Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wear flannel, blue jeans and work boots. Does that count?![]()
![]()
![]()
LOL. I'm always dressed that way, since I'm on-call 24/7/365.Oh yeah, it's all contextual within the culture when you think about it. Display behavior is display behavior, but unlike every other species, we make our own displays rather than growing pink stripes on our fur or whatever so the underlying behavioral pattern is to display and attract. Cultural context determines how effective that display is. In Manhattan or London it might be a bespoke suit. Where I live it'd be flannel, blue jeans, boots and an F150 or Dodge Ram, depending. LOL. A suit would get you laughed at, but that's the cultural context. My dad now, he does the suit stuff really well, but he does the jeans and boots too. Now me, I love lingerie. It's fun.
All the genetic research on this is fascinating when you start reading. I've just blown a couple of hours on this.
But your definition of perfection isn't mine.Those silly strings are meant to obscure body imperfections. If you have a pair of perfect breasts, you don't need accessories to lift them or make them stand out. If you have perfect hips, you don't need thongs to emphasize their contours, and so on...
Yes, men are Visual creatures, factory setting, so to speak. That doesn’t explain the fascination of g-strings, negligées and such. Why isn’t nude tops?
Let’s see if I can provide some geezer perspective, along the lines of what colddiesel posted. In the U.S., before the mid-fifties, a man’s opportunity to see a woman’s undraped skin might have been limited to the marriage bed or a burlesque show (which often was limited by blue laws). In day-to-day life, he might get (as immortalized in song) a glimpse of stocking, and this might have established this man’s excitement level (even with the legs of Betty Grable, among others, freely revealed).I'm so ancient that I remember when women wore suspender belts for their nylons (stockings). Younger girls tended to call them 'roll ons' The best thing about them was that taking them off was a pretty un-equivocal message that even dummies like the younger me understood.
I did not have much grasp of English until I had been at school a few years and when I was eight or nine I asked, in complete innocence, my otherwise all female family, "what are these roll on things." Whatever, it earned me boxed ears from both elder sisters and mum. Later I learned to appreciate whatever came into view and not ask too many questions.
Not all of usSo you read all this bullshit about women not dressing to attract men and the like, but at its heart, it's designed to visually appeal to the male of the species and incentivize him to get it up, get it on, and make babies!!!!! And THAT is deep-rooted in our genes.
A piece of art might be dazzling in itself, but the right frame can elevate it. I think of lingerie as a frame. And that's not to objectify women; it's to point out that a woman appearing in lingerie is seeking visual impact, just as an artist is.
Plus, putting that shit on takes time and effort. That's time and effort a lover can appreciate a woman spending. Lastly, I know that many women in lingerie feel like men when they put on a proper suit: it makes you carry yourself differently, more confidently.
1) If a woman is willing to wear it, it says a lot about her mood.
2) It can be seen as an enhancment of her figure.
Women wear lingerie to cover up imperfections.What I'm about to say is a bit controversial, but that's what I'm here for.
I am completely blind to lingerie (as well as any extracorporeal appendages such as jewelry and tattoos). Those silly strings are meant to obscure body imperfections. If you have a pair of perfect breasts, you don't need accessories to lift them or make them stand out. If you have perfect hips, you don't need thongs to emphasize their contours, and so on...
I'm not judging, I can understand where it's coming from, but as someone who has a sharp discernment when I come across those things, it's hard not to feel pity. The visual stimulus may be relevant for the beginning of seduction, but from the moment we are “into it” no additions will help. If there is no intimacy, closeness, and real attraction—nothing will help.
Lingerie is somehow tolerable, but high heels by no means! There is nothing more ridiculous and strange to me than this madness. If an alien were to watch women walking on crutches for no reason other than to stick out their butt, he would burst out laughing. Any woman who imposes this torture on herself is not a real woman as far as I'm concerned.
Meanwhile, men: “Let’s see. I shaved yesterday… Oh, jeez! I wonder if I have to wear a tie?”Lingerie selection says a lot about what parts of a woman she wants to emphasize and show off, and how she wants to display it. Most of my date-bait stuff, or "gift-wrap" as one partner put it, has been selected with great care.. a difference in a half an inch in where the top of front panel is in a pair of panties, the degree of sheerness in a bra, a particular shade of red or blue, are all factors in whether I buy that particular article or wear it at that particular time. And it's not just for how men react. If I want to feel good about myself, a well-chosen set of undergarments helps a lot.
In chapter 11 of We're a Wonderful Wife Tam buys some lingerie to wear for her husband on a special occasion, but her husband is blind. There will be more discussion of it in Chapter 12, but Tam explains that although he can't see with his eyes, he can see with his fingers and the different textures are a big turn on to him, and his "looking her over" is quite exciting for her. She also says that it's a turn on for her getting dressed up for him in something that he loves and she likes that he never asks to do it with the lights on.Is it that women wearing such feel sexier and that mood carries over? Mystery? Gift-wrapping? Is it that, by donning such, women are openly acknowledging their sexuality?