Verdict in Trump rape case: guilty as fuck.

I hope he never learns that coming into my threads almost guarantees a beat-down.

It's too entertaining to give up. 😁
 
You would have to read the transcripts of the civil trial to understand that the plaintiff met the standard of presenting the preponderance of evidence for the assault and defamation charges.
That wasn't my question and doesn't answer my actual question.
 
Can you believe this bloke was once President of the USA......lol.
So many of you believe every word he says, I really don't know whether I feel sorry for you or think you are as deluded as the bloke with the shredded wheat on his head.
 
You would have to read the transcripts of the civil trial to understand that the plaintiff met the standard of presenting the preponderance of evidence for the assault and defamation charges.
He's from Alberta, Canada's version of Texas. So basically he's an idiot.
 
Bankrupt multiple times, failed businessman.

Convicted fraudster

Convicted rapist

Spied on undressed children at beauty pageants

Admitted sexual assaults

Convicted defamer

Admitted liar about Obama’s birth certificate

Convicted racketeer

Admitted tax evader

Admitted destruction of evidence

Admitted adulterer

Impeached twice

Mocked the disabled

Said he hated the thought of black accountants counting his money

Insulted leaders of friendly nations

Praised Putin, Xi and Kim (got called ‘Dotard’ in return)

Incited an insurrection

Stated he wanted to rip up the Constitution and start again with one of his children installed as successor.

Stated he wanted to award himself a Congressional Medal of Honor.


Yup, he's a shoe-in Republican candidate for 2024.
 
That wasn't my question and doesn't answer my actual question.

No - it does. But you seem to be having reading-comprehension issues. There are good resources available for increasing your abilities in this area. 🙂

(Also, you might notice that the people who share the same viewpoints as yourself - and who usually jump at the chance to protect and support one of their own - are not supporting you here. That's called a "hint".) 😘
 
So, again I ask, is there evidence for the accusations and asserted claims beyond the existence of the accusations and asserted claims?
The writer E. Jean Carroll, who has accused Donald J. Trump of raping her in the 1990s and is suing him for defamation, asked on Thursday that he provide a DNA sample to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she had on at the time of the incident.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/nyregion/e-jean-carroll-trump-dna.html

Trump should have been required to give a DNA sample.
 
The writer E. Jean Carroll, who has accused Donald J. Trump of raping her in the 1990s and is suing him for defamation, asked on Thursday that he provide a DNA sample to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she had on at the time of the incident.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/nyregion/e-jean-carroll-trump-dna.html

Trump should have been required to give a DNA sample.
Let's just say such a sample was provided and was an exact match. What does that prove?
 
So, again I ask, is there evidence for the accusations and asserted claims beyond the existence of the accusations and asserted claims?

Civil trials do require evidence. The fact that it went to trial and a guilty verdict was rendered indicates that evidence was provided that was deemed sufficient to convict. The standard of evidence is less than it is in a criminal trial, but a conviction requires more than simply making an accusation. The whole system is built on a series of laws and rules and procedures designed to thoroughly review the circumstances and come to a balanced conclusion. It isn't perfect but the mere fact that due process led to a guilty verdict tells you that there was sufficient evidence to do so.
 
Last edited:
Awesome. So is there any evidence for the alleged crimes besides the claims themselves?
It was not a criminal case, it was civil, which is very different. Without being in the courtroom or reading the transcript, it's clear the jury (6 men and 3 women) who heard from both sides determined the evidence was enough to find him guilty. Trump incriminated himself several times in his comments and tweets over the years. Plaintiff had witnesses, defendant had no one, not even the defendant could be bothered to show up. He doesn't care.
 
Civil trials do require evidence. The fact that it went to trial and a guilty verdict was rendered indicates that evidence was provided that was deemed sufficient to convict. The standard of evidence is less than it is in a criminal trial, but it is not sufficient to just make an accusation without backing it up.
Like Trump can get a fair trial in Manhattan LMFAO
 
Bankrupt multiple times, failed businessman.

Convicted fraudster

Convicted rapist

Spied on undressed children at beauty pageants

Admitted sexual assaults

Convicted defamer

Admitted liar about Obama’s birth certificate

Convicted racketeer

Admitted tax evader

Admitted destruction of evidence

Admitted adulterer

Impeached twice

Mocked the disabled

Said he hated the thought of black accountants counting his money

Insulted leaders of friendly nations

Praised Putin, Xi and Kim (got called ‘Dotard’ in return)

Incited an insurrection

Stated he wanted to rip up the Constitution and start again with one of his children installed as successor.

Stated he wanted to award himself a Congressional Medal of Honor.


Yup, he's a shoe-in Republican candidate for 2024.
And still did more to help the USA than the current dickhead/molester/incompetent supposedly in charge.
 
Didn't some lying bitch (you can tell it's a lib with this name) Christine Blasey Ford say Kavanaugh was also guilty of rape? The dems dig deep to lie and slander the opposition. Rig primaries (proven) and presidential (will be proven) elections.
 
It was not a criminal case, it was civil, which is very different. Without being in the courtroom or reading the transcript, it's clear the jury (6 men and 3 women) who heard from both sides determined the evidence was enough to find him guilty. Trump incriminated himself several times in his comments and tweets over the years. Plaintiff had witnesses, defendant had no one, not even the defendant could be bothered to show up. He doesn't care.
Until someone can establish there was evidence beyond the existence of accusations and asserted claims, I fail to see what reasonable conclusions can be made.

If there is no evidence beyond simple accusations and asserted claims, no wonder Trump didn't bother to show up.
 
And still did more to help the USA than the current dickhead/molester/incompetent supposedly in charge.
Didn't some lying bitch (you can tell it's a lib with this name) Christine Blasey Ford say Kavanaugh was also guilty of rape? The dems dig deep to lie and slander the opposition. Rig primaries (proven) and presidential (will be proven) elections.
https://wp-uploads.qualbert.com/2023/05/Drax-mantis-laughing.gif

yepppp. The schmucks are in deep in their feels now.

might's well pop the popcorn, it's gonna be a lonnnnnnng night for some folks here! :ROFLMAO:
 
Back
Top