Verdict in Trump rape case: guilty as fuck.

"A Manhattan federal jury found that Donald Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll in a luxury department store dressing room in the spring of 1996." - CNN
 
The floodgates are open.

Now criminally prosecute and convict the corrupt orange rapey traitor.

👍

🇺🇸
 
Last edited:
Somebioody wanna tell the crazy CanuckToi this was not a criminal trial and no crime needs to have been alledged?
 
Awesome. So is there any evidence for the alleged crimes besides the claims themselves?
You would have to read the transcripts of the civil trial to understand that the plaintiff met the standard of presenting the preponderance of evidence for the assault and defamation charges.

Reading would require more attention span than you possess.
 
I know one piece of pieces of evidence presented was Trump's own words from the access Hollywood tape where he describes exactly what he's accused of doing.

Maybe Trump's lawyers should have presented an actual defense. 🙂
Where Trunp said women let (ie: consent) to him kissing and touching them? Fail to see any issue there.
 
Awesome. So is there any evidence for the alleged crimes besides the claims themselves?

You would have to read the transcripts of the civil trial to understand that the plaintiff met the standard of presenting the preponderance of evidence for the assault and defamation charges.

Reading would require more attention span than you possess.

^^^
Perfect answer to a Deplorable sea lion.

Others should take note. 😎
 
Where Trunp said women let (ie: consent) to him kissing and touching them? Fail to see any issue there.
Lol, that's consent after the fact. He said he just grabs them. That's a crime and the jury agreed.

But hey, you can defend that realist as much as you want. 🙂
 
You would have to read the transcripts of the civil trial to understand that the plaintiff met the standard of presenting the preponderance of evidence for the assault and defamation charges.
So, again I ask, is there evidence for the accusations and asserted claims beyond the existence of the accusations and asserted claims?
 
So, again I ask, is there evidence for the accusations and asserted claims beyond the existence of the accusations and asserted claims?

You would have to read the transcripts of the civil trial to understand that the plaintiff met the standard of presenting the preponderance of evidence for the assault and defamation charges.
 
His defense seems to be that he's grabbed so much pussy over the years without being concerned who owns it, that he has no recollection of this particular one.

That's from his own deposition, there was no further defense offered. He lied to the court when he told them that he was returning from Ireland to give evidence, then didn't show up (surprise, surprise). That must have gone down well.
 
Back
Top