It's "Twitter Freedom Friday!"

Some points about the pizza box:

  • It's made of paper/cardboard which takes fossil fuels to make.
  • It can't be recycled as paper because the grease/oil on/in it make that impossible.
  • Delivery requires fossil fuels.
  • Manufacturing requires fossil fuel.
  • Manufacturing the machines to make and deliver it requires fossil fuel.
  • Repairing/maintaining the machines to make and deliver it requires fossil fuel.
For those who snark that we can use electricity for all of that, no we can't because some of it requires fossil fuels to GENERATE the electricity, make the generators, and so on. Worse, the water impounds we're using to generate what electricity we do use are drying up. Once that happens, we'll be in an electricity shortage with no way out.

If you're incapable of understanding that, then YOU'RE part of the problem not the solution.
So counselor, you would be laughed out of court for focusing on actual recycling issues surrounding the pizza box instead of what the pizza box represented.

Because you missed the point by miles I will clue you in. Thunberg made a tiny dick joke at Tate, which he couldn’t tolerate. So he tweeted back and for some reason included the pizza box on the table. The pizza box allowed police to locate him and arrest him and his brother on charges of sex trafficking. So thunbergs recycling comment was not actually about recycling per se, but about what a dumbass Tate actually was for inadvertently leading authorities to his door. Which, by the way, probably gives him the mind fucks given his misogyny.

And so, Harpy, thank you for upholding the reputation you have worked so hard to establish here on Lit by yet again missing the actual point and focusing on an irrelevancy.
 
So counselor, you would be laughed out of court for focusing on actual recycling issues surrounding the pizza box instead of what the pizza box represented.

Because you missed the point by miles I will clue you in. Thunberg made a tiny dick joke at Tate, which he couldn’t tolerate. So he tweeted back and for some reason included the pizza box on the table. The pizza box allowed police to locate him and arrest him and his brother on charges of sex trafficking. So thunbergs recycling comment was not actually about recycling per se, but about what a dumbass Tate actually was for inadvertently leading authorities to his door. Which, by the way, probably gives him the mind fucks given his misogyny.

And so, Harpy, thank you for upholding the reputation you have worked so hard to establish here on Lit by yet again missing the actual point and focusing on an irrelevancy.

But Greta’s tweet wouldn’t have been allowed as evidence in a court of law or something, something, something…….

👉 Harpy 🤣

🇺🇸
 
So counselor, you would be laughed out of court for focusing on actual recycling issues surrounding the pizza box instead of what the pizza box represented.

Because you missed the point by miles I will clue you in. Thunberg made a tiny dick joke at Tate, which he couldn’t tolerate. So he tweeted back and for some reason included the pizza box on the table. The pizza box allowed police to locate him and arrest him and his brother on charges of sex trafficking. So thunbergs recycling comment was not actually about recycling per se, but about what a dumbass Tate actually was for inadvertently leading authorities to his door. Which, by the way, probably gives him the mind fucks given his misogyny.

And so, Harpy, thank you for upholding the reputation you have worked so hard to establish here on Lit by yet again missing the actual point and focusing on an irrelevancy.

Wait, a discussion on the viability of recycling pizza boxes as part of green movement ideology is irrelevant to a discussion on the viability of recycling pizza boxes as part of the green movement ideology?

Remind me again what planet you're from?
 
Wait, a discussion on the viability of recycling pizza boxes as part of green movement ideology is irrelevant to a discussion on the viability of recycling pizza boxes as part of the green movement ideology?
You STILL don’t get it! Thanks for the morning laugh! 😂

Remind me again what planet you're from?
The carbon based one. You, however, once again prove you are from planet clueless and are doing it proud!
 
You STILL don’t get it! Thanks for the morning laugh! 😂


The carbon based one. You, however, once again prove you are from planet clueless and are doing it proud!

Oh no I get it. You'd rather deny facts and engage in Ad Hom insults than admit you're wrong because you HAD to oppose something someone said based on your political ideology framework rather than reality.

I think most of the rest of the Litsters who read your crap "get it" too.
 
Oh no I get it. You'd rather deny facts and engage in Ad Hom insults than admit you're wrong because you HAD to oppose something someone said based on your political ideology framework rather than reality.

I think most of the rest of the Litsters who read your crap "get it" too.
Sorry, Derpy. That's what you do and why you are a laughing stock.
 
Sorry, Derpy. That's what you do and why you are a laughing stock.

Hmmm... Seems I'm not alone in using that particular debate technique.

Nor are you as pure as driven snow on the issue either so I'd be careful about tossing those rocks, you might hit your own window.

Of course you'd probably blame me for it breaking if you did. Because backwards topsy turvy world.



Now about those defensive gun uses statistics you denied but which are at least equal to the number of gun deaths...

Are you sure you want to take guns away from all those people so that they can't defend themselves from the bad guys?
 
Oh no I get it.
Clearly not.

You'd rather deny facts and engage in Ad Hom insults than admit you're wrong because you HAD to oppose something someone said based on your political ideology framework rather than reality.
No, I addressed Thornbergs comment in the context it was posted. You went off on some irrelevant recycling tangent.

