LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

January 6th Prosecution vs. Trump - Loving Updates

LukSkyFokker said:
Except we're not racist drunk idiots who want another Civil War. We also haven't paid for wives or killed our children. Other than that, exactly the same.
Click to expand...
Circle jerks in this forum make me laugh regardless of who works off each other.
 
KennyMc had 210 names to pick from. Why did he pick those that were under suspicion of being involved?
 
ll74 said:
The rules were defined. She said no to two and Republicans pulled them all.

Fuck off...they made their choice...nobody forced that hand . Based on what's been revealed...they did so politically.

McCarthy had an opportunity to have a cross examination and he literally said no.


And that was after the Senate also had the same choice.
Click to expand...
No need to throw a tantrum. She rejected past rules and protocols.
 
BabyBoomer50s said:
No need to throw a tantrum. She rejected past rules and protocols.
Click to expand...
No, she didn't at all. McCarthy rejected his role and blamed Pelosi. And you believe his horseshit.

Any past minority would've nominated two other reps for the committee and moved along.
 
ll74 said:
No, she didn't at all. McCarthy rejected his role and blamed Pelosi. And you believe his horseshit.

Any past minority would've nominated two other reps for the committee and moved along.
Click to expand...
Lol. She literally vetoed two members of the opposing team’s lineup. I get that you didn’t like the roster either. She disregarded House rules and protocols. It is what it is.
 
BabyBoomer50s said:
Lol. She literally vetoed two members of the opposing team’s lineup. I get that you didn’t like the roster either. She disregarded House rules and protocols. It is what it is.
Click to expand...
Fucking round and round with you.

She did exactly what was within her power to do based on conflicts of interest.

McCarthy had an opportunity to replace the two with two others and INSTEAD withdrew them all.

Her actions were within the rules of the committee. Stop saying they weren't.

And before all of this shit..Republicans passed on the opportunity to investigate in a bipartisan independent committee. That was THEIR FUCKING CHOICE
 
ll74 said:
Fucking round and round with you.

She did exactly what was within her power to do based on conflicts of interest.

McCarthy had an opportunity to replace the two with two others and INSTEAD withdrew them all.

Her actions were within the rules of the committee. Stop saying they weren't.

And before all of this shit..Republicans passed on the opportunity to investigate in a bipartisan independent committee. That was THEIR FUCKING CHOICE
Click to expand...
Yes. She had the power to disregard precedent, veto the other sides lineup, and hire a media consultant. And McCarthy had the power to not play that game. Hence a one-sided, made for TV docudrama.
 
ll74 said:
Fucking round and round with you.
Click to expand...
*chuckles*, well what else can boomer do. He has no factual leg to stand on, just weak sauce deflection.
ll74 said:
She did exactly what was within her power to do based on conflicts of interest.
Click to expand...
And who can argue against that, you do not put people on a committee who may be witness, or participant in what the committee is looking into.
ll74 said:
McCarthy had an opportunity to replace the two with two others and INSTEAD withdrew them all.
Click to expand...
Yep,a real stupid move, by taking his ball and going home, he lost all inside access to behind those closed doors...He's a real smart dude eh?
ll74 said:
Her actions were within the rules of the committee. Stop saying they weren't.
Click to expand...
Again, what else does he have. Either he can list those rules, which state the Speaker can't, or he can...so far, he can't it seems.
ll74 said:
And before all of this shit..Republicans passed on the opportunity to investigate in a bipartisan independent committee. That was THEIR FUCKING CHOICE
Click to expand...
lol.....they though it would fall off the radar.
 
