conquer the Mediterranean, so they only way Rome could get big was by being multicultural.

 

[ll74]

Rome died because of it, it is literally just a wasteland.

You've never been there, obviously.

No, it was definitely the Inca

So it wasn't Roman?

Taking inspiration from another civilization and changing it to fit what you are used to is a far cry from importing another nation into yours and not expecting total disaster. The only reason you think multiculturalism works is because you think what actually are apartheid states in the west are multicultural. The moment that people are no longer able to claim what white people have and need as neutral shared resources and have to live with only what they have or start taking from other non white populations, that is the moment you will see never ending chaos and death and you will finally understand the true state of a multicultural society.

Inspiration? Lol

Multiculturalism has ravaged Africa for fucking centuries. Are you kidding me? That is literally how slavery in Africa started.

Slavery started when other countries kidnapped people for labor. Doesn't matter where you're discussing....it's the same. Africa is one place of many.

Multiculturalism is your Boogeyman. There is no place in earth that doesn't have other cultures. There is no "pure blood" nation...it's all in your twisted mind. You want white kids,.marry a white person ....good luck on having any kids or yours do the same.

In the end, nobody gives a shit about you or your victimhood.

 

[bijedi]

You've never been there, obviously.

So it wasn't Roman?

Well it depends. Are you talking the Roman Kingdom, the Roman Rebublic or the Roman Empire. There was definitely a rivalry between the Roman Kingdom and the Latin League. And although the Roman Kingdom did subsume the Latin League, most of the early leaders of the Roman Rebublic were from the Latin League. And I assure, the Romans of the Roman Kingdom definitely did not consider the people of the Latin League to be Romans.. at least not for a couple of hundred years.

 

[ll74]

My parents have and they showed me the graffiti all over what once was the mighty Roman Empire. It’s a travesty not a marvel.

I said you haven't been there. I don't give a fuck about your parents....

Who kidnapped whom? It sure as fuck wasn’t random individuals. TRIBES kidnapped other TRIBES. Yes, it was 100% because of multiculturalism.

Slave owners kidnapped slaves. Those who assisted were slave owners. I don't give a fuck if they were part of the tribes...they did so for the same shit reason and they were just as responsible.

It is everyone’s problem but you are a leftist so you see danger and disaster as quaint while peace is a problem.

I don't give a shit about "pure" bullshit. Cultures come together...good for them. I have Scottish roots and German roots. Both are part of my life.

 

[phrodeau]

My parents have and they showed me the graffiti all over what once was the mighty Roman Empire.

How much graffiti did they make?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Rome died because of it, it is literally just a wasteland.

What?

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

And then it all died despite technically being so big that it should have been impossible for the Roman Empire to die.

Maybe because the heart and brain of the empire died and it could no longer live no matter what the body did.

Rome fell piecemeal. The west went first because Italy and Gaul were too poor to hire a cavalry force that could counteract the technological superiority of the Huns. If Odoacer and his Goths could have been brought into the imperial system, the west might have been saved, so ironically the west fell because of too little multiculturalism, not too much.

The more prosperous and heterogenous east survived for hundreds of years after the west (and almost reconquered it a few times).

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

QueanKing's historical confusion stems from him trying to shoehorn classical history into modern racial categories. The Romans had no sense of "whiteness". People with a variety of different skin colors (most of them shades of brown) were seen as fully Roman. People who looked like modern whites--pale skin, blond-brown hair, blue eyes--were barbarians from the far north.

The black-white racial divide dates to the early European colonial period, when pale Europeans were looking for a way to justify their dominion over the black and brown people they were conquering.

In the Middle Ages, the main cultural divide was the Christendom-Islam split, which maps roughly onto the modern racial landscape but still the comparison is imperfect.

 

[bijedi]

This thread just became a lot more fun and interesting since it turned into a discussion of early and late Roman history.


Just saying..

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

QueanKing's historical confusion stems from him trying to shoehorn classical history into modern racial categories. The Romans had no sense of "whiteness". People with a variety of different skin colors (most of them shades of brown) were seen as fully Roman. People who looked like modern whites--pale skin, blond-brown hair, blue eyes--were barbarians from the far north.