I think most of the rest of the Litsters who read your crap "get it" too.
Au contraire, please note how the litsters are amused by you doubling down on derp!
 
Now about those defensive gun uses statistics you denied but which are at least equal to the number of gun deaths...
No they're not, Derpy, by a large factor.

People might claim to have defended themselves with a firearam but there are no credible statistics.

I am not suggesting that gun cointrol is introduced in the US. That is probably a political impossibility. I am disputing your claim that gun controls don't and cannot work, when the overwhelming evidence from countries that have gun controls is that they do.
 
Last edited:
Clearly not.


No, I addressed Thornbergs comment in the context it was posted. You went off on some irrelevant recycling tangent.


Au contraire, please note how the litsters are amused by you doubling down on derp!

No, No, No……

Do not explain precisely where Harpy lost the plot.

When you do that ^ the derp stops, and, subsequently, the laughs stop.

I want to hear more about how much Carbon based water is wasted to recycle cardboard pizza boxes.

👉 Harpy 🤣

🇺🇸
 
Wait, a discussion on the viability of recycling pizza boxes as part of green movement ideology is irrelevant to a discussion on the viability of recycling pizza boxes as part of the green movement ideology?

Remind me again what planet you're from?

At least my stuff goes on dates. Unlike some...

Oh no I get it. You'd rather deny facts and engage in Ad Hom insults than admit you're wrong because you HAD to oppose something someone said based on your political ideology framework rather than reality.

I think most of the rest of the Litsters who read your crap "get it" too.

Hmmm... Seems I'm not alone in using that particular debate technique.

Nor are you as pure as driven snow on the issue either so I'd be careful about tossing those rocks, you might hit your own window.

Of course you'd probably blame me for it breaking if you did. Because backwards topsy turvy world.



Now about those defensive gun uses statistics you denied but which are at least equal to the number of gun deaths...

Are you sure you want to take guns away from all those people so that they can't defend themselves from the bad guys?
You lied and got blown up for your efforts. Stop trying to save face, it isn't working.
 
No they're not, Derpy, by a large factor.

People might claim to have defended themselves with a firearam but there are no credible statistics.

I am not suggesting that gun cointrol is introduced in the US. That is probably a political impossibility. I am disputing your claim that gun controls don't and cannot work, when the overwhelming evidence from countries that have gun controls is that they do.

The statistics exist. That you refuse to acknowledge them doesn't make them vanish.

That is why your ideas don't and won't work. It's why you have to waffle and walk back the statements you make. It's why you lie and engage in hypocrisy in order to cover up the false narrative.

But you don't care about any of that because you have an agenda. You don't care if your agenda is good or bad, it's yours and you're going to do and say whatever it takes to get it implemented.

And I'll stand up and oppose your crap every time.
 
Clearly not.


No, I addressed Thornbergs comment in the context it was posted. You went off on some irrelevant recycling tangent.


Au contraire, please note how the litsters are amused by you doubling down on derp!

Lol, Greta was referenced in this thread BECAUSE OF the pizza box recycling thing and you fucked that up like you ALWAYS do.

But thanks for playing.
 
No, Derpy. YOU fucked up as you alwats do.

Face it Ogg, your bullshit was finally exposed. You have no logic or reason, only bullshit and a temper tantrum.

I'm waiting on the post where you decide to go all in and be just like luk and call me a rapist. It's about all you haven't done in this debate to try and deflect away from the fact that you're pushing lies and then lying about that too.
 
ad ho·mi·nem
/ˌad ˈhämənəm/

adjective
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
"vicious ad hominem attacks"


derp
/dərp/

exclamation
  1. used as a substitute for speech regarded as meaningless or stupid, or to comment on a foolish or stupid action.
    "Lower tax rates and far lower job creation. Derp"
noun
  1. foolishness or stupidity.
    "the derp heard outside apparently was only the tip of the iceberg"
 
Face it Ogg, your bullshit was finally exposed. You have no logic or reason, only bullshit and a temper tantrum.

I'm waiting on the post where you decide to go all in and be just like luk and call me a rapist. It's about all you haven't done in this debate to try and deflect away from the fact that you're pushing lies and then lying about that too.
Sorryt, Derpy. YOu have NO logic. You are the liar.

As for calling you something - an idiot, a fool? Yes.The evidence of your stupidity is in almost everything you post. You make a ridiculous statement which is disproved. You don't accept that your statement is wrong. It is disproved again so you call those who put forward the evidence liars. Your statement is challenged again so you go straight to ad hominem and call everyone names. You can't win because you cannot accept that you are ever wrong.

Anything else is your ascription and YOUR Ad Hominem. I have never and will never call you anything but what you are - a multiply proven idiot.
 
Last edited:
Lol, Greta was referenced in this thread BECAUSE OF the pizza box recycling thing and you fucked that up like you ALWAYS do.

But thanks for playing.
I would invite you to reread the thread and see where you went off the rails and hard onto the irrelevant recycling ramp, but I must admit I’d prefer you not to because watching you double down on derp is far more entertaining!
 
Back
Top