Verdict in Trump rape case: guilty as fuck.

“I will never apologize for defending someone from the mob.”

Cool! Now do Emmett Till.
 
But you are proven liars, and Deplorables. So, that means nothing to anyone but your kind. And my side supports me..🙂

Great example of yet more false equivalency on your side's part. 😘

Your "side" consists of assholes spewing shit at galactic speeds. But it's nice to know you prefer to associate with them.
 
“I will never apologize for defending anyone from the mob.”

Interesting change in wording, but ok…

Cool!
Now do Jim Crow lynchings.
 
“I will never apologize for defending anyone from the mob.”

Interesting change in wording, but ok…

Cool!
Now do Jim Crow lynchings.

Once again:

I will never apologize for defending ANYONE from the mob.
 
Oh, you mean mob as in Mafia.
 

Attachments

  • 5B768052-6ECD-407C-B160-98BAAE4B9C33.jpeg
    5B768052-6ECD-407C-B160-98BAAE4B9C33.jpeg
    101.1 KB · Views: 1
Oh, you mean mob as in Mafia.

Let me ask you something:

If there was a midnight cross burning going on, do you think you'd be the guy who owns the lawn or one of those fine members of society who are warming themselves at the mostly peaceful bonfire?
 
I think you meant that question as a deflection, but it’s very telling that I bring up mob violence against black folks who you claim to defend against and your pivot is to, checks notes - kkk cross burnings.
 
Let me ask you something:

If there was a midnight cross burning going on, do you think you'd be the guy who owns the lawn or one of those fine members of society who are warming themselves at the mostly peaceful bonfire?

You’d argue that the KKK wasn’t terrorizing anyone, they were simply donating firewood and art to someone’s lawn.
 
You’d argue that the KKK wasn’t terrorizing anyone, they were simply donating firewood and art to someone’s lawn.

At least I wouldn't be a member of the group of mostly peaceful 'smores fans who were simply borrowing that lawn.

Can you say the same for yourself?
 
I think you meant that question as a deflection, but it’s very telling that I bring up mob violence against black folks who you claim to defend against and your pivot is to, checks notes - kkk cross burnings.

I will never apologize for defending anyone from the mob.
 
At least I wouldn't be a member of the group of mostly peaceful 'smores fans who were simply borrowing that lawn.

Can you say the same for yourself?

You’d be defending them, because guess what? Your bullshit whiny limp-wristed accusations that democrats on the whole are more racist than MAGA deplorables is just funny.
 
I refuse to answer your question. Simply because I did not put my character into question by stating a claim. You said that you defend a person, anyone, idk what the hell else against mobs. I asked you to back that claim up citing two examples.
I think it would just be better for all if you just said that you were confused. Don’t understand the question. Can’t follow the conversation.
 
You’d be defending them, because guess what? Your bullshit whiny limp-wristed accusations that democrats on the whole are more racist than MAGA deplorables is just funny.

No matter who they are or what they've allegedly done, they are still entitled to a defense.

Which means someone's got to step up and do it.

You see, good or bad, I'm the guy who's there defending them from the mob. Conversely, I'm also defending you from yourself at the same time by not letting you just have your way to do whatever you want and then regretting your choices later. Not because I endorse what they did, but because I don't support what you're doing.
 
I refuse to answer your question. Simply because I did not put my character into question by stating a claim. You said that you defend a person, anyone, idk what the hell else against mobs. I asked you to back that claim up citing two examples.
I think it would just be better for all if you just said that you were confused. Don’t understand the question. Can’t follow the conversation.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is what crazy looks like when it's left to wander unsupervised in society.

*iggy*
 
This is no game to women who have been sexually abused and it certainly wasn't a game to the members of the jury who did their civic duty.

There are procedural issues which may result in this jury decision being overturned.

The appeals court may also find that the jury was correct and that the procedural issues weren't prejudicial to their finding.

Until that happens, this game is not over despite how you feel about other non-related events/persons.
 
I’ve continually asked you a targeted question for you to defend your claim. You’ve given me word salads.
Yet, I’m the crazy. The things you are saying are either disingenuous or the ramblings of an actual crazy person. Either way, this crazy person realizes now that they’re not going to get a direct answer from you, so therefore I’m going to take my crazy ass on.
 
Here. I’ll defend the claim that YOU made, but were, for the last hour, too chicken shit to actually say.
The killing of Emmett Till, a child, by a white mob was wrong, a crime against society, and morally indefensible.
Indiscriminately lynchings up through the 1950s and 60s of black Americans by white mobs was wrong, a crime against society, and morally indefensible. How hard was that? But you’ve proven to be comfortable with racism by the things you’ve said here. So I’m gonna give you another chance by giving you an easier, more timely example, with a white dude, no less.
Defend Mike Pence against the J6 mob. Go!
 
Back
Top