The black-white racial divide dates to the early European colonial period, when pale Europeans were looking for a way to justify their dominion over the black and brown people they were conquering.

In the Middle Ages, the main cultural divide was the Christendom-Islam split, which maps roughly onto the modern racial landscape but still the comparison is imperfect.

And don't even get me started on how the classical Greek-Persian rivalry has been misused to justify Islamophobia. Despite the claims of 300, there is no age-old battle between eastern decadence and western manliness.

 

[bijedi]

And don't even get me started on how the classical Greek-Persian rivalry has been misused to justify Islamophobia. Despite the claims of 300, there is no age-old battle between eastern decadence and western manliness.

And don't forget the Moors. I'm sure our friend has.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

This thread just became a lot more fun and interesting since it turned into a discussion of early and late Roman history.


Just saying..

Thank you <curtsy>

 

[Fuzzy1975]

This thread just became a lot more fun and interesting since it turned into a discussion of early and late Roman history.


Just saying..

Definitely an improved discussion when the the mental incompetent person has left the chat.

 

[dkovic77]

Definitely an improved discussion when the the mental incompetent person has left the chat.

We all know IT will be back. Stephen King has shown us that IT always comes back….

 

[Fuzzy1975]

We all know IT will be back. Stephen King has shown us that IT always comes back….

Not if Manu gets back first! Well this alteration of him anyhow.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

And don't forget the Moors. I'm sure our friend has.

Now you're getting into the Renaissance!

Which also was more racially varied because colonialism hadn't built up a head of steam.

The Moors were outsiders in Europe, not because if their skin color, but their religion.

And at the east end of Africa were the Ethiopians, darker than the Moors, but Christian.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

I'm telling myself this historical self-indulgence is all still on topic for the thread, because the white supremacist construction of "whiteness" is ahistorical.

They pretend that "whiteness" is grounded in fundamental cultural differences, but if you look closely at world history, "white" as an identity is only about 400 years old.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I'm telling myself this historical self-indulgence is all still on topic for the thread, because the white supremacist construction of "whiteness" is ahistorical.

They pretend "whiteness" is grounded in fundamental cultural differences, but if you look closely at world history, "white" as an identity is only about 400 years old.

That would be an interesting topic, myself I would set the date middle 1700's.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

And don't forget the Moors. I'm sure our friend has.

No, sorry. It was the Moops.

 

[RandyRebecca]

Fascism has a very specific meaning. It's not a free-floating insult.

And you misspelled "Democratic Party".

According to Leon Trotsky, fascism is a mass movement of counter-revolutionary despair. It is financed by big capital as shock troops against the organized labor movement, but big capital never really sees the fascists as one of their own. Marxism is revolutionary hope, fascism is counter-revolutionary despair.

Fascism, funded by big business, organizes the elements in capitalist society that have been consumed by despair, and directs them as a battering ram against the organized labor movement and its trade unions. The coming to power of fascism only happens when the ruling capitalist class has failed with every other method to restore "order", i.e. capitalist order. If fascism does come to power, it smashes the labor movement to bits in the most extreme scenario, and the state will then forcibly aid big business corporations to profitability, completely at the expense of defenseless workers. This is what happened in Germany 1933-1934 and beyond. This differentiates fascism from a military coup dictatorship, for example, as military coups tend not to have a mass base and tend to take place behind the backs of the people in most circumstances.

 

[RandyRebecca]

I've had many civil debates with other Republicans on this message board. I don't hate them, I mostly feel sorry for them. I feel sorry for you too, trapped in your cage of grievance and resentment.

I know it's hard to hear harsh truths from a mouthy Jew bitch, but the road you're on has no happy ending.

American History X shows that. Every Trump supporter should watch that film, perhaps Democrats too.

 

[AlexBailey]

She was completely unarmed and was shot because she was an easy target being pushed by leftists and government infiltrators into the broken window.

You’re making up your own reality.

The videos shot by other people of the moment Babbit tried to break through the window show how she was determined to get in the chamber.

Why do you make up lies?