January 6th Prosecution vs. Trump - Loving Updates

[ll74]

She will be kicked out of the speakership because the GOP is going to win the House in November.

Stefanik will be speaker

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

And McCarthy completely pulled all of his picks instead of replacing them with two others. Pelosi would've accepted their replacements and if he didn't replace them, she already accepted the rest.

And if the Celtics had the authority to veto Steph Curry and Kevin Looney and exercised it in the NBA championship series, the Warriors would have happily played along. Pelosi vetoed two members of the GOP lineup, abandoned traditional rules and protocols, and hired a TV consultant. McCarthy chose not to play her game.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Stefanik will be speaker

Possibly. It won’t be Nancy.

 

[rockcasbah]

And if my grandmother had wheels, she’d be a bus!

- Jean Chretien

 

[icanhelp1]

And if the Celtics had the authority to veto Steph Curry and Kevin Looney and exercised it in the NBA championship series, the Warriors would have happily played along. Pelosi vetoed two members of the GOP lineup, abandoned traditional rules and protocols, and hired a TV consultant. McCarthy chose not to play her game.

Pelosi weaponized the house political majority = tyranny, it's legal but unethical, unfortunately Pelosi doesn't have an ethical bone in her body. Pushing for abortion goes against the strictest canon of her catholic faith. She places herself above the teachings of her own faith while chiding pro-life. Insisting she's a devout catholic while breaking canon law, she's a divisive power hungry tyrant and hypocrite. She broke the house and November can't come fast enough

A fact finding commission should have zero active politicians on board. Pelosi refusing the minority chair's selection is basically insisting that the minority party genuflect to the whims of the majority. Pelosi broke with precedent by not following traditional house rules. She used impeachment for her own vengeful agenda, an impeachment that broke along party lines where red flags popped up all over the house. Pelosi is a tyrant. The left whined about the high court not following precedent, not abiding by stare decisis when the decision didn't go their way but are OK with breaking precedent when it suits their agenda.

 

[rockcasbah]

So… Trump Good, Pelosi Bad?

Gotcha!

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Pelosi weaponized the house political majority = tyranny, it's legal but unethical, unfortunately Pelosi doesn't have an ethical bone in her body. Pushing for abortion goes against the strictest canon of her catholic faith. She places herself above the teachings of her own faith while chiding pro-life. Insisting she's a devout catholic while breaking canon law, she's a divisive power hungry tyrant and hypocrite. She broke the house and November can't come fast enough

A fact finding commission should have zero active politicians on board. Pelosi refusing the minority chair's selection is basically insisting that the minority party genuflect to the whims of the majority. Pelosi broke with precedent by not following traditional house rules. She used impeachment for her own vengeful agenda, an impeachment that broke along party lines where red flags popped up all over the house. Pelosi is a tyrant. The left whined about the high court not following precedent, not abiding by stare decisis when the decision didn't go their way but are OK with breaking precedent when it suits their agenda.

And in five months she will receive her pink slip.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Pelosi vetoed Jordan and Banks.

So what?

McCarthy had the ability to replace them with other Republicans. Are you saying he could find no other qualified members to sit on the committee out of the remaining 206? If that is true, it doesn't say a lot about the "quality" of Republicans then I guess.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Stefanik will be speaker

Anyone besides McCarthy, the guy is proving to be a fool of a leader. Who else would dumb enough to not sit members on a committee investigating something as serious as Jan 6th? You'd have to be a complete fool to not want to have access to the inside information, in advance of it hitting media....I never thought he was good choice to replace Ryan. History has shown me to be correct I think.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

So what?

McCarthy had the ability to replace them with other Republicans. Are you saying he could find no other qualified members to sit on the committee out of the remaining 206? If that is true, it doesn't say a lot about the "quality" of Republicans then I guess.

It says that Pelosi abandoned House rules and protocols, and that McCarthy didn’t play along. Sorry, but that’s what happened no matter how you choose to spin it.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

It says that Pelosi abandoned House rules and protocols, and that McCarthy didn’t play along. Sorry, but that’s what happened no matter how you choose to spin it.

Spin what? That McCarthy took his ball and went home? I agree with that 100%. That was his choice, not Pelosi's....and unless you are a blind partisan tool, there is no other way to see it......oh wait, look who can't see it.

 

[jomar]

No! You don’t get it. If ya want to get to the bottom of things ya have to have people on the commission that are neutral and non political not a gaggle of Pelosi hatchet conspirators. Democracy is equal justice under the law not a show trial put on by a bunch of self indulging, self righteous, constitutional loathing shithouse lawyers.

…

A fact finding commission should have zero active politicians on board. Pelosi refusing the minority chair's selection is basically insisting that the minority party genuflect to the whims of the majority. Pelosi broke with precedent by not following traditional house rules. She used impeachment for her own vengeful agenda, an impeachment that broke along party lines where red flags popped up all over the house. Pelosi is a tyrant. The left whined about the high court not following precedent, not abiding by stare decisis when the decision didn't go their way but are OK with breaking precedent when it suits their agenda.

