Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bless yourSo, again I ask, is there evidence for the accusations and asserted claims beyond the existence of the accusations and asserted claims?
That wasn't my question and doesn't answer my actual question.You would have to read the transcripts of the civil trial to understand that the plaintiff met the standard of presenting the preponderance of evidence for the assault and defamation charges.
Bless yourThat wasn't my question and doesn't answer my actual question.
Beyond a shadow of doubt, peewee.Is there any evidence of the claimed crime besides the claim itself?
He's from Alberta, Canada's version of Texas. So basically he's an idiot.You would have to read the transcripts of the civil trial to understand that the plaintiff met the standard of presenting the preponderance of evidence for the assault and defamation charges.
That wasn't my question and doesn't answer my actual question.
And that evidence is...?Beyond a shadow of doubt, peewee.
The writer E. Jean Carroll, who has accused Donald J. Trump of raping her in the 1990s and is suing him for defamation, asked on Thursday that he provide a DNA sample to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she had on at the time of the incident.So, again I ask, is there evidence for the accusations and asserted claims beyond the existence of the accusations and asserted claims?
..enough to convict.And that evidence is...?
Let's just say such a sample was provided and was an exact match. What does that prove?The writer E. Jean Carroll, who has accused Donald J. Trump of raping her in the 1990s and is suing him for defamation, asked on Thursday that he provide a DNA sample to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she had on at the time of the incident.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/nyregion/e-jean-carroll-trump-dna.html
Trump should have been required to give a DNA sample.
So, again I ask, is there evidence for the accusations and asserted claims beyond the existence of the accusations and asserted claims?
.... enough to find liable for a civil claim...enough to convict.
It was not a criminal case, it was civil, which is very different. Without being in the courtroom or reading the transcript, it's clear the jury (6 men and 3 women) who heard from both sides determined the evidence was enough to find him guilty. Trump incriminated himself several times in his comments and tweets over the years. Plaintiff had witnesses, defendant had no one, not even the defendant could be bothered to show up. He doesn't care.Awesome. So is there any evidence for the alleged crimes besides the claims themselves?
Like Trump can get a fair trial in Manhattan LMFAOCivil trials do require evidence. The fact that it went to trial and a guilty verdict was rendered indicates that evidence was provided that was deemed sufficient to convict. The standard of evidence is less than it is in a criminal trial, but it is not sufficient to just make an accusation without backing it up.
And still did more to help the USA than the current dickhead/molester/incompetent supposedly in charge.Bankrupt multiple times, failed businessman.
Convicted fraudster
Convicted rapist
Spied on undressed children at beauty pageants
Admitted sexual assaults
Convicted defamer
Admitted liar about Obama’s birth certificate
Convicted racketeer
Admitted tax evader
Admitted destruction of evidence
Admitted adulterer
Impeached twice
Mocked the disabled
Said he hated the thought of black accountants counting his money
Insulted leaders of friendly nations
Praised Putin, Xi and Kim (got called ‘Dotard’ in return)
Incited an insurrection
Stated he wanted to rip up the Constitution and start again with one of his children installed as successor.
Stated he wanted to award himself a Congressional Medal of Honor.
Yup, he's a shoe-in Republican candidate for 2024.
oh mai gah here come the excuses LMFAOLike Trump can get a fair trial in Manhattan LMFAO
Trump didn't even present a defense. That's not on the jury or the location.Like Trump can get a fair trial in Manhattan LMFAO
oh mai gah here come the excuses LMFAO
Until someone can establish there was evidence beyond the existence of accusations and asserted claims, I fail to see what reasonable conclusions can be made.It was not a criminal case, it was civil, which is very different. Without being in the courtroom or reading the transcript, it's clear the jury (6 men and 3 women) who heard from both sides determined the evidence was enough to find him guilty. Trump incriminated himself several times in his comments and tweets over the years. Plaintiff had witnesses, defendant had no one, not even the defendant could be bothered to show up. He doesn't care.
And still did more to help the USA than the current dickhead/molester/incompetent supposedly in charge.
https://wp-uploads.qualbert.com/2023/05/Drax-mantis-laughing.gifDidn't some lying bitch (you can tell it's a lib with this name) Christine Blasey Ford say Kavanaugh was also guilty of rape? The dems dig deep to lie and slander the opposition. Rig primaries (proven) and presidential (will be proven) elections.