January 6th Prosecution vs. Trump - Loving Updates

[YDB95]

Ok. A couple. Hence the partisan stain.

The partisan stain was McCarthy's and McCarthy's alone.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

It was partisan because McCarthy rescinded all of his picks and then they all whined about it instead of just picking others

Sorry. When the majority party leader doesn’t let the minority party pick their team, it’s partisan. Just one of many miscalculations Dems made on this.

 

[YDB95]

Sorry. When the majority party leader doesn’t let the minority party pick their team, it’s partisan.

Do you have any objections to the reasons Pelosi cited for the two nominees she rejected? Are you even aware that she raised specific objections?

 

[ll74]

Sorry. When the majority party leader doesn’t let the minority party pick their team, it’s partisan. Just one of many miscalculations Dems made on this.

She let him pick and then dropped those who might be part of the investigation based on common knowledge for conflict is interest. He had the chance to replace them and instead chose not to participate

 

[jaF0]

I kind of wonder if Gymmie would have been allowed to be a disruptor, or if he might have been able to learn something useful.

 

[YDB95]

I kind of wonder if Gymmie would have been allowed to be a disruptor, or if he might have been able to learn something useful.

The saying, "There is none so blind as he who will not see" comes to mind. He wouldn't want to learn anything useful, ergo he wouldn't.

 

[ll74]

I kind of wonder if Gymmie would have been allowed to be a disruptor, or if he might have been able to learn something useful.

He would've dropped out when they required a jacket.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Do you have any objections to the reasons Pelosi cited for the two nominees she rejected? Are you even aware that she raised specific objections?

Yes, she didn’t want Jordan and Banks. They are Trump allies, she didn’t want their voices on the committee, and she overrode the minority leader. She put a giant partisan stamp on her forehead and that’s how it’s playing out. Partisan Dems are excited, the rest of country is focused on more important things.

 

[YDB95]

Yes, she didn’t want Jordan and Banks. They are Trump allies, she didn’t want their voices on the committee, and she overrode the minority leader.

No, the problem was not that they were Trump allies. If that were the issue, she would have rejected all of McCarthy's nominees, and she didn't.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

the rest of country is focused on more important things.

Remind the class just how much time, effort and taxpayer money your side spent on the MULTIPLE Benghazi hearings just to end with an "oh welp, theh Deep State was jest tew strawng fer us!"

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Remind the class just how much time, effort and taxpayer money your side spent on the MULTIPLE Benghazi hearings just to end with an "oh welp, theh Deep State was jest tew strawng fer us!"

Yes, same thing. Benghazi hearings were a rehash of old news. Nobody paid attention to those hearings either. These days people are paying attention to inflation, the bear market impact on their shrinking 401Ks, and increasing chances of a recession.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

No, the problem was not that they were Trump allies. If that were the issue, she would have rejected all of McCarthy's nominees, and she didn't.

She rejected 2. Huge gift to McCarthy, big blow to the committee. Just one of several blunders that led to her quandary

 

[Sean Renaud]

A lot of us paid attention to the Bengazi hearings wondering if there was something important here. We know from the ratings, at least of the first night that America is in fact dialed into this. Which is good, THIS is the most important thing actually happening right now.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Yes, same thing. Benghazi hearings were a rehash of old news. Nobody paid attention to those hearings either. These days people are paying attention to inflation, the bear market impact on their shrinking 401Ks, and increasing chances of a recession.

Why do you think that a sitting President calling for an insurrection isn't important to U.S. citizens?

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Why do you think that a sitting President calling for an insurrection isn't important to U.S. citizens?

And therein lies the committee’s biggest problem. They set expectations for these hearings that they’re already walking back.

 

[DeluxAuto]

And therein lies the committee’s biggest problem. They set expectations for these hearings that they’re already walking back.

What expectations did they lay out that they are now walking back?

 

[phrodeau]

What expectations did they lay out that they are now walking back?

He just says shit. It’s not worth the asking.

 

[YDB95]

She rejected 2. Huge gift to McCarthy, big blow to the committee. Just one of several blunders that led to her quandary

Once again you're just seeing what you want to see here. She had more than legitimate concerns about the two members she rejected, and she gave McCarthy the opportunity to name replacements. He chose to take his marbles and go home instead, and that's on him, period.

 

[KeithD]

Once again you're just seeing what you want to see here. She had more than legitimate concerns about the two members she rejected, and she gave McCarthy the opportunity to name replacements. He chose to take his marbles and go home instead, and that's on him, period.

And it turns out to be yet another stupid move McCarthy has made.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

What expectations did they lay out that they are now walking back?

It started when Jamie Raskin promised back in April that there would be revelations that “will really blow the roof off the House.” Then over the weekend Adam Schiff went Schiffting on TV. Something about evidence for indictments.

Fast forward to yesterday when Committee Chair Thompson said the panel will not make any criminal referral of former President Donald Trump or anyone else to the Justice Department. Someone is off-message. Lol.

The roof is still on the House. The committee and DOJ are pursuing diametrically opposite and contradictory legal objectives.

 

[phrodeau]

Yeah, because Trump once visited the House of Representatives. Makes loads of sense.

 

[DeluxAuto]

He just says shit. It’s not worth the asking.

Heh. That's why I asked and true to form he went on a tangent and never came back.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Fast forward to yesterday when Committee Chair Thompson said...

I see. So something important did happen and it was important enough for you to pay attention to the new developments.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Yes, same thing. Benghazi hearings were a rehash of old news. Nobody paid attention to those hearings either.

huh.

you musta been on one of those multiverse Earths during that time, then.

cuz your side was CATERWAULING over them shits damn near every day, lemme tells ya.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

I see. So something important did happen and it was important enough for you to pay attention to the new developments.

Something even more important than Thompson’s Democrat buzzkill did happen yesterday. The S&P closed 21.8% below where it stood just six months ago. Enjoy the hearings.