In an ideal world a jury of peers and all. But McCarthy fucked up for your side by first placing insurrectionists on the committee and when they were rightly rejected by Pelosi not replacing them, which he could have easily done, so he could cry “partisan”! Which is your manufactured, by McCarthy, precedent breaking buhshit.

And as the committee rolls out evidence we are seeing that trump was rightly impeached. And yes it was along party lines because republicans failed by putting party (trump) over country. Again.

 

[rockcasbah]

Political theatre.

Garland won’t likely charge a Pres with a crime

Trump was voted out

The people have spoken

Everyone already knows what he’s about.

 

[icanhelp1]

In an ideal world a jury of peers and all. But McCarthy fucked up for your side by first placing insurrectionists on the committee and when they were rightly rejected by Pelosi not replacing them, which he could have easily done, so he could cry “partisan”! Which is your manufactured precedent breaking buhshit.

And as the committee rolls out evidence we are seeing that trump was rightly impeached. And yes it was along party lines because republicans failed by putting party (trump) over country. Again.

It seem that a jury of peers only works for democrats in DC

There are no charges of insurrection. This commission is a witch hunt. Some of the most
important responsibilities for this commission is to find out how the capital was left so vulnerable, evaluating SOPs, chain of command issues, military and civilian liaison.

Let the DOJ do it’s thing.

He cried partisan because it is. Pelosi never takes issue with the other party, she pushes her majority rule and disregards the other half of the country. It’s showing up big time in the poll. It’s her agenda or no agenda at all.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

He cried partisan because it is.

Wow, I agree with you. McCarthy refused to seat any members, after two out of five were rejected and he can correctly say it was a partisan decision.

 

[jomar]

There are no charges of insurrection.

You know what I mean. McCarthy’s rightly rejected appointees were in the thick of things and, according to your argument, subpoenaed witnesses shouldn’t be a part of an investigation.

This commission is a witch hunt.

Only if you don’t give a shit about the constitution and institutions.

Some of the most important responsibilities for this commission is to find out how the capital was left so vulnerable, evaluating SOPs, chain of command issues, military and civilian liaison.

Yep.

Let the DOJ do it’s thing.

When it’s their turn, yes.

He cried partisan because it is.

If it is it’s because he chose not to replace his rightly rejected appointees.

Pelosi never takes issue with the other party, she pushes her majority rule and disregards the other half of the country. It’s showing up big time in the poll. It’s her agenda or no agenda at all.

So you’re saying she’s the house equivalent of McConnell. Got it.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Spin what? That McCarthy took his ball and went home? I agree with that 100%. That was his choice, not Pelosi's....and unless you are a blind partisan tool, there is no other way to see it......oh wait, look who can't see it.

Yes, after Pelosi vetoed the opposing teams starting lineup and re-wrote the rule book. Thanks for acknowledging you agree 100%.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Yes, after Pelosi vetoed the opposing teams starting lineup and re-wrote the rule book. Thanks for acknowledging you agree 100%.

Please show me any rules Pelosi re-wrote. And yes I agree 100%, McCarthy refused to fill the allotted seats. Pelosi never told him he couldn't, unless you can also show me where she did, maybe include it with the "house rules" she broke/re-wrote.

 

[rockcasbah]

So you’re saying she’s the house equivalent of McConnell. Got it.

Exactly. A politician doing her job.

Tissues, anyone?

 

[ll74]

And if the Celtics had the authority to veto Steph Curry and Kevin Looney and exercised it in the NBA championship series, the Warriors would have happily played along. Pelosi vetoed two members of the GOP lineup, abandoned traditional rules and protocols, and hired a TV consultant. McCarthy chose not to play her game.

That's a truly dumb analogy. He chose not to be involved. She chose two alternatives for him.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Please show me any rules Pelosi re-wrote. And yes I agree 100%, McCarthy refused to fill the allotted seats. Pelosi never told him he couldn't, unless you can also show me where she did, maybe include it with the "house rules" she broke/re-wrote.

I will let you go back and review rules and protocols adopted for past House committees. Find one where the majority leader rejected the minority party selections if you wish.

 

[jaF0]

Stefanik will be speaker

Eva will have them Goosestepping in formation.

 

[ll74]

I will let you go back and review rules and protocols adopted for past House committees. Find one where the majority leader rejected the minority party selections if you wish.

Probably need to figure out where it says she can't reject any selection first.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Probably need to figure out where it says she can't reject any selection first.

Never said she lacked authority to disregard for past rules and precedent. She had the authority to do so and she exercised. That’s why McCarthy balked, and why the committee is in lockstep with no adversarial examination. She also had the authority to hire a media consultant to assist with scripting and orchestration of the TV production. Not complaining. Just explaining. It’s a political production.

 

[phrodeau]

And if my grandmother had wheels, she’d be a bus!

- Jean Chretien

https://www.yiddishwit.com/gallery/wagon.html