FBI: Deplorables are in BIG trouble and should be peeing themselves

Capitol rioter pled guilty to multiple federal charges on Friday, admitting to assaulting police officers with a baton he stole from one of them and bringing a loaded gun with him into the Capitol. He acknowledged he could have ended up in even more serious trouble, telling federal investigators he would “be here for another reason” if he had been able to find Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during the riot.
In the plea agreement, Mazza said that he wore a holster under his shirt to carry a revolver loaded with shotgun and hollow-point bullets as he attended the “Stop the Steal” rally at the ellipse and then later on the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, 2021, but lost the weapon at some point before he grappled with the police in the tunnel.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=88bf7b39a5184224bd69f6bbf422ada9
 
Trump announced that he would “look very, very seriously” at pardons for convicted Capitol rioters, if he gets elected.

Maybe he’ll consider who was really to blame.
 
Wouldn't that be the cat's tits if Kam did what the Giant Orange Toddler wanted Mikey to do?
 
What could Trump possible say if she did?
he'd have plenty to say.
regardless, if he actually did win legally, then i think plenty of people, dem or pub, would be outraged if the transition of power wasn't peaceful. She would be breaking the exact same codes of conduct even pence wouldn't stoop to.
 
he'd have plenty to say.
regardless, if he actually did win legally, then i think plenty of people, dem or pub, would be outraged if the transition of power wasn't peaceful. She would be breaking the exact same codes of conduct even pence wouldn't stoop to.
Trump maintained just the week that the VP has the power to select the next president.
If Trump legally won, and Harris picked someone else, Trump wouldn’t have any legal recourse, according to Trump.
 
Trump maintained just the week that the VP has the power to select the next president.
If Trump legally won, and Harris picked someone else, Trump wouldn’t have any legal recourse, according to Trump.
oh, i agree that it would be a case of do as i say not as i do with trump. no arguments there. i'm talking about reasonable, sane Americans.
 
violent magat refused plea deal, then later on took it, receives longer than usual sentence
A District of Columbia man was sentenced today to 63 months in prison for assaulting law enforcement officers during the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol – the same deal he refused to accept last July.

Mark Ponder, 56, received the longer-than-usual sentence among the rioters after pleading guilty April 22 to assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers using a dangerous weapon, the Department of Justice announced today. Following his prison term, he will be placed on three years of supervised release. He also must pay $2,000 in restitution.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...pc=U531&cvid=a2084edc14284116abaf53d6652309e6
 
I wouldn't be surprised to see the sentence lengths going up across the board now that we've seen such graphic evidence of how much of a violent mob it was.
 
I wouldn't be surprised to see the sentence lengths going up across the board now that we've seen such graphic evidence of how much of a violent mob it was.
yeah, starting with the small fry, working their way up the food chain. this particular cunt got a heavier sentence than he might have originally faced where he refused the plea deal to start and it took about a year (and the exposing of the additional evidence) for him to accept one.
 
the 3-percenter scumbag who threatened his family—"traitors get shot"—if they outed him gets sentenced to 7 years. son gives testimony against him.

"Guy Reffitt came to the Capitol on Jan. 6 armed and determined to instigate violence," Graves said in a statement. "He and others contributed to the many assaults on law enforcement officers that day, putting countless more people -- including legislators -- at risk."

US District Judge Dabney Friedrich sentenced Reffitt to 87 months in prison, the stiffest sentence meted out to a Capitol riot defendant so far.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...pc=U531&cvid=cd3b1fb42ee341e9acf2bcc4bcc77bf9
 
someone forgot to signal a turn and then made an 'evasive' move leading to a traffic stop. He was active in fighting the Capitol cops and entering the building, but it wasn't that or his involvement with an even more right-wing body, the patriot front that led to charges he's now looking at:
The driver was Michael Alan Jones, a 24-year-old North Carolina man, and his passenger was another man identified in court documents only as “PK.” What the deputies found in the Sentra was something akin to a mobile arsenal: “several knives, military surplus gear, and two compound bows.” Bolt-cutters protruded from a backpack on the floorboards of the passenger seat, where PK was sitting. Inside, the deputies found pry bars and gloves, leading them to believe they were looking at burglary tools. They also found ammunition and pepper spray in the vehicle.
When the deputies ran the plate they discovered the car wasn’t registered to Jones and had it towed. A further search of the vehicle revealed yet more hardware: Baofeng handheld radios, more knives, an Army Tactical Combat Casualty handbook, an AR-15 rifle and a 30-round magazine.
the traffic stop earlier this year determined that the AR-15 and magazine were in violation of the New York State SAFE Act due to modifications on the rifle. As a result, he was charged with criminal possession of a weapon.

The state charge attracted the attention of an FBI special agent in Rochester who discovered that Jones had been convicted of a felony in North Carolina in 2019. The conviction arose from a 2017 arrest in Alamance County for statutory sex offense when Jones was accused of having sex with a 15-year-old and a 14-year-old when he was 19 and 18, respectively. The discovery of Jones’ 2019 felony conviction in North Carolina resulted in a complaint in federal court in the Western District of New York on June 3 for knowingly and unlawfully possessing a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon.
sounds about right
piece of shit doesn't have a place to stay so didn't fight detention, plus he's eager to get a plea bargain

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/h...sedgntp&cvid=d0c9a19421614d0fc1471bc9f65ee058
 
Some of you, if not all of you, need to read the stories being posted in this thread and ask yourself;

If the government will expend the time, effort, and money to go after those people for those offenses, who's next on the chopping block when they run out of J6 offenders?

You perhaps? For whatever "crime" they can fabricate in order to justify it?
 
Some of you, if not all of you, need to read the stories being posted in this thread and ask yourself;

If the government will expend the time, effort, and money to go after those people for those offenses, who's next on the chopping block when they run out of J6 offenders?

You perhaps? For whatever "crime" they can fabricate in order to justify it?
They obstructed Congress and attacked the house of Congress. If they were Muslims, what would your position be? Or black? Or Mexican?

Fuck off.
 
Some of you, if not all of you, need to read the stories being posted in this thread and ask yourself;

If the government will expend the time, effort, and money to go after those people for those offenses,
So, you admit there are offenses. A beginning.


who's next on the chopping block when they run out of J6 offenders?

You perhaps? For whatever "crime" they can fabricate in order to justify it?
The rest of Donny's minions, so more likely you and the rest of the BBs than we Americans.
 
Some of you, if not all of you, need to read the stories being posted in this thread and ask yourself;

If the government will expend the time, effort, and money to go after those people for those offenses, who's next on the chopping block when they run out of J6 offenders?

You perhaps? For whatever "crime" they can fabricate in order to justify it?
This from the guy who said it would be legal for the government to kidnap people.
 
So, you admit there are offenses. A beginning.



The rest of Donny's minions, so more likely you and the rest of the BBs than we Americans.
"Offenses" are turning out to be whatever the government wants to accuse you of.

Here's an example:

The DOJ just accepted a plea from one of the J6 "insurrectionists" for carrying a gun in public.

This plea deal was reached approximately 4 weeks AFTER the US Supreme Court issued an opinion that the 2nd Amendment guarantees that the people have a Right to Bear Arms *ahem* in public *ahem* and that we don't have to ask permission from the government in order to do so.

So, in light of the Bruen decision, EXACTLY what "offense" does "carrying a gun in public" constitute which is sufficient for the government to bring charges under?

And, given that, do you believe that they cannot/will not do the same to others? Others like you or your friends/family if they so choose.
 
Back
Top