If you're an American boomer, chances are all the American presidents from during your lifetime were war criminals

Guiding your country through the "more gray areas than white or black" international morass isn't a cake walk.
 
sigh always irritated me.

She leads with the "I'm a doctor or whatever, so I tend to write based on facts and logic", the implicit message being "I'm more intelligent and cultured than most of you."
She might be brilliant in her job, but her political posts are far more mediocre than 90% of our posters.
anyone with more than a pinch of actual intellect annoys you; your own insecurity due to a palpable sense of inferiority is what drives your emotional reactions to posters such as sigh.
 
anyone with more than a pinch of actual intellect annoys you; your own insecurity due to a palpable sense of inferiority is what drives your emotional reactions to posters such as sigh.

and I presume, to posters such as yourself too....
 
I won't engage with Rightiists/Leftists like icanQ1 or 1ll74 etc etc because my blood will go up.
They give a lot less about Ukrainians killed, than about scoring political points or God forbid their shares and bonds and investments go down.
The problem with you is you don't know who or what you want to bash.

Second: I'm not Q

Take your frustrations out on the real culprit and that's PUTIN!!!

We're a capitalist style economy and if Ukraine needs weapons to fight the Russian scourge then our system benefits Ukraine the best. Stop acting like a schizophrenic manic depressive. War sucks.
 
The problem with you is you don't know who or what you want to bash.

Second: I'm not Q

Take your frustrations out on the real culprit and that's PUTIN!!!

We're a capitalist style economy and if Ukraine needs weapons to fight the Russian scourge then our system benefits Ukraine the best. Stop acting like a schizophrenic manic depressive. War sucks.

Your leaders need to be tried by the International tribunal for War Crimes, straight after Putin.
 
We're a capitalist style economy and if Ukraine needs weapons to fight the Russian scourge then our system benefits Ukraine the best. Stop acting like a schizophrenic manic depressive. War sucks.
😙 Why do I suspect that Q was on a Tony Robbins teaching tour in the Middle East
the year before the Towers were hit?
 
Truman was not a war criminal. The decision to drop the atomic bombs was sound. By that point Japanese civilians of both sexes were drilling as a militia for a last-ditch defense of the Home Islands and, since there were not enough rifles to go around, they were drilling with bamboo spears. An Allied ground invasion would have flooded the gutters of every town in Japan with Japanese blood. The body count from the atomic bombing was trivial by comparison, gave the Japanese an honorable excuse to surrender, and brought a neat end to the whole conflict. And I've never heard of the U.S. being accused of any war crimes in Korea.

I've never heard Eisenhower called a war criminal. He was politically responsible for the Vietnam War in that he refused to allow the all-Vietnam elections provided for by the Geneva Accords, which Ho Chi Min's party certainly would have won; but no Americans committed any war crimes there under his watch.

Kennedy and Johnson are more complicated judgments.
They are an island nation. We could have blockaded them with ease. We chose to nuke em to prove that we could.
 
whether this president or that was a war criminal......it is a moot point......the fact is that on any given day any president of either the left wing or the right.....is tasked with making a call about an issue that is both a moral and ethical dilemma......he is prone to make the call based on a myriad of data, the advice of his staff, and his own worldview. in many cases, however, there is no good answer and a choice is made that may well involve the deaths of some or many. the sad reality is, the world is a far worse place than most can imagine or even than hollywood has portrayed and tough decisions have to be made. many could make a good case of many presidential decisions to be criminal whether involving war or other things but the defense could also make the case that, all considered, they made the best choice.
 
Your leaders need to be tried by the International tribunal for War Crimes, straight after Putin.
They'd be too busy with Russia, China, N Korea, Iran, Syria, Saudis, most of Africa and a crap load of others before they got to the US
 
Truman -- Eisenhower -- Kennedy and Johnson
I think that most of us (and not just me a non-American) don't know as much about them, as we do about the Bush-Bush-Clinton-Obama-Trump-Biden five horses of sociopathic doom.
But the ones you mentioned ARE just as, if not more relevant due to their involvement in similar major wars.
I'd be keen on hearing more.
Just being a wartime president doesn't make you a war criminal.
 
hey you fat superior fuck

your military-industrial complex made BILLIONS out of each war you were involved in.
and is continuing to make your fat ass rich out of the Ukraine carnage.

Explain that.
So what? We've never gone to war just to enrich the MIC.
 
Your leaders need to be tried by the International tribunal for War Crimes, straight after Putin.
Under your basically unstated standard, this would apply to every ruler in every nations since the dawn of civilization.
 
Under your basically unstated standard, this would apply to every ruler in every nations since the dawn of civilization.

I have to give it to you. instead of butting heads, you cleverly shifted the debate, and through that vantage point its harder to demonize you guys.

I'm just disgusted that while people are being killed and raped, some corporations like the arms manufacturers are making shitloads of money.
But my mom said "that happened in all wars, there was always a new wealthy class that emerged post-war."
 
Wall Street bonds shares valuations or whatever of the arms manufacturing businesses have been hitting the roof since the war began

wtf. The system is so psychopathic
 
Interestingly, the same political analysts
--gosh, they mushroomed since the war analysts, historians, retired generals--
that were calling the US "a war economy"
were also having a go at Sweden,

claiming that they based their economy and wealth on handling the money of international oligarchs, war criminals and and crooks.
 
I have to give it to you. instead of butting heads, you cleverly shifted the debate, and through that vantage point its harder to demonize you guys.

I'm just disgusted that while people are being killed and raped, some corporations like the arms manufacturers are making shitloads of money.
But my mom said "that happened in all wars, there was always a new wealthy class that emerged post-war."
What I did was look at your rant through the lens of reality. What I saw was that you focused on the (to you) undesireable color of one tiny pixel and decided that the entire picture was horrible and thusly denounced the artists as having no technique or talent and therefore should be eliminated from polite society.

It doesn't work that way. As your mom tried to tell you.
 
Back
Top