Trump takes the Fifth!

[ll74]

She was the First Lady, a senator and Secretary of State, had a secret clearance and briefed on classified material security protocol, intent my ass.

Intent is important in regards to the law.

 

[zipman]

This is a lie. Flat out, in your face, lie.

Evidence Hillary Clinton broke the law

FBI Director admits Hillary broke the law

Yes, Hillary broke the law; no, she won't be prosecuted for it


The list of citations goes on and on and on... Your statement to the contrary is a lie.

He posted " Quid Pro Quo, skimming, theft, blackmail, fraud"

They did investigate the Clinton Gibson and found zero evidence of any wrongdoing against the foundation.

Facts matter.

 

[butters]

He posted " Quid Pro Quo, skimming, theft, blackmail, fraud"

They did investigate the Clinton Gibson and found zero evidence of any wrongdoing against the foundation.

Facts matter.

yes. yes they do.

 

[HisArpy]

He posted " Quid Pro Quo, skimming, theft, blackmail, fraud"

They did investigate the Clinton Gibson and found zero evidence of any wrongdoing against the foundation.

Facts matter.

They do. Unfortunately for YOU, your attempt to "reimagine" the facts at large here, aren't what you originally said.

"Clinton Gibson" and "the foundation" isn't "Hillary."

You LIED. You know you LIED.

 

[jomar]

Here's the part you leave out because you're either a dupe, or a dope...

In order to have the opportunity to assert your 5th Amendment Rights, you *ahem* have to be investigated and "questioned under oath."

Something Hillary never was despite James Comey finding that there was probable cause to believe that she broke the law.

So which is it; are you a dupe, or a dope?

You're not making sense again. Are you sure you're responding to my post?

Well, Comey’s comment that no prosecutor in their right mind would prosecute Hillary’s case, was 1st, not within his purview, that decision lies with AG Lynch who was compromised by her meeting with Bill Clinton. If the justice department doesn’t do their due diligence then it’s a disservice to the American people.

I'm happy for the DOJ to do its thing and let the chips fall.

Sussmann was tried in a DC court with a jury biased towards Hillary and an activist judge who would not allow evidence implicating Hillary which was the thrust of Durhams case, Sussmann walked.

And trump pardoned his criminal cronies. Well, not Cohen, because he wasn't loyal.

Playing the system doesn’t equate to justice

I don't believe I ever made that claim.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

What Arguing With Hizzarpee Is Like, Illustrated

YOU: Here is a red Lego brick.

https://www.lapetitebrique.com/11279/lego-spare-parts-brick-2x4-red.jpg

HIM: That ISN'T a red Lego. It's NOT even a "brick." It's a Lego PIECE that's just a molded piece of red-colored plastic constructed to be a kids' toy, it's not ACTUALLY a red brick. You LIED.

HIM (furthering his exasperation): It's not EVEN a "Lego." Lego IS THE NAME OF THE COMPANY. You know you LIED.

 

[HisArpy]

What Arguing With Hizzarpee Is Like, Illustrated

YOU: Here is a red Lego brick.

https://www.lapetitebrique.com/11279/lego-spare-parts-brick-2x4-red.jpg

HIM: That ISN'T a red Lego. It's NOT even a "brick." It's a Lego PIECE that's just a molded piece of red-colored plastic constructed to be a kids' toy, it's not ACTUALLY a red brick. You LIED.

HIM (furthering his exasperation): It's not EVEN a "Lego." Lego IS THE NAME OF THE COMPANY. You know you LIED.

Look, everybody! Even zoom zoommity can learn. Hopefully that habit will eventually sink in and take root.

 

[HisArpy]

You're not making sense again. Are you sure you're responding to my post?

It's not my fault you're so fucked in the head to the point you don't even know what you're saying half the time.

BTW, saying someone isn't making sense is the ultimate failback position used whenever you know you fucked yourself but can't find a way to get out of it.

 

[KeithD]

Harpo is letting this send him off the deep end, isn't he?

 

[icanhelp1]

You're not making sense again. Are you sure you're responding to my post?



I'm happy for the DOJ to do its thing and let the chips fall.



And trump pardoned his criminal cronies. Well, not Cohen, because he wasn't loyal.

Weissmann went over the top with the Mueller investigation, he hated Trump and used the Mueller investigation to exact hatred and revenge on anything Trump. Weissmann pulled all the strings in the Mueller investigation which explains why the Steele dossier and anything Clinton was flagrantly left out. When Trump was found not to be involved in a Russian conspiracy the investigation should have been closed but Weissmann reverted back to his unethical tactics such as obstruction of justice for a crime that didn’t exist to insure it landed in Nadler and Schiff’s lap for impeachment. You’ll excuse me for not having much faith in our justice system. IG Horowitz wrote thousands of papers revealing how corrupt the FBI was when it came to sworn affidavit and the procurement of FISA warrants. He referred Comey for prosecution but it fell through the cracks.

I don't believe I ever made that claim.

 

[HisArpy]

Harpo is letting this send him off the deep end, isn't he?

