Twice impeached, thrice indicted: Pole - who won the 2020 US election for President?

[BoyNextDoor]

Have you read it yet: Case 1:23-cr-00257-TSC Document 1 Filed 08/01/23

If you have not read it, all 45 pages, then I am sure you have nothing valid to say and can fuck off. So we need a pole - Lets get right down to it: Did Trump win in 2020? or did Biden win in 2020?

How do you make a pole on this new upgraded LIT? What a pain in the ass. Ok - so until the pole can be posted say it in the comments: Who won the 2020 election?

 

[KateAt55]

Poll.

 

[RoryN]

The problem you'll run into is that most Lit Deplorables who still think Trump rightfully won the election are no longer admitting it, and will vehemently deny believing it.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

The problem you'll run into is that most Lit Deplorables who still think Trump rightfully won the election are no longer admitting it, and will vehemently deny believing it.

Well that creates a problem for them and Trump, who will be serving time before the 2024 election.

 

[SubzeroGirl]

Ownership is 9/10ths of the law.

Stop living in the past, you can’t change it and we rarely learn from it.

 

[Dribble]

^^^that's one vote Trump won

 

[jomar]

trump’s new lawyer on the case, a vaguely Kramer from Seinfeld character, does a respectable Kellyanne Conway bullshit sling.

 

[Chernosoth]

Since OP did not link the document, he might be the only one here who will ever read it. Most people don't care enough to search for the document.

Who won? The corporatocracy, briefly. Its self-destruction is accelerating.

 

[ll74]

Since OP did not link the document, he might be the only one here who will ever read it. Most people don't care enough to search for the document.

Who won? The corporatocracy, briefly. Its self-destruction is accelerating.

I completely agree. The OP should provide the source, which they have insisted is the most important thing or stop claiming that it is.

 

[Dribble]

^^^second vote for Trump won

 

[Dribble]

I completely agree. The OP should provide the source, which they have insisted is the most important thing or stop claiming that it is.

Why? There are links on every news site.

 

[ll74]

Why? There are links on every news site.

I"ve explained the importance and significance of providing the source. If it's important enough to you, then providing it to others is a no brainer.

Fuck the "google it"/"why can't you do your own research" bullshit.

 

[CurvySassyAJ]

All I know is America lost the 2020 election before the first vote was cast but the cattle are still bickering about it as well as 2016.

But hey, your political party still cares about the people so there is that. Right? Keep telling yourselves that and keeping voting the same ones back in. It works so well.

 

[Dribble]

I"ve explained the importance and significance of providing the source. If it's important enough to you, then providing it to others is a no brainer.

Fuck the "google it"/"why can't you do your own research" bullshit.

Sorry you are incapable of thinking. Not surprising really is it? It isn't your fault...your parents obviously failed

 

[ll74]

Sorry you are incapable of thinking. Not surprising really is it? It isn't your fault...your parents obviously failed

Yes, I get that you support people not providing their sources.

 

[RoryN]

Why? There are links on every news site.

He thinks nit picking makes him appear "balanced" re: his commentary on the PB.

Rookie mistake. But no damage; it only serves to bump the thread.

Fuck the "google it"/"why can't you do your own research" bullshit.

What is "Google"?

Please provide a source. Kthx.

 

[ll74]

“If you have not read it, all 45 pages, then I am sure you have nothing valid to say and can fuck off.”

I think posting a link with that kind of challenge is reasonable.

Posting a link to the document, which your entire thread is based off of, is reasonable.

Yes, the indictment is available on multiple sites - most of them with in depth and biased analysis of that indictment. I'm more likely to find one that aligns with my biases and miss out on the perspective of the OP.

Lazy people are lazy....I appreciate that you did the work for them and provided the raw source rather than analysis....though it is not deserved.

 

[RoryN]

Yes, the indictment is available on multiple sites - most of them with in depth and biased analysis of that indictment. I'm more likely to find one that aligns with my biases and miss out on the perspective of the OP.

Straw-grasping dumb take. Download the document from said sites and ignore the commentary if you feel your sensitivities are that delicate.

 

[ll74]

It’s not for them, it’s for anyone who wishes to engage in solid debate on the topic.

Yep. And I find those who don't provide it truly don't want to engage in anything.

 

[Bray123]

In other news, even Trump's event organisers think he's going to prison.

 

[Dribble]

He thinks he is smarter than he is.

When teaching...do teachers...or professors...provide links? Or do they say...go answer this question? Why do you think they do this?

It isn't my job to educate those that don't want educated. They will just ignore those links. But if they do it themselves...they learn.

Edit: I already know the answer when I post a comment. I don't need to appear smart. I already am smarter than a good many here. Who cares?

 

[picsonly]

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/jack-smith-and-the-24-missing-minutes.1592570/#post-97337363

 

[JBoy1952]

So, is the document "Literotica" ?
Does the political/legal "document" posting or any political crap on this site do anything other than infect and fester injury and insult to other people's opinions?

Does it tickle anyone's libido?

 

[VinnyVeritas]

Poll.

Exactly.