south dakota teacher hands out letters to trans students and their friends, wanting to 'save them'

[Chobham]

Society isn't law.

Maybe you should think that through a little deeper.

 

[Sh1ne0n67]

Maybe you should think that through a little deeper.

Not its forte...

Just another variation on chipbutty.


MOOO000ooo...

 

[Chobham]

I know, but maybe some reader will take the time.

 

[Rotadom]

Maybe you should think that through a little deeper.

Why? I'm right. Maybe you should articulate your position instead of playing little fuck-fuck games in hopes someone will think you're smart.

 

[DeluxAuto]

I found a bonafide groomer! Also a 3 time groom

View attachment 2145105

 

[butters]

not many people looking at those can see them as anything other than uber creepy. not in the least like a normal father-daughter thing. anyone totally unfamiliar with the two people would think them a man with his much younger girlfriend.

 

[coati]

Promoting violence against scum bags isn't against the rules.

Are you fucking retarded or something??

I was banned many times because management supports those scum bags who think harming kids is "activism".

Hey, Butters, thanks for starting a thread that ended the latest incarnations of BotanyBoy.

It still has not sunk into his skull that promoting violence against those who disagree with you is against Lit's rules.

 

[DimmuBurger]

Hey, Butters, thanks for starting a thread that ended the latest incarnations of BotanyBoy.

It still has not sunk into his skull that promoting violence against those who disagree with you is against Lit's rules.

I didn't do anything in this thread that violated the rules. Nowhere in the rules does it say that you can't promote or advocate violence.

The only rule I ever violated was not being woke and leftist enough for managements liking.

 

[ll74]

I didn't do anything in this thread that violated the rules. Nowhere in the rules does it say that, you need to read them.

The only rule I ever violated was not being woke and leftist enough for managements liking.

If you can get around banning, then they need something different to deter the behavior that gets you banned.

 

[Rotadom]

lol Lennie from Of Mice and Men is back. Doesn't he have some rabbits to tend to?

 

[DimmuBurger]

If you can get around banning, then they need something different to deter the behavior that gets you banned.

The mindset of totalitarian control freaks on grand display.

Not being a white male loathing leftist is what gets me banned.

How about a little open mindedness and DIVERSITY of thought??

Oh noez..... gawd forbid that!!! Can't have any of that free speech around, free speech is alt-reich fascism!!! LOL

 

[ll74]

The mindset of totalitarian control freaks on grand display.

Not being a white male loathing leftist is what gets me banned.

How about a little open mindedness and DIVERSITY of thought??

Oh noez..... gawd forbid that!!! Can't have any of that free speech around, free speech is alt-reich fascism!!! LOL

I personally don't care why youve been banned and I certainly haven't contributed to previous bannings. But if Literotica has a policy which leads to it, in order to deter behavior, and people just create new alts to get around it, then their policy is broken and needs to be addressed.

Your behavior is less worrisome on this site than people who do far worse. If you're banned, then you should not have an opportunity to sidestep

 

[DimmuBurger]

I personally don't care why youve been banned and I certainly haven't contributed to previous bannings.

Of course not, you're proudly with the pro ban/cancel/censorship party.

But if Literotica has a policy which leads to it, in order to deter behavior, and people just create new alts to get around it, then their policy is broken and needs to be addressed.

It's not the policy.... which I never violated.

Their strategy for censorship and silencing opinions they don't like is broken. Addressing it has been the problem of anti-free speech folks forever and the digital era made silencing opinions you don't like even harder.

Your behavior is less worrisome on this site than people who do far worse.

Sure.

If you're banned, then you should not have an opportunity to sidestep

Yes, we all know how pro-censorship you and the other hammer and sickle comrades are.

 

[Rotadom]

Dumb people with OCD and sociopathic issues tend to break rules and get banned. Being un-woke and a non-commie has nothing to do with it.

 

[butters]

oh, the rabid botany boy returns. taking a leaf out of lindell's playbook, huh.

 

[ll74]

Of course not, you're proudly with the pro ban/cancel/censorship party.



It's not the policy.... which I never violated.

Their strategy for censorship and silencing opinions they don't like is broken. Addressing it has been the problem of anti-free speech folks forever and the digital era made silencing opinions you don't like even harder.



Sure.



Yes, we all know how pro-censorship you and the other hammer and sickle comrades are.

Yes, you were banned by the forum and you simply sidestepped their ban by creating a new username. So their system is broken. But I repeat myself.

 

[butters]

I didn't do anything in this thread that violated the rules. Nowhere in the rules does it say that you can't promote or advocate violence.

The only rule I ever violated was not being woke and leftist enough for managements liking.

5. Do not threaten other people. Do not post images or words directly or indirectly implying threats of physical harm.

semantics

 

[pecksniff]

white male loathing leftist

You are an idiot.

 

[DimmuBurger]

5. Do not threaten other people. Do not post images or words directly or indirectly implying threats of physical harm.

semantics

I never threatened anyone. That would actually be against the rules.

Advocating violence as a matter of policy or a wish of misfortune is not a threat of physical harm directly nor indirectly.

It's not semantics, the word "threat" has a specific meaning that doesn't cover anything I've posted.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

It's not semantics, words mean things, lean English.

Poor lil Dumb-Dumb.

 

[DimmuBurger]

You are an idiot.

Why?

Because I'm not a white male loathing lefty like your comrade in the gif???
https://i.makeagif.com/media/1-12-2018/YLsxvr.gif

WAHHH!!!! Cry some more about white pwivwige!!

 

[butters]

I never threatened anyone.

Advocating violence as a matter of policy ( we should secure our borders with leathal force against anyone who doesn't come in properly) or a wish of misfortune ( I hope you get what's coming to you!) is not a threat of physical harm.

It's not semantics, words mean things, lean English.

in school, they taught us English

'leathal force' and 'lean English' were not considered actual, proper terms. bless your heart.

as for your bullshit, as i said... semantics. and some of us have longer memories that recall your advocating personal violence against another lit poster whose lifestyle you disagreed with.

 

[DimmuBurger]

Poor lil Dumb-Dumb.

Poor luk, just making shit up again because Butters said something dumb and neither of you idiots can defend it.

 

[butters]

poor little illiterate dimburger. ignore button's just the thing, and so quick and easy to use now with the upgrades!

 

[DimmuBurger]

in school, they taught us English

Obviously not, you don't seem to understand the word "threat" means.

'leathal force' and 'lean English' were not considered actual, proper terms. bless your heart.

Go for the typos because you can't argue any substance, bless YOUR heart granny.

as for your bullshit, as i said... semantics. and some of us have longer memories that recall your advocating personal violence against another lit poster whose lifestyle you disagreed with.

It's not semantics because you want to ignore the meaning of the word "threat". No matter how many times you try.

And I still hope people who abuse their partners and loved ones get the most brutal dish Karma can possibly serve them.