BabyBoomer50s said:
Yes. She had the power to disregard precedent, veto the other sides lineup, and hire a media consultant. And McCarthy had the power to not play that game. Hence a one-sided, made for TV docudrama.
Click to expand...
Yes, and it is one-side due to McCarthy. Pelosi never said the republicans couldn't sit as the minority. Who was it it pulled the republicans again? Made it one-sided?
 
jomar said:
We get it. You sit at the 50 yard line on he MAGA bleachers. Blame the select committee on hatred of trump, not protecting democracy. That plays best with the base who cheer the BIG LIE.
Click to expand...
No! You don’t get it. If ya want to get to the bottom of things ya have to have people on the commission that are neutral and non political not a gaggle of Pelosi hatchet conspirators. Democracy is equal justice under the law not a show trial put on by a bunch of self indulging, self righteous, constitutional loathing shithouse lawyers.
 
icanhelp1 said:
No! You don’t get it. If ya want to get to the bottom of things ya have to have people on the commission that are neutral and non political not a gaggle of Pelosi hatchet conspirators. Democracy is equal justice under the law not a show trial put on by a bunch of self indulging, self righteous, constitutional loathing shithouse lawyers.
Click to expand...
*chuckles*
Sure, Mr "I don't carry water for Trump"....sure.
 
BabyBoomer50s said:
This is unlike any commission that’s come before it. Nothing like the Benghazi hearings for example. In those hearings, Speaker Boehner had 5 Democrats on the panel picked by Nancy Pelosi. One of them was Adam Schiff who devoted much of his time to demanding the committee be disbanded. This one has no adversarial format. It’s scripted and produced with the aid of a TV consultant, and all members are in lockstep.

Pelosi’s first mistake was breaking a long standing rules and practice dictate by vetoing two of McCarthy’s selections. As Politico noted at the time, “Her decision sent shock waves through the House.”
Click to expand...
Pelosi will be kicked out of the speakership having the worst record in the history of house speakers. What has Nancy accomplished, she used her political capital in a never ending rope-a-dope against Trump. That old gasbag needs to go.
 
icanhelp1 said:
Pelosi will be kicked out of the speakership having the worst record in the history of house speakers. What has Nancy accomplished, she used her political capital in a never ending rope-a-dope against Trump. That old gasbag needs to go.
Click to expand...
#whining

*chuckles*
 
BabyBoomer50s said:
Your comment illustrates the J6 problem. Pelosi doesn’t want adversarial arguments. Wants to present a scripted narrative with all committees members in lockstep.
Click to expand...
I dunno, I think appointing actual oath keepers rather than the fake ones McCarthy wanted was the better choice.
 
ll74 said:
And before all of this shit..Republicans passed on the opportunity to investigate in a bipartisan independent committee. That was THEIR FUCKING CHOICE
Click to expand...
What they really passed on was the opportunity to bollocks up and bog down the committee work from the inside. I'm surprised that McConnell didn't school McCarthy on that before McCarthy royally screwed up.
 
BabyBoomer50s said:
Pelosi vetoed Jordan and Banks.
Click to expand...
And McCarthy completely pulled all of his picks instead of replacing them with two others. Pelosi would've accepted their replacements and if he didn't replace them, she already accepted the rest.
 
icanhelp1 said:
Pelosi will be kicked out of the speakership having the worst record in the history of house speakers. What has Nancy accomplished, she used her political capital in a never ending rope-a-dope against Trump. That old gasbag needs to go.
Click to expand...
She will be kicked out of the speakership because the GOP is going to win the House in November.
 
Trump’s a sideshow clown who you never should have elected President.

But you did.

Maybe the USA needs a commission on Citizen Responsibility.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

RoryN
Deplorable mascot, #1 Trump fanboy "QAnon Shaman": Then vs Now
Replies
7
Views
124
stxjimmy
S
RoryN
In efforts to prioritize American needs, the Trump DOJ...begins investigation of January 6th prosecutors. lol
Replies
1
Views
91
ll74
ll74
eric_erosfan
January 6 Enemies. Find them here
8 9 10
Replies
248
Views
4K
eric_erosfan
eric_erosfan
butters
Jan 6th defendant who got sentenced to 17 years, only served 4 before trump commuted his sentence, is pissed at trump
Replies
15
Views
147
Saint_Ann
Saint_Ann
butters
Trump Administration Fires Top Copyright Official Days After Firing Librarian of Congress
Replies
3
Views
189
Lazaran
L
Back
Top