Failback position #2 for the incompetent.

 

[HisArpy]

Weissmann went over the top with the Mueller investigation, he hated Trump and used the Mueller investigation to exact hatred and revenge on anything Trump. Weissmann pulled all the strings in the Mueller investigation which explains why the Steele dossier and anything Clinton was flagrantly left out. When Trump was found not to be involved in a Russian conspiracy the investigation should have been closed but Weissmann reverted back to his unethical tactics such as obstruction of justice for a crime that didn’t exist to insure it landed in Nadler and Schiff’s lap for impeachment. You’ll excuse me for not having much faith in our justice system. IG Horowitz wrote thousands of papers revealing how corrupt the FBI was when it came to sworn affidavit and the procurement of FISA warrants. He referred Comey for prosecution but it fell through the cracks.

What's funny is that they know this. Getting them to actually say it is a different story because it destroys their entire narrative and exposes their never ending hypocrisy.

Thus, they lie by omission while proclaiming themselves to be arbiters of truth as they point the finger of blame everywhere except at themselves.

 

[jomar]

It's not my fault you're so fucked in the head to the point you don't even know what you're saying half the time.

BTW, saying someone isn't making sense is the ultimate failback position used whenever you know you fucked yourself but can't find a way to get out of it.

I think it’s past time for you to schedule an appointment with a neurologist.

 

[jomar]

Weissmann went over the top with the Mueller investigation, he hated Trump and used the Mueller investigation to exact hatred and revenge on anything Trump. Weissmann pulled all the strings in the Mueller investigation which explains why the Steele dossier and anything Clinton was flagrantly left out. When Trump was found not to be involved in a Russian conspiracy the investigation should have been closed but Weissmann reverted back to his unethical tactics such as obstruction of justice for a crime that didn’t exist to insure it landed in Nadler and Schiff’s lap for impeachment. You’ll excuse me for not having much faith in our justice system. IG Horowitz wrote thousands of papers revealing how corrupt the FBI was when it came to sworn affidavit and the procurement of FISA warrants. He referred Comey for prosecution but it fell through the cracks.

I always thought once the trigger got pilled the Mueller investigation needed to be done to completion no matter the outcome simply for the good of the nation. Why is it unethical to call out trumps obstruction to an investigation. The findinns of the actual investigation is irrelevant to the obstruction.

 

[icanhelp1]

I always thought once the trigger got pilled the Mueller investigation needed to be done to completion no matter the outcome simply for the good of the nation. Why is it unethical to call out trumps obstruction to an investigation. The findinns of the actual investigation is irrelevant to the obstruction.

Process crimes that are not material to the actual criminal investigation is not exactly what I would call equal and fair application of the law. it’s like changing the original argument to win an argument, any argument! When conspiracy was the predicate for opening the investigation and the findings resolve that issue any continuation of the investigation in the hopes of some kind of entrapment I always thought was considered prosecutorial malfeasance, it then becomes a process in search of a crime, it would be thrown out of a traditional court. Weissmann knew that. He knew that under the existing political climate if he claimed obstruction he could insure congress under Pelosi, Nadler and Schaffer would have an excuse to proceed with an impeachment.

 

[jomar]

Process crimes that are not material to the actual criminal investigation is not exactly what I would call equal and fair application of the law. it’s like changing the original argument to win an argument, any argument! When conspiracy was the predicate for opening the investigation and the findings resolve that issue any continuation of the investigation in the hopes of some kind of entrapment I always thought was considered prosecutorial malfeasance, it then becomes a process in search of a crime, it would be thrown out of a traditional court. Weissmann knew that. He knew that under the existing political climate if he claimed obstruction he could insure congress under Pelosi, Nadler and Schaffer would have an excuse to proceed with an impeachment.

Fair enough.

I don't know the rules of such things, but I'd think if including the obstruction component wasn't squarely within the guidelines that Muellor, boy scout that he is, would have pulled it. Though now that I recollect, seems that such investigations write their own rules?

 

[icanhelp1]

Fair enough.

I don't know the rules of such things, but I'd think if including the obstruction component wasn't squarely within the guidelines that Muellor, boy scout that he is, would have pulled it. Though now that I recollect, seems that such investigations write their own rules?

Fair enough.

I don't know the rules of such things, but I'd think if including the obstruction component wasn't squarely within the guidelines that Muellor, boy scout that he is, would have pulled it. Though now that I recollect, seems that such investigations write their own rules?

Something else to think about, the J6 DOJ agent is now the agent supervising this debacle. The fact that the Hunter Biden investigation is in slow motion lends itself to conspiracy theory. If the investigation on the Hunter Biden laptop proves criminal behavior did exist when dealing with Ukraine, Barisma as well as the forced firing of Shokin this would prove that Trump’s impeachment was a smoke screen and would exonerate Trump, would prove Trump was correct at pointing out corruption with the Bidens and Ukraine. Monumental setback for Pelosi and her merry band of idiots.

if you notice the echo chamber between the media and the DOJ is ramping up, can tell wha’s fact and what’s fiction, who’s feeding who.

