Durham Investigating The Clinton Campaign

[Rightguide]

Yes, I know the filings are public, but no, defense filings haven't been discussed in the media.

Durham's filings have been amplified before theyve been released or simultaneously. Durham's making sure of that.

That's bullshit, they are regularly discussed on FOX in conjunction with Durham filings. Your media however has been avoiding the subject because Durham has refuted their lies.

 

[ll74]

That's bullshit, they are regularly discussed on FOX in conjunction with Durham filings. Your media however has been avoiding the subject because Durham has refuted their lies.

Of course they are.

I don't have a "media". I have multiple feeds from Twitter I follow.....even the ones I hate.

 

[Rightguide]

Of course they are.

I don't have a "media". I have multiple feeds from Twitter I follow.....even the ones I hate.

Figures, The place where people go to get their censored news.

 

[Rotadom]

Figures, The place where people go to get their censored news.

The news isn't censored by Twitter. Twitter bans dummies who are mentally incapable of following the rules. There's a yuge difference.

 

[ll74]

Figures, The place where people go to get their censored news.

Of course you think that.....yet the exact same shit you post about here is typically posted there first.

But yah .......all that censorship and stuff.

 

[Rightguide]

Of course you think that.....yet the exact same shit you post about here is typically posted there first.

But yah .......all that censorship and stuff.

Only in some cases, but for the most part Twitter is a censored platform that caters to the woke and weak left. Trump and conservatives are banned but the terrorist Mullahs' of Iran and the CCP are allowed, as are hordes of racists like the NY subway shooter.

 

[ll74]

Only in some cases, but for the most part Twitter is a censored platform that caters to the woke and weak left. Trump and conservatives are banned but the terrorist Mullahs' of Iran and the CCP are allowed, as are hordes of racists like the NY subway shooter.

Yes, youve demonstrated that you don't like the platform. I truly don't care

 

[Rightguide]

Yes, youve demonstrated that you don't like the platform. I truly don't care

See how you deflect from the issue? So, you don't care if you get censored news, right? It's all about the messenger bringing the truth.

 

[ll74]

See how you deflect from the issue? So, you don't care if you get censored news, right? It's all about the messenger.

Again, I see the same shit you post here, mostly before you post iit.

So no..I don't care that I get information from multiple political angles regularly.

It's the easiest place to collate multiple political perspectives. Whether you don't like it is your issue...not mine.

 

[Rightguide]

Again, I see the same shit you post here, mostly before you post iit.

So no..I don't care that I get information from multiple political angles regularly.

It's the easiest place to collate multiple political perspectives. Whether you don't like it is your issue...not mine.

No, it's the easiest place to go to get the news Big Tech wants you to get. It's the new American form of the old Soviet-style Tass or Pravda. You're free to enjoy it, so have at it, but don't come back and try and tell me that actual facts and news isn't happening because you don't see it. Ignorance is a completely different existence than mine.

 

[ll74]

No, it's the easiest place to go to get the news Big Tech wants you to get. It's the new American form of the old Soviet-style Tass or Pravda. You're free to enjoy it, so have at it, but don't come back and try and tell me that actual facts and news isn't happening because you don't see it. Ignorance is a completely different existence than mine.

I get that you believe that, but it's just your belief.

The defense filings aren't being reported on. If you want to believe otherwise, that's your perogatvie.

 

[Rightguide]

I get that you believe that, but it's just your belief.

The defense filings aren't being reported on. If you want to believe otherwise, that's your perogatvie.

Certainly not by your media who propagated the lies that Durham is exposing as false.

 

[Rightguide]

CIA has known Trump-Russia collusion data not ‘technically plausible’ since 2017, Durham says​

by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter |
April 18, 2022 09:36 AM

An agency believed to be the CIA concluded the data underpinning certain Trump-Russia collusion allegations was not “technically plausible” by early 2017, casting further doubt on claims pushed by the Clinton campaign before the 2016 election.

Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann was indicted last September for allegedly concealing his clients — Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and “Tech Executive-1,” known to be former Neustar executive Rodney Joffe — from FBI general counsel James Baker in September 2016 when he pushed since-debunked claims of a secret back channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank.

The September 2021 indictment alleged Sussmann lied when he said he was not providing the domain name system data allegations to the FBI on behalf of any client when he was, in fact, doing so on behalf of Joffe and the Clinton campaign.

Durham is also scrutinizing claims Sussmann made to the CIA in February 2017 about Russian phones, called YotaPhones, which the Democratic cybersecurity lawyer had claimed linked former President Donald Trump to these phones near the White House.

Durham revealed Friday that while the FBI “did not reach an ultimate conclusion regarding the data’s accuracy or whether it might have been in whole or in part genuine, spoofed, altered, or fabricated” as it was being pushed to government agencies, the CIA “concluded in early 2017 that the Russian Bank-1 data and Russian Phone Provider-1 data” — the Alfa Bank and YotaPhone information — was not “technically plausible,” did not “withstand technical scrutiny,” was “user created and not machine/tool generated," “contained gaps,” and “conflicted with [itself].” The special counsel said his office “has not reached a definitive conclusion in this regard.”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-technically-plausible-since-2017-durham-says

 

[ll74]

Certainly not by your media who propagated the lies that Durham is exposing as false.

