Nashville Shooter Is A 28 Year Old Woman.

While the tone of their heart might be difficult to determine, the ability for family and therapists to remove guns from people should be nationwide. Those seeking mental health assistance should demonstrate they can be responsible to continue owning their weapon, regularly. Those called out by others should demonstrate even more that they can handle one.

Guns that cause more damage more quickly should have a higher threshold of ownership criteria. The same should apply to ammo purchases.
Our tax money should be heavily focused on mental health while enforcing gun laws. Somehow individuals with severe mental illness should be placed on some kind of federal or state register, not as an infringement of personal rights but as a way to monitor an individual that could cause personal harm or harm to others. I don't see that happening.
 
It's already appropriated but unused funding for covid relief. It was bipartisan.
So it's not a mental health situation and the funding should go to funding the support of more weapons and unqualified morons in schools and not addressing the actual problem at all. Excellent!
 
Our tax money should be heavily focused on mental health while enforcing gun laws. Somehow individuals with severe mental illness should be placed on some kind of federal or state register, not as an infringement of personal rights but as a way to monitor an individual that could cause personal harm or harm to others. I don't see that happening.
I agree. A person should be required to prove responsibility of the weapon. It should not be a huge burden for most, but should be a larger burden for some.
 
Interesting choice of words. “Wouldn’t be my choice” for slaughtering children at a fortified school. I didn’t realize that was actually on your radar, so I’ll stop now before I give you any more ideas.
You really are a fucking dumb ass you know that? I answered a post about the AR-15 being a high powered rifle with factual information about the military moving away from it due to its limitations and you turn it into me murdering school children. You are obviously a tool of the left. Fine work.

The fact that I have repeatedly stated that I have never pointed a gun at anyone, let alone shot them, is inconsequential to the stupid little games you play.
 
I agree. A person should be required to prove responsibility of the weapon. It should not be a huge burden for most, but should be a larger burden for some.
As long as you're going to go there, let's require tests before an individual is allowed to vote.
 
As long as you're going to go there, let's require tests before an individual is allowed to vote.
Lol, fuck off with your false equivalency. No vote has ever killed six people at school.

Next, you'll be bringing up car accidents.
 
Lol, fuck off with your false equivalency. No vote has ever killed six people at school.

Next, you'll be bringing up car accidents.
Sadly, votes for politicians in the pocket of the NRA have killed many more than six people at schools.
 
Sadly, votes for politicians in the pocket of the NRA have killed many more than six people at schools.
Not remotely the same. The only reason they pivot to cars and votes is because they refuse to admit the risk of guns pose to society.
 
Not remotely the same. The only reason they pivot to cars and votes is because they refuse to admit the risk of guns pose to society.
Yeah, I got that. My point was simply that votes matter. We wouldn’t have all of these assault rifles out in circulation if the ban on assault rifles had continued. That genie can’t be put back in the bottle, but a lesson can be learned about voting for people who say who they are by sending out cards with their families brandishing AR-15’s in front of their Christmas tree.
 
Yeah, I got that. My point was simply that votes matter. We wouldn’t have all of these assault rifles out in circulation if the ban on assault rifles had continued. That genie can’t be put back in the bottle, but a lesson can be learned about voting for people who say who they are by sending out cards with their families brandishing AR-15’s in front of their Christmas tree.
Sorry, but playing off of someone else's dishonest horseshit is not a good thing, no matter your point.
 
I already stated you must not have read where I specified handguns because I'm actually knowledgable on the subject.

Okay by your logic the rights of a person to own and operate cars shall not be infringed and needing a license is a violation of the 2nd amendment. The 2nd states ARMS not guns, not firearms. This was a time when swords were still used in war.

So which is is RG? Does everybody have a RIGHT to own a car that shall not be INFRINGED or is there a distinction between a car and a gun or knife that I'm unaware of?
My point about vehicles was that government licensing, registration, and regulation of their use do not stop an evil person from turning them into weapons. The same goes for firearms because it isn't the guns or the existence of guns that cause them to be used by criminals to hurt people, it's the person with evil intent that is the problem. This is proved by the fact that 99% of firearms or their owners in the US will never use their guns to commit a crime.
 
If the intent of the product (automobiles) was to kill people, then yes, they should be banned from ownership by the general public.

If you can’t understand that…

Bless your heart.
No, it's evil people who commit crimes with anything that can be turned into a weapon, not the tool or the gun.
 
My point about vehicles was that government licensing, registration, and regulation of their use do not stop an evil person from turning them into weapons. The same goes for firearms because it isn't the guns or the existence of guns that cause them to be used by criminals to hurt people, it's the person with evil intent that is the problem. This is proved by the fact that 99% of firearms or their owners in the US will never use their guns to commit a crime.
Cars are not meant to be weapons and people who buy them don't intend to do harm. The false equivalency is bullshit and meant to diminish the significant difference in risk of harm from the weapon.
 
No, it's evil people who commit crimes with anything that can be turned into a weapon, not the tool or the gun.
"Evil" people with guns do significantly more damage to human beings than those with other "weapons"
 
Yes there is such a thing as grandfathered. If the feds and Biden or some other lefty loon in office gets their way a ban will not stop at sales. There's a reason for the left pushing for a federal register. If the Marxist movement takes all three branches of government they will pass legislation to confiscate all make believe assault weapons.
Speaking of a "federal register" according to congressional testimony the other day the ATF admitted they were forced to destroy some 252 million firearm ownership records they have collected surreptitiously and illegally over the years. They did this as a backdoor option for a federal firearms registry which is forbidden by law for them to compile.
 
Biden isn't a lefty. He's barely to the left of center which is part of why his approval ratings are as low as they are. There is no Marxist movement and shut the fuck up about that, the odds that the Left will get the needed 60+ majority needed and hold the presidency long enough for the conservatives on the court to die or quit is nil to none. The idea of them growing a pair and just packing the court is even lower.
If Biden isn't a "lefty" he's a CCP puppet.
 
It pretty much is, any limitations have to be severely circumscribed.

Do you need to register with the government before you make public utterances? Do you need to register with the government before you can worship at the church of your choice? And while we're on religion, does the government have the power to create a list of 'approved' churches/religions? Do the various public news/views platforms have to register with the government before they can operate?

Yes, there are certain limitations that can be placed on the exercise of second amendment rights, but the government doesn't have unlimited power to infringe on that right just because they feel they should. The Bruen decision explicitly removed that reasoning from any governments attempt to infringe.

In order for the left to achieve their desired goal they're going to have to amend or strike the 2nd amendment, good luck with that.
They don't realize that 26 states now have Constitutional carry. If blue states want to force this issue they will be starting a civil war. But it will have to wait until we finish with WWIII Biden is busy trying to start as we speak.
 
Speaking of a "federal register" according to congressional testimony the other day the ATF admitted they were forced to destroy some 252 million firearm ownership records they have collected surreptitiously and illegally over the years. They did this as a backdoor option for a federal firearms registry which is forbidden by law for them to compile.
Yepper, illegal record keeping on gun owners. And yet people can't fathom why gun owners don't believe a fucking thing the government says about guns.
 
Back
Top