LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Hotwife/Slutwife captions and fantasies

screwher said:
Nothing would please me more. As he sits in anticipation on our couch, I pull my wife to her feet. First I unbutton her pants. Slowly lower them and she steps out of them. He gets his first gaze at my wife in her panties. Sexy red and matching the bra he’s going to see right away. I turn her to face him. From behind I slowly lift her shirt up and off of her. She’s now only wearing the sexy new underwear we bought earlier that afternoon specifically for this moment. I unsnap her bra. Her beautiful breasts come into his view. He stares intently. Now the Main Event. I hook my fingers on either side of her panties and slowly slide them down. Her bare pussy comes into view and his eyes widen. With my wife fully naked I say “Take her. Fuck her. She wants you bad!” With that he takes my wife’s hand and escorts her up to our bedroom!
Click to expand...
I wish I was her. That made me wet
 
policywank said:
I agree. In addition to safety we deal with a very different and more judgmental societal environment so we are more motivated to be discrete. I think that this is part of what creates some distorted perceptions. Women who do have more adventurous sex lives are highly motivated to be discrete and in control. Just looking at the outward behaviours of women versus men doesn't provide an accurate gauge of their actual attitudes and sexual activity.
Click to expand...
It is natural for women to enjoy sex. Way back in the stone age and in some primitive societies , women were quite willing to expand the gene pool.
 
bilash said:
open marriage like polyamorous relationship ?
nonmonogamy =/= poly
Well you guys know what will work best for you.
I find nonmonogamy like swapping swinging hotwifing cucking more safe than poly.
NRE is the cause.
Click to expand...
Kind of in between. Technically poly but hierarchical, which irritates a lot of poly people. We want to remain a committed couple living together. Neither of us do well with casual sex so hoping to find FWB, ideally themselves part of other poly married couples. Yeah, I know, good luck finding that,
 
PhoenixRyzing said:
Kind of in between. Technically poly but hierarchical, which irritates a lot of poly people. We want to remain a committed couple living together. Neither of us do well with casual sex so hoping to find FWB, ideally themselves part of other poly married couples. Yeah, I know, good luck finding that,
Click to expand...
I wish my wife would agree to meet with you!
 
Islander55 said:
It is natural for women to enjoy sex. Way back in the stone age and in some primitive societies , women were quite willing to expand the gene pool.
Click to expand...

Agreed. I have often made the case that the whole women are wired to want monogamy so we have someone to support and protect us premise is flawed. The patriarchy put us at risk and denied access to the means to make a living so that we would be compelled to seek out monogamy for the benefit of men. Without artificially impose constraints we would be expanding the gene pool and enjoying a diverse sex life as much or more so than men.
 
policywank said:
Agreed. I have often made the case that the whole women are wired to want monogamy so we have someone to support and protect us premise is flawed. The patriarchy put us at risk and denied access to the means to make a living so that we would be compelled to seek out monogamy for the benefit of men. Without artificially impose constraints we would be expanding the gene pool and enjoying a diverse sex life as much or more so than men.
Click to expand...
I can't recommend the book "Sex at Dawn" highly enough (if you're interested in pop anthropology about sexuality). For our closest relatives, bonobos, female "promiscuity" is the norm, and sex is shared for social bonding purposes much like food. Their groups are highly cooperative, and instead of males competing for access to mates, the idea is their sperm competes when females have sex with multiple males. The authors make a strong case that this may have been the typical situation for early human hunter-gatherer societies, and that the whole focus on monogamy and particularly on female purity and chastity and fidelity is totally tied in with the rise of agriculture and private property and the need to determine paternity in order to pass things on to the correct offspring.
 
PhoenixRyzing said:
I can't recommend the book "Sex at Dawn" highly enough (if you're interested in pop anthropology about sexuality). For our closest relatives, bonobos, female "promiscuity" is the norm, and sex is shared for social bonding purposes much like food. Their groups are highly cooperative, and instead of males competing for access to mates, the idea is their sperm competes when females have sex with multiple males. The authors make a strong case that this may have been the typical situation for early human hunter-gatherer societies, and that the whole focus on monogamy and particularly on female purity and chastity and fidelity is totally tied in with the rise of agriculture and private property and the need to determine paternity in order to pass things on to the correct offspring.
Click to expand...
That seems completely plausible. While wandering after herds and eating what was at hand, there was no reason to stake your claim to much of anything except your own weapons and equipment.
 
PhoenixRyzing said:
I can't recommend the book "Sex at Dawn" highly enough (if you're interested in pop anthropology about sexuality). For our closest relatives, bonobos, female "promiscuity" is the norm, and sex is shared for social bonding purposes much like food. Their groups are highly cooperative, and instead of males competing for access to mates, the idea is their sperm competes when females have sex with multiple males. The authors make a strong case that this may have been the typical situation for early human hunter-gatherer societies, and that the whole focus on monogamy and particularly on female purity and chastity and fidelity is totally tied in with the rise of agriculture and private property and the need to determine paternity in order to pass things on to the correct offspring.
Click to expand...

Interesting. I will have a look at that. The whole premise that women are "hardwired" to be more sexually restrained than men has long seemed suspect to me. It seems as though there are two variations on this theme both of which are flawed. The first is the idea that it is in our DNA and always has been. The second is that we have evolved to adapt to our environment over many generations and millennia (evolutionary psychology), so even if our sexual inclinations are a product of our environment and the environment changes, any incremental change our sexual proclivities will occur at the pace of evolution.

But when we look at modern data in terms of female attitudes towards sex and monogamy things have changed dramatically within 50 years. The primary environmental changes are that women have become more equal and been given better access to the ability to make a living. The ability to plan pregnancy or not and embrace sex for pleasure has been greatly enhanced. Acceptance of misogynist attitudes and public shaming of female sexual liberation has become less acceptable. Oppressive religious moralizing has waned. I am sure there are some more than I am missing.

The actual observed behaviour is that once the things in our environment that compelled women to have a more restrained attitude towards sex were removed or altered, our attitudes towards sex and embrace of our own sexual liberation happened almost instantly in evolutionary terms. That suggests we never were hardwired to have the restrained view towards sex that prevailed in the recent past and if our attitudes have evolved over the millennia it certainly wasn't toward being the patriarchal stereotype of female sexuality.

If we were hardwired to be much more sexually restrained there would be no need for patriarchal society to oppress and control female sexuality. The oppression and control exists (or existed) because the female desire for sexual liberation was always right under the surface.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MaturemanAJ
A question for hotwife couples
2 3
Replies
53
Views
3K
Beachsyrf
Beachsyrf
V
who's your favorite hotwife erotica author
Replies
5
Views
640
Scareltt
Scareltt
B
  • Locked
Real life incest.
Replies
19
Views
4K
Dangerousliaisons
D
MaturemanAJ
Tell us about things that trigger daily fantasies
5 6 7
Replies
161
Views
5K
stargame
stargame
L
Do you have any fantasies/kinks where you aren't turned on in the moment, but are later on?
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
stevey42
S
Back
Top