Durham continues to try and make a case against Sussman to prove he lied. Nothing he has filed has done anything else and, I'd argue, hasnt even done much for his case.

Unless something drastically changes, Durham has maybe one more indictment that will also go nowhere.

As stated earlier ..I don't have a "media"....I read the filings and analysis- and even read yours, which is a regurgitation/copypasta of the analysis from the sites you read.

 

[phrodeau]

An agency believed to be the CIA

Fake news.

has not reached a definitive conclusion

Witch hunt.

 

[Rightguide]

Durham issues trial subpoenas to Clinton campaign and DNC​

by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter |
| April 23, 2022 03:28 PM

Special counsel John Durham issued trial subpoenas for members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Democratic National Committee as he pushed his theory of a “joint venture” in the case against Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, who represented the Clinton campaign, and Rodney Joffe.

"
“The goal of the joint venture could not have been more clear: it was to gather and disseminate derogatory non-public information regarding the internet activities of a political candidate and his associates,” he wrote.

“And that venture was far from collateral to the charged crime. Indeed, the above-described joint venture was the very project that led Tech Executive-1 to rely upon the defendant’s services; the very project that gave rise to the Russian Bank-1 allegations; the very project that prompted agents of the Clinton Campaign to meet with Tech Executive-1; and the very project that caused the defendant to meet with the FBI General Counsel and lie to him about the clients who were behind all of this work," Durham said."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...s-trial-subpoenas-to-clinton-campaign-and-dnc

 

[Rightguide]

​

Docs: Spygate Researchers Did Work For Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller​

BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND
APRIL 22, 2022

The U.S. Department of Defense and private individuals pumping the Alfa Bank hoax also assisted former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Donald Trump for supposed collusion with Russia, newly discovered documents suggest.

The Georgia Tech researchers embroiled in the Alfa Bank hoax prepared white papers for the U.S. Department of Defense about the Democratic National Committee hack and created a “Mueller List” on the Russian intelligence agency hackers, the newly obtained documents indicate. The white papers were prepared for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), a section of the U.S. Department of Defense.


A recent dump of documents from Georgia Tech reveals that explosive detail and several other facts connected to the continuing special counsel investigation into Spygate. Here’s a rundown.

White Papers for the U.S. Department of Defense​

Last month, The Federalist first reported that Special Counsel John Durham’s team asked lead Georgia Tech researcher Manos Antonakakis: “‘Do you believe that DARPA should be instructing you to investigate the origins of a hacker (Guccifer_2.0) that hacked a political entity (DNC)?’” Antonakakis responded that that was a question for the DARPA director, an implied acknowledgment that yes, DARPA had asked him to investigate the hack.

In response, DARPA’s chief of communications denied any involvement “in efforts to attribute the DNC hack.” “Dr. Antonakakis worked on DARPA’s Enhanced Attribution program, which did not involve analysis of the DNC hack,” DARPA spokesman Jared Adams told the Washington Examiner. Adams further told the Washington Examiner that “DARPA was not involved in efforts to attribute the Guccifer 2.0 persona, nor any involvement in efforts to attribute the origin of leaked emails provided to Wikileaks.”

More here: https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/2...rk-for-former-special-counsel-robert-mueller/

It's all coming together.

 

[HisArpy]

Yes, I know the filings are public, but no, defense filings haven't been discussed in the media.

Durham's filings have been amplified before theyve been released or simultaneously. Durham's making sure of that.

dudly, the defense filing HAVE BEEN discussed in the media. Just because you don't know that doesn't mean it hasn't been happening.

It's like you're ignorant or something ON PURPOSE.

 

[HisArpy]

Figures, The place where people go to get their censored FAKE news.

Fixed it for you.

 

[HisArpy]

​

Docs: Spygate Researchers Did Work For Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller​

BY: MARGOT CLEVELAND
APRIL 22, 2022

The U.S. Department of Defense and private individuals pumping the Alfa Bank hoax also assisted former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Donald Trump for supposed collusion with Russia, newly discovered documents suggest.

The Georgia Tech researchers embroiled in the Alfa Bank hoax prepared white papers for the U.S. Department of Defense about the Democratic National Committee hack and created a “Mueller List” on the Russian intelligence agency hackers, the newly obtained documents indicate. The white papers were prepared for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), a section of the U.S. Department of Defense.


A recent dump of documents from Georgia Tech reveals that explosive detail and several other facts connected to the continuing special counsel investigation into Spygate. Here’s a rundown.

White Papers for the U.S. Department of Defense​

Last month, The Federalist first reported that Special Counsel John Durham’s team asked lead Georgia Tech researcher Manos Antonakakis: “‘Do you believe that DARPA should be instructing you to investigate the origins of a hacker (Guccifer_2.0) that hacked a political entity (DNC)?’” Antonakakis responded that that was a question for the DARPA director, an implied acknowledgment that yes, DARPA had asked him to investigate the hack.

