LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

January 6th Prosecution vs. Trump - Loving Updates

coati said:
You have more posts in two years than I have in 9 years.
Click to expand...

Does this mean that everyone with more posts than me is an “incel”?

What if I sleep with 20-40 women a year? Still an “incel”?

You’re not very happy, coati… everything okay?
 
rockcasbah said:
I said “both sides” because I meant what I said in a non-partisan general sense about the USA itself.

You’re all complicit.
Click to expand...
Nancy Pelosi selected the committee members. Nancy is biased as well as everyone on the board. Dems hate Pubs and PUB hate DEMS. Dems are in the majority so they win. As divisive and partisan as the Benghazi hearings were it was conducted within accepted house rules 12 members 7 PUBS and 5 DEMs, selected by their respective party leadership. Of course DEMs called the whole investigation a colossal waste of time and money and look at them now, KABUKI theatre at its best. I can't remember one committee since the Clinton impeachment that hasn't formed along partisan lines and accomplished absolutely nothing. I must add that Trey Gowdy acted in a very professional manner as chairman while Adam Schitt whined like a 3 year old.
 
icanhelp1 said:
Nancy Pelosi selected the committee members.
Click to expand...

That's not quite how it went. You've been told this before.

McCarthy want to put Banks and Jordan on the committee, two trump loyalists who were in the thick of things and likely to be subpeoned investigated by the comittee. She was correct in rejecting them. McCarthy could have chosen others but took his ball and went home. So the panel mix is on him, not Pelosi.
 
DOJ filing exposes bannon's game
Late last night the DOJ dropped a bomb with a filing that pretty much exposed Bannon's desperate little scheme.
Click to expand...
Authorities revealed that one of Donald Trump's lawyers, Justin Clark, testified to the FBI on June 28 that Trump never invoked executive privilege for Bannon in the first place. That certainly was not helpful to Bannon's defense and it may explain why Bannon and his lawyers moved to delay his trial the next day. The filing went into all the reasons why the executive privilege claim was always specious and concludes with this slap down:
"All of the above-described circumstances suggest the Defendant's sudden wish to testify is not a genuine effort to meet his obligations but a last-ditch attempt to avoid accountability."
Click to expand...

Tuesday's questioning will be led by Stephanie Murphy, D-Fl., and Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and there will be live witnesses — although only one has been named, a former spokesman for the right-wing militia group Oath Keepers. Jason Van Tatenhove will reportedly discuss the group's radicalization and attraction to Donald Trump.
Click to expand...
Even if he does testify, Bannon would not be off the hook because it doesn't change the fact that he did defy the subpoena for all these months.
First of all, there is absolutely no reason to believe that Bannon has any intention of testifying honestly. Trump's embarrassing letter makes it clear what he expects and there's little doubt that Bannon is on exactly the same page. All you have to do is watch some of his "War Room" podcasts to know that. So any thoughts that this is a sudden change of heart are absurd. This is nothing more than a ploy to delay his impending trial, which he has been trying to do since June 30 when he requested that it be moved to October claiming that he can't get a fair hearing because of the committee hearings.
Click to expand...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=49474ab23ec4452d89ca726322e537ab
 
rockcasbah said:
What if I sleep with 20-40 women a year? Still an “incel”?
Click to expand...
Nahhh, that would probably mean that you don't "sleep" with anyone and are just as much of a pathological liar as Trump. Paying for professional services does not count.

I've witnessed the way that you talk to women on Lit. Your personality is toxic.
 
coati said:
I've witnessed the way that you talk to women on Lit. Your personality is toxic.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that whole top ten hall of fame thing was rigged.

Keep trying, with a winning approach like yours, you shouldn’t have any trouble meeting someone right for you!
 
jomar said:
That's not quite how it went. You've been told this before.

