IrezumiKiss
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Posts
- 74,229
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorryt, Derpy. YOu have NO logic. You are the liar.
As for calling you something - an idiot, a fool? Yes.The evidence of your stupidity is in almost everything you post. You make a ridiculous statement which is disproved. You don't accept that your statement is wrong. It is disproved again so you call those who put forward the evidence liars. Your statement is challenged again so you go straight to ad hominem and call everyone names. You can't win because you cannot accept that you are ever wrong.
Anything else is your ascription and YOUR Ad Hominem. I have never and will never call you anything but what you are - a multiply proven idiot.
I would invite you to reread the thread and see where you went off the rails and hard onto the irrelevant recycling ramp, but I must admit I’d prefer you not to because watching you double down on derp is far more entertaining!
I don't believe anyone cares what your partner does with her bull. Just sayin'.
More futile ascription from Derpy. I haven't said any such thing about a wall. That's just a Derpy lie.Let's take a look at a couple of examples, shall we?
Example #1:
Me: We need a border wall, it will cut down on illegal immigration.
You: Walls don't work. Just look at China's great wall.
Example #2:
You: We need gun bans, they will cut down on gun deaths.
Me: Gun bans don't work. Just look at every city/nation which has tried them.
You: Gun bans do too work, they cut down on gun deaths in every place they've been implemented.
Me: So, places like NYC, Chicago, New Orleans have fewer gun deaths now that they've banned guns? And what about Australia? How do you explain the gun deaths there?
You: That's just Derp from a liar.
That sound about right to you? Or do you really think that we're not talking opposite sides of the same coin here?
In the end, your argument never changes. You want what you want and damn all the logic which tells you that you're wrong. When you're finally cornered you do what all rats do, you lash out in anger with Ad Hom attacks and slanders because you don't have the courage to admit you're wrong. Which proves that you're a coward.
Nice try at a goal post move and attempt to deny your derpitude!The fact that you seem to think my comments have to stay on topic in any thread was mildly amusing for the first 15 microseconds. Then I realized that you were just being stupid again.
I'm not sure this came off the way you wanted it to.At least my partners like their bull. Which is more than I suspect your partner will say.
He learned about Que's cuckold lifestyle and thought, "I want that!"I'm not sure this came off the way you wanted it to.
Or maybe it did![]()
One can only hope Derpy suffers the same fate as Que.He learned about Que's cuckold lifestyle and thought, "I want that!"![]()
What happened to Que?One can only hope Derpy suffers the same fate as Que.
See, this is where your bullshit hits the fanclub.More futile ascription from Derpy. I haven't said any such thing about a wall. That's just a Derpy lie.
Derpy believes that if gun restrictions don't prevent ALL and every gun death - they are useless. Just Derpy stupidity and he won't look at the data because it shows he's a liar.
YOUR argument never changes. You keep defending a lie that NO gun restrictions have any effect anywhere and won't accept that you might be wrong, and try to ascribe views to your opponents that they haven't expressed - the strawman argument.
You are totally illogical, and when challenged resort to insults. Coward yourself, clutching your penis extension you don't know how to use.
Lol, I see you're still trying the one upsmanship game and failing at it.Nice try at a goal post move and attempt to deny your derpitude!
Accept your failure Harpy. You didn’t just stray off topic, which is fine, but you but you based your whole argument and defense on a false premise of your own making.
All of which makes it hilarious when you call other people stupid!![]()
Au contraire, I‘m just commenting on your flail and failLol, I see you're still trying the one upsmanship game and failing at it.
Oh, I’m very aware that I don’t control the interwebs or who says what/when/where.You don't control the interwebs. You don't decide who says what, when and where. It's cute that you think that you do, but you don't.
An admission that you're not the guy in charge is an admission that I can say whatever I want (with the rule set of the site) and YOU don't have squat to say about it.Au contraire, I‘m just commenting on your flail and fail
Oh, I’m very aware that I don’t control the interwebs or who says what/when/where.
But you making these comments means you either don’t understand the original and real issue or that you are attempting to move the goal post so far afield as to confuse the issue. Based on your post history I’ll go with you not understanding. I’m sure the litsters laughing at you will agree.
I’m thinking you’re the king of ascription because you can’t keep track of a back and forth so you just spout random shit that doesn’t follow what’s been said and so doesn’t make senseAn admission that you're not the guy in charge is an admission that I can say whatever I want (with the rule set of the site) and YOU don't have squat to say about it.
Yet here you are trying to be the Lit hall monitor anyway.
I’m thinking you’re the king of ascription because you can’t keep track of a back and forth so you just spout random shit that doesn’t follow what’s been said and so doesn’t make sense
Thanks for the confirmation that I’m correctLook at you trying to be all rational while lounging around in your unreality.
I'd bet dollars to donuts one of the three...What happened to Que?
This is a dumb point made dumber by coming from a lawyer.See, this is where your bullshit hits the fanclub.
That you didn't mention a wall in no way invalidates AN EXAMPLE of your own hypocrisy. That you have to try to ascribe your bullshit to the examples only shows how weak your arguments are.
You squirm.
Gun restrictions have NEVER reduced crime. Countries with gun bans and restrictions STILL have gun violence. You assert that it's "reduced" yet for some reason mass shootings seem to happen with about the same frequency as it does in the US when you take out all the crap statistics the gun ban crowd want to throw into the discussion.
Basically, you cook the numbers to show something favorable to your argument while totally undermining it at the same time.
Which only goes to prove that your entire narrative is and always has been bullshit. The question is why you keep on hawking that crap to everyone even though we all KNOW it's nothing but a lie.
The answer is obvious. Coward.
So dumb I didn't even bother responding, and full of lies. He won't look at the data that proves him wrong. Idiot!This is a dumb point made dumber by coming from a lawyer.
It's odd for a lawyer to claim that laws are irrelevant. I guess that's why he posts here instead of message boards perused by successful lawyers.So dumb I didn't even bother responding, and full of lies. He won't look at the data that proves him wrong. Idiot!