In response, DARPA’s chief of communications denied any involvement “in efforts to attribute the DNC hack.” “Dr. Antonakakis worked on DARPA’s Enhanced Attribution program, which did not involve analysis of the DNC hack,” DARPA spokesman Jared Adams told the Washington Examiner. Adams further told the Washington Examiner that “DARPA was not involved in efforts to attribute the Guccifer 2.0 persona, nor any involvement in efforts to attribute the origin of leaked emails provided to Wikileaks.”

More here: https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/2...rk-for-former-special-counsel-robert-mueller/

It's all coming together.

I don't know. Unless Durham has more than "an inference" in a response to an improper question, this isn't going anywhere.

 

[HisArpy]

Durham issues trial subpoenas to Clinton campaign and DNC​

by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter |
| April 23, 2022 03:28 PM

Special counsel John Durham issued trial subpoenas for members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and the Democratic National Committee as he pushed his theory of a “joint venture” in the case against Democratic cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann, who represented the Clinton campaign, and Rodney Joffe.

"
“The goal of the joint venture could not have been more clear: it was to gather and disseminate derogatory non-public information regarding the internet activities of a political candidate and his associates,” he wrote.

“And that venture was far from collateral to the charged crime. Indeed, the above-described joint venture was the very project that led Tech Executive-1 to rely upon the defendant’s services; the very project that gave rise to the Russian Bank-1 allegations; the very project that prompted agents of the Clinton Campaign to meet with Tech Executive-1; and the very project that caused the defendant to meet with the FBI General Counsel and lie to him about the clients who were behind all of this work," Durham said."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...s-trial-subpoenas-to-clinton-campaign-and-dnc

Ouch.

Potential espionage AND "fraud against the US" charges in that.

 

[Rightguide]

Ouch.

Potential espionage AND "fraud against the US" charges in that.

I don't know. Unless Durham has more than "an inference" in a response to an improper question, this isn't going anywhere.

I don't know where this is going but it appears to be the beginnings of a conspiracy case. They did try to disrupt and undermine the presidency which could be an element of a conspiracy to defraud The United States prosecution as explained here:

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-923-18-usc-371-conspiracy-defraud-us

 

[HisArpy]

I don't know where this is going but it appears to be the beginnings of a conspiracy case. They did try to disrupt and undermine the presidency which could be an element of a conspiracy to defraud The United States prosecution as explained here:

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-923-18-usc-371-conspiracy-defraud-us

I'm pretty sure that Durham is looking at Hillary and her campaign, and her people/connections in regards to a conspiracy to defraud the us theory. I'm just not sure that he'll get there with the "inferred response" to his question since that question wouldn't be allowed in court under any circumstances and re-wording it to get it past an objection would render it useless at best.

 

[Rightguide]

I'm pretty sure that Durham is looking at Hillary and her campaign, and her people/connections in regards to a conspiracy to defraud the us theory. I'm just not sure that he'll get there with the "inferred response" to his question since that question wouldn't be allowed in court under any circumstances and re-wording it to get it past an objection would render it useless at best.

Another interesting aspect of it all is the alleged "statute of limitations" having run. In the case of conspiracy, as I pointed out a while back and which you probably already know, the limitation runs from the last overt act of the conspiracy, and depending on where that occurs the prosecution could be viable for some time.

I think he should pursue a case against those 51 Intel officials who attempted to defraud the United States as well.

 

[Rightguide]

Ratcliffe predicts still-classified documents will blow Durham inquiry wide open​

by Daniel Chaitin, Deputy News Editor |
| April 24, 2022 09:14 AM
| Updated Apr 24, 2022, 12:03 PM

A great deal more Russiagate intelligence remains shrouded from public view and will stun the nation, according to former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe.

The Trump-era spy chief expounded upon his expectation that there will be many more indictments in special counsel John Durham's criminal inquiry into the origins and conduct of the Russia investigation.

"I expect there to be a lot more indictments to be forthcoming from John Durham besides the ones that have trickled out so far. And that's based upon documents, some of which — many of which are not yet declassified," Ratcliffe said during a recent episode of the Charlie Kirk Show.

Ratcliffe, a former Republican congressman from Texas who oversaw the nation's 17 intelligence agencies in the latter part of the Trump administration, announced in October 2020 that he had handed over nearly 1,000 pages of materials to the Justice Department to assist Durham, who is revealing more secrets as he takes people to court.

"The coordinated effort here that took place in 2016 was wide and broad. I think it involved folks in the Clinton campaign, in the Democratic national party, elected officials, media officials, folks that coordinated — intelligence community officials, and on down the line," Ratcliffe said. "I'm not saying that every single one of those folks have criminal liability or exposure. I'm just saying this was a very coordinated effort and the more and more the public finds out about the things that I've seen that remain classified, they'll be more and more appalled by those efforts in 2016."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-documents-will-blow-durham-inquiry-wide-open

Being the former DNI he should know.