McCarthy want to put Banks and Jordan on the committee, two trump loyalists who were in the thick of things and likely to be subpeoned investigated by the comittee. She was correct in rejecting them. McCarthy could have chosen others but took his ball and went home. So the panel mix is on him, not Pelosi.
Click to expand...
There you go again.
 
icanhelp1 said:
Nancy Pelosi selected the committee members. Nancy is biased as well as everyone on the board. Dems hate Pubs and PUB hate DEMS. Dems are in the majority so they win. As divisive and partisan as the Benghazi hearings were it was conducted within accepted house rules 12 members 7 PUBS and 5 DEMs, selected by their respective party leadership. Of course DEMs called the whole investigation a colossal waste of time and money and look at them now, KABUKI theatre at its best. I can't remember one committee since the Clinton impeachment that hasn't formed along partisan lines and accomplished absolutely nothing. I must add that Trey Gowdy acted in a very professional manner as chairman while Adam Schitt whined like a 3 year old.
Click to expand...
Yep. Pelosi exercised her power as speaker. Now she owns the J6 show.
 
BabyBoomer50s said:
Yep. Pelosi exercised her power as speaker. Now she owns the J6 show.
Click to expand...
She sure makes it just about impossible for both parties to come together on things. They hate Trump and everything the (D)s do revolves around bagging Trump. SAD
 
Legal experts have said Rhodes' testimony could show a link between the militia and the Trump White House. Jackson has also faced allegations of having ties to the group.

Court documents filed in April showed that members of the Oath Keepers discussed plans to protect Jackson during the riot because he had important data to protect, according to a letter published by the committee. A text message from members of the Oath Keepers read: "Dr. Ronnie Jackson - on the move. Needs protection. If anyone inside cover him. He has critical data to protect."
Click to expand...
"The Oath Keepers and Proud Boys had contacts with a number of other individuals with whom you may also have been in contact. If you had no contact with the individuals who sent these messages, who else would have informed them of your security needs or your location?" the letter read.
Click to expand...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=57c3bfb656d843eb8654bde443c9a9eb

https://twitter.com/x/status/1546128757869658113
 
icanhelp1 said:
She sure makes it just about impossible for both parties to come together on things. They hate Trump and everything the (D)s do revolves around bagging Trump. SAD
Click to expand...
So you have no issue with both the Senate and McCarthy passing on Republican involvement when they had the chance.
 
rockcasbah said:
Should the Committee only call people who fit within the plan?
Click to expand...
why not, that's what they have done so far, and any witnesses that either couldn't or wouldn't follow the professionally written, produced and directed Hollywood tv script; also when the casting call was unable to find tv friendly personalities to read the script, they would just allow unsubstantiated hearsay testimony to sound like eyewitness testimony evidence.
 
coati said:
You have more posts in two years than I have in 9 years. You literally live on this board lately. Canadian incels are just as pathetic as the American variety.
Click to expand...
Maybe he's got hacker life, and an epic "Halle Berry: like bj motivation keeps up his posting/word counts.

1657572777194.png
 
dmonty said:
why not, that's what they have done so far, and any witnesses that either couldn't or wouldn't follow the professionally written, produced and directed Hollywood tv script; also when the casting call was unable to find tv friendly personalities to read the script, they would just allow unsubstantiated hearsay testimony to sound like eyewitness testimony evidence.
Click to expand...
1. This isn't a trial
2. The televised testimony is derived from a large amount of testimony edited down to bite sized portions and then presented for clarity and to avoid non-related portions.
 
ll74 said:
1. This isn't a trial
2. The televised testimony is derived from a large amount of testimony edited down to bite sized portions and then presented for clarity and to avoid non-related portions.
Click to expand...
and almost entirely consists of republicans who were fore and centre of trump's administration... his own 'homies'
 
jomar said:
It's like they have the truth on ignore.
Click to expand...
it's the only way they can maintain the reality of their alternative existence; it's simply too hard for them, mentally and emotionally, to accept they've been lied to by the very people they revere
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

RoryN
Deplorable mascot, #1 Trump fanboy "QAnon Shaman": Then vs Now
Replies
7
Views
112
stxjimmy
S
RoryN
In efforts to prioritize American needs, the Trump DOJ...begins investigation of January 6th prosecutors. lol
Replies
1
Views
86
ll74
ll74
eric_erosfan
January 6 Enemies. Find them here
8 9 10
Replies
248
Views
4K
eric_erosfan
eric_erosfan
butters
Jan 6th defendant who got sentenced to 17 years, only served 4 before trump commuted his sentence, is pissed at trump
Replies
15
Views
124
Saint_Ann
Saint_Ann
butters
Trump Administration Fires Top Copyright Official Days After Firing Librarian of Congress
Replies
3
Views
186
Lazaran
L
Back
Top