 

[zipman]

They do. Unfortunately for YOU, your attempt to "reimagine" the facts at large here, aren't what you originally said.

"Clinton Gibson" and "the foundation" isn't "Hillary."

You LIED. You know you LIED.

Take a deep breath.

You're moving the goalposts. The past I replied to was about the foundation. That's what I was discussing.

If you're too stupid to understand that it's not problem.

 

[jomar]

Something else to think about, the J6 DOJ agent is now the agent supervising this debacle. The fact that the Hunter Biden investigation is in slow motion lends itself to conspiracy theory. If the investigation on the Hunter Biden laptop proves criminal behavior did exist when dealing with Ukraine, Barisma

Hunter could have been involved with sketchy stuff. His laptop has gotten around, who knows what was originally on it.

as well as the forced firing of Shokin

Biden did use money to leverage the firing of Shokin. Shokin was corrupt and NOT investigating corruption, that’s why he was booted. Biden was backed by other countries. He and other countries did not oust Shokin to protect Hunter and the Burisma stuff. That’s been settled done and dusted.

this would prove that Trump’s impeachment was a smoke screen and would exonerate Trump,

Nothing of the sort. Trumps impeachment was the result of him wanting a political favor before funds were released. Capisce?

would prove Trump was correct at pointing out corruption with the Bidens and Ukraine. Monumental setback for Pelosi and her merry band of idiots.

If there was then let the chips fall. Joe’s not pure white snow after a lifetime in politics, but he’s savvy enough not to get pinned behind the eight ball. I think it’s a lot of wishful thinking by the trumpers.

if you notice the echo chamber between the media and the DOJ is ramping up, can tell wha’s fact and what’s fiction, who’s feeding who.

You read the tea leaves better than me, then.

 

[icanhelp1]

Hunter could have been involved with sketchy stuff. His laptop has gotten around, who knows what was originally on it.



Biden did use money to leverage the firing of Shokin. Shokin was corrupt and NOT investigating corruption, that’s why he was booted. Biden was backed by other countries. He and other countries did not oust Shokin to protect Hunter and the Burisma stuff. That’s been settled done and dusted.



Nothing of the sort. Trumps impeachment was the result of him wanting a political favor before funds were released. Capisce?



If there was then let the chips fall. Joe’s not pure white snow after a lifetime in politics, but he’s savvy enough not to get pinned behind the eight ball. I think it’s a lot of wishful thinking by the trumpers.



You read the tea leaves better than me, then.

Perhaps read this tale on Barisma, Shokin and the Bidens, it gives another perspective, a back door kind of way why the FBI and the DOJ are deliberately slow walking the Hunter Biden investigation.

Keep in mind Wray's last testimony with the Senate judiciary 4 days ago. He stated he was unaware that whistleblowers came forward and told Grassley that the agent in charge of the Hunter Biden's laptop investigation was filing evidence as disinformation.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaig...memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story/

 

[jomar]

Perhaps read this tale on Barisma, Shokin and the Bidens, it gives another perspective, a back door kind of way why the FBI and the DOJ are deliberately slow walking the Hunter Biden investigation.

Keep in mind Wray's last testimony with the Senate judiciary 4 days ago. He stated he was unaware that whistleblowers came forward and told Grassley that the agent in charge of the Hunter Biden's laptop investigation was filing evidence as disinformation.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaig...memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story/

Unfortunately, that’s a three year old opinion piece by a probably once respected journalist who became a trumper protecting trump at the expense of others. If there was any there there three years is a lifetime to make something stick. Why didn’t it? Innuendo and misdirection doesn’t make a case.

 

[Pad_Foot]

Why wasn't Trump impeached the first time??
The Republicans protected their own.
Period
Partisan Politics, just like they said!
Trump was doing Putin's bidding.
SURE Trump provided arms to the Ukrainians, but they were NOT allowed to use them against Russia. Why??

The second Impeachment?? Same deal.

Don't assume you will ever get Dems to turn on their own, but fuck, if a Dem did what Trump did, I would back you on tossing his ass in jail, or at least taking ALL his or her wealth, and kicking them out of America. Hmmm... ? All their family members as well!!

Why didn't these Republicans have the same balls as those who faced Nixon??

 

[icanhelp1]

Unfortunately, that’s a three year old opinion piece by a probably once respected journalist who became a trumper protecting trump at the expense of others. If there was any there there three years is a lifetime to make something stick. Why didn’t it? Innuendo and misdirection doesn’t make a case.

The Hunter laptop supports Solomon’s findings. You have to realize Hunter’s laptop goes back 3 years

 

[jomar]

The Hunter laptop supports Solomon’s findings. You have to realize Hunter’s laptop goes back 3 years

Yes, and his laptop has been gangbanged. Experts can’t tell what’s what so how can it support Solomon’s biased findings?

 

[jaF0]

Why wasn't Trump impeached the first time??

He was.

The second time too.