Gov. Kathy Hochul Kicked In The Butt

[Rightguide]

Federal Judge Blocks N.Y. Law Mandating Social Media 'Hateful Conduct' Policies​

By Charlie McCarthy | Wednesday, 15 February 2023 11:16 AM EST
A federal judge has blocked New York's new law that prohibits hate speech on social media, ruling the measure violates the Constitution's protection of free speech.

U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. on Tuesday, in Volokh v. James, sided with the Volokh Conspiracy legal blog and Peter Thiel-backed video site Rumble Inc., which claimed the law will hurt online services and silence disfavored viewpoints.

New York Democrat Gov. Kathy Hochul in June signed a legislative package that included new regulations governing how social media platforms police what the law calls "hateful conduct."

The "Hateful Conduct Law" required that social media websites make it easy for users to report "incidents of hateful conduct," and to respond to complaints explaining how the matter is being handled.

The rest here: https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/first-amendment-court-blocks/2023/02/15/id/1108781/

We all knew this would happen, all but the looney totalitarian left.

 

[KeithD]

Rightguard supporting hate speech. What a surprise.

 

[Rightguide]

Rightguard supporting hate speech. What a surprise.

No dunce, Rightguard supporting the First Amendment.

 

[schism666]

No dunce, Rightguard supporting the First Amendment.

hate speech isn't covered under 1a.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

hate speech isn't covered under 1a.

Self own # 2 for Rightguide today....

 

[schism666]

Self own # 2 for Rightguide today....

you would think that a self appointed constitutional scholar and fanboy of the founding fathers would know better.

then you remember that vette is a poorly educated lying buffoon.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Rightguard supporting hate speech. What a surprise.

 

[Chobham]

Let's see a non-subjective definition of "Hate Speech."

 

[schism666]

Let's see a non-subjective definition of "Hate Speech."

you calling asylum seekers and brown people in general "cockroaches" is 100% hate speech.

what do i win?

 

[Chobham]

you calling asylum seekers and brown people in general "cockroaches" is 100% hate speech.

what do i win?

Nothing. You didn't address the subject.

 

[schism666]

Nothing. You didn't address the subject.

i literally answered your ignorant question with a fact.
were the pew-pews too loud on range day wednesday causing further brain damage?

 

[Chobham]

i literally answered your ignorant question with a fact.
were the pew-pews too loud on range day wednesday causing further brain damage?

I concede that some might find it offensive, then again some folks are offended if you merely say, "Good Morning." I really don't care if you, the cockroaches, rats, spiders, ant, mice, or any of the other vermin that try to invade my home (nation) are offended. You and the rest of the vermin can go fuck themselves.

 

[schism666]

I concede that some might find it offensive, then again some folks are offended if you merely say, "Good Morning." I really don't care if you, the cockroaches, rats, spiders, ant, mice, or any of the other vermin that try to invade my home (nation) are offended. You and the rest of the vermin can go fuck themselves.

asylum seekers are doing what your forefathers (vermin) did, assmeal.
it's good that your brand of hate is confined to a podunk town in a podunk state around podunk people.
your ignorance is the only offending thing about you. oh, and that permanent 'shine odor that permeates your pickled skin.

 

[Chobham]

asylum seekers are doing what your forefathers (vermin) did, assmeal.
it's good that your brand of hate is confined to a podunk town in a podunk state around podunk people.
your ignorance is the only offending thing about you. oh, and that permanent 'shine odor that permeates your pickled skin.

Go peddle your horse shit somewhere else.

67% of those that claim asylum are denied and ordered deported, and those are the ones that show up for the hearings. And those that don't are also ordered deported, but they've already disappeared into the woodwork, JUST LIKE THE COMMON COCKROACH. Then there are those "got aways" who also have disappeared into the woodwork, JUST LIKE THE COMMON COCKROACH. So only 33% of those that actually show up in court might expect to be granted asylum.

My ancestors arrived here before this was even a nation. Ended up taking the place over. Why? Well the folks that lived here didn't have an immigration policy let alone enforce it.

 

[ll74]

Go peddle your horse shit somewhere else.

67% of those that claim asylum are denied and ordered deported, and those are the ones that show up for the hearings. And those that don't are also ordered deported, but they've already disappeared into the woodwork, JUST LIKE THE COMMON COCKROACH. Then there are those "got aways" who also have disappeared into the woodwork, JUST LIKE THE COMMON COCKROACH. So only 33% of those that actually show up in court might expect to be granted asylum.

My ancestors arrived here before this was even a nation. Ended up taking the place over. Why? Well the folks that lived here didn't have an immigration policy let alone enforce it.

Human beings should never be compared to cockroaches.

Immigration allows asylum claims as a law. Don't like it, change the law.

 

[Chobham]

Human beings should never be compared to cockroaches.

Immigration allows asylum claims as a law. Don't like it, change the law.

I call them anything I damn well please.

Have I said anything about the asylum laws? But I know when they're being abused.

 

[ll74]

I call them anything I damn well please.

Have I said anything about the asylum laws? But I know when they're being abused.

Yes, you demonstrate the horrible person you are. I called you out for that. Thanks for doubling down.

You mentioned the percentage of asylum seekers denied.

 

[schism666]

My ancestors arrived here before this was even a nation. Ended up taking the place over. Why? Well the folks that lived here didn't have an immigration policy let alone enforce it.

i'm sure they're proud that their heritage lives on in the form of an alcoholic racist moron.

 

[Chobham]

Yes, you demonstrate the horrible person you are. I called you out for that. Thanks for doubling down.

You mentioned the percentage of asylum seekers denied.

Yeah, I'm a horrible person. What I'm not is a double talking hypocrite, like the mayors of NYC, DC, Chicago, etc. Oh, I understand we can now add Quebec to the list of mealy mouthed hypocrites. The list is growing every day.

They are illegal aliens, criminals to be redundant. International law and convention calls on them to apply for asylum at the first nation they can safely access and that would be Mexico. Of course they don't because they know that the Mexican government will deport them immediately. So they make their way to our border to suck up resources meant for our citizens.

And then there's the old, "they just want a better life for themselves and their children." That's about as moronic a plea as I've ever heard. Just how many people do you know, from ANYWHERE, that sit around dreaming of, "a worse life for themselves and their children?" You'd have to be brain dead to buy into that horse shit. But those that are supporting this invasion of criminals are essentially dreaming just that, "a worse life for themselves and their children (and everyone else's children to boot)."

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

hate speech isn't covered under 1a.

Most offensive language that people would consider hate speech is protected under 1A as long as it doesn’t represent a credible threat against a person or group, or incite violence.

 

[ll74]

Yeah, I'm a horrible person. What I'm not is a double talking hypocrite, like the mayors of NYC, DC, Chicago, etc. Oh, I understand we can now add Quebec to the list of mealy mouthed hypocrites. The list is growing every day.

They are illegal aliens, criminals to be redundant. International law and convention calls on them to apply for asylum at the first nation they can safely access and that would be Mexico. Of course they don't because they know that the Mexican government will deport them immediately. So they make their way to our border to suck up resources meant for our citizens.

And then there's the old, "they just want a better life for themselves and their children." That's about as moronic a plea as I've ever heard. Just how many people do you know, from ANYWHERE, that sit around dreaming of, "a worse life for themselves and their children?" You'd have to be brain dead to buy into that horse shit. But those that are supporting this invasion of criminals are essentially dreaming just that, "a worse life for themselves and their children (and everyone else's children to boot)."

Sounds like you have some grievances.

The migrants have a right to claim asylum. That's in the law that Congress passed and the President signed. The court system is not capable of handling the number of cases currently waiting for trial.

There are multiple ways to handle the human beings that are due a fair trial while they wait for their case.

As for whether you consider any of these human beings worthy of their day in court, I think your words say enough. The law allows them to claim asylum if they are inside our border.

If you want a different law, then lobby for one.

 

[schism666]

Most offensive language that people would consider hate speech is protected under 1A as long as it doesn’t represent a credible threat against a person or group, or incite violence.

calling a black person a nigger or a mexican a wetback is inciting violence. just as is throwing up a nazi salute.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

calling a black person a nigger or a mexican a wetback is inciting violence. just as is throwing up a nazi salute.

Reprehensible and revolting, yes. But if it does not incite violence it’s protected. Most hateful speech is protected.

 

[Chobham]

Sounds like you have some grievances.

The migrants have a right to claim asylum. That's in the law that Congress passed and the President signed. The court system is not capable of handling the number of cases currently waiting for trial.

There are multiple ways to handle the human beings that are due a fair trial while they wait for their case.

As for whether you consider any of these human beings worthy of their day in court, I think your words say enough. The law allows them to claim asylum if they are inside our border.

If you want a different law, then lobby for one.

You sound like a broken record. If they can get to a port of entry without passing through another eligible nation or make application at a US embassy or consulate then they are entirely within their rights. Ignoring international law just because the current administration is turning a blind eye doesn't make it legal, or right.

And for the moron's that are trying their best to make this all about color. So far the illegals represent 80+ different nations. Asia, Europe, the Mid East, South and Central America, Africa, the Caribbean, and Oceania. They are of every color and creed imaginable and I make NO distinction between them.

As a side note, the Mexican national population here in the US have been self-deporting for 10 years now, a net negative immigration pattern. The reason for this is that Mexico is in the midst of industrialization. Their prospects of advancement are better in Mexico than they are here in the US. Mexico is not admitting ANY immigrants because they happen to be a sane nation that is putting their own citizens first. Does that make them evil?

 

[ll74]

You sound like a broken record. If they can get to a port of entry without passing through another eligible nation or make application at a US embassy or consulate then they are entirely within their rights. Ignoring international law just because the current administration is turning a blind eye doesn't make it legal, or right.

And for the moron's that are trying their best to make this all about color. So far the illegals represent 80+ different nations. Asia, Europe, the Mid East, South and Central America, Africa, the Caribbean, and Oceania. They are of every color and creed imaginable and I make NO distinction between them.

As a side note, the Mexican national population here in the US have been self-deporting for 10 years now, a net negative immigration pattern. The reason for this is that Mexico is in the midst of industrialization. Their prospects of advancement are better in Mexico than they are here in the US. Mexico is not admitting ANY immigrants because they happen to be a sane nation that is putting their own citizens first. Does that make them evil?

If they are within the border and claim asylum, their case is heard.

You can bitch about it all you want. There are multiple ways to do it and they chose that one.

The word evil is a religious term....not my thing. I don't live in Mexico, but if I did, I'd lobby to change their immigration laws if those laws denied people asylum or other avenue of migration.

You consistently obfuscate what you are arguing. Immigration, and its many facets, is a complex issue. Human beings are not cockroaches. Immigration laws are not immutable. Countries have a right to change their laws. The US law allows asylum claims within the border.