Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
anyone with more than a pinch of actual intellect annoys you; your own insecurity due to a palpable sense of inferiority is what drives your emotional reactions to posters such as sigh.sigh always irritated me.
She leads with the "I'm a doctor or whatever, so I tend to write based on facts and logic", the implicit message being "I'm more intelligent and cultured than most of you."
She might be brilliant in her job, but her political posts are far more mediocre than 90% of our posters.
anyone with more than a pinch of actual intellect annoys you; your own insecurity due to a palpable sense of inferiority is what drives your emotional reactions to posters such as sigh.
The Greatest Generation collectively rolls in their graves over boomers' dipshitery.But then he can't blame us for supporting it.
sigh doesn't lie about her medical career, doctor hashtagand I presume, to posters such as yourself too....
The problem with you is you don't know who or what you want to bash.I won't engage with Rightiists/Leftists like icanQ1 or 1ll74 etc etc because my blood will go up.
They give a lot less about Ukrainians killed, than about scoring political points or God forbid their shares and bonds and investments go down.
The problem with you is you don't know who or what you want to bash.
Second: I'm not Q
Take your frustrations out on the real culprit and that's PUTIN!!!
We're a capitalist style economy and if Ukraine needs weapons to fight the Russian scourge then our system benefits Ukraine the best. Stop acting like a schizophrenic manic depressive. War sucks.
We're a capitalist style economy and if Ukraine needs weapons to fight the Russian scourge then our system benefits Ukraine the best. Stop acting like a schizophrenic manic depressive. War sucks.
They are an island nation. We could have blockaded them with ease. We chose to nuke em to prove that we could.Truman was not a war criminal. The decision to drop the atomic bombs was sound. By that point Japanese civilians of both sexes were drilling as a militia for a last-ditch defense of the Home Islands and, since there were not enough rifles to go around, they were drilling with bamboo spears. An Allied ground invasion would have flooded the gutters of every town in Japan with Japanese blood. The body count from the atomic bombing was trivial by comparison, gave the Japanese an honorable excuse to surrender, and brought a neat end to the whole conflict. And I've never heard of the U.S. being accused of any war crimes in Korea.
I've never heard Eisenhower called a war criminal. He was politically responsible for the Vietnam War in that he refused to allow the all-Vietnam elections provided for by the Geneva Accords, which Ho Chi Min's party certainly would have won; but no Americans committed any war crimes there under his watch.
Kennedy and Johnson are more complicated judgments.
whether this president or that was a war criminal......it is a moot point......the fact is that on any given day any president of either the left wing or the right.....is tasked with making a call about an issue that is both a moral and ethical dilemma......he is prone to make the call based on a myriad of data, the advice of his staff, and his own worldview. in many cases, however, there is no good answer and a choice is made that may well involve the deaths of some or many. the sad reality is, the world is a far worse place than most can imagine or even than hollywood has portrayed and tough decisions have to be made. many could make a good case of many presidential decisions to be criminal whether involving war or other things but the defense could also make the case that, all considered, they made the best choice.discuss
They'd be too busy with Russia, China, N Korea, Iran, Syria, Saudis, most of Africa and a crap load of others before they got to the USYour leaders need to be tried by the International tribunal for War Crimes, straight after Putin.
Just being a wartime president doesn't make you a war criminal.Truman -- Eisenhower -- Kennedy and Johnson
I think that most of us (and not just me a non-American) don't know as much about them, as we do about the Bush-Bush-Clinton-Obama-Trump-Biden five horses of sociopathic doom.
But the ones you mentioned ARE just as, if not more relevant due to their involvement in similar major wars.
I'd be keen on hearing more.
So what? We've never gone to war just to enrich the MIC.hey you fat superior fuck
your military-industrial complex made BILLIONS out of each war you were involved in.
and is continuing to make your fat ass rich out of the Ukraine carnage.
Explain that.
Every nation was built on some other's bones.nevermind that your nation was founded on the genocide of Native Americans,
Under your basically unstated standard, this would apply to every ruler in every nations since the dawn of civilization.Your leaders need to be tried by the International tribunal for War Crimes, straight after Putin.
Under your basically unstated standard, this would apply to every ruler in every nations since the dawn of civilization.
What I did was look at your rant through the lens of reality. What I saw was that you focused on the (to you) undesireable color of one tiny pixel and decided that the entire picture was horrible and thusly denounced the artists as having no technique or talent and therefore should be eliminated from polite society.I have to give it to you. instead of butting heads, you cleverly shifted the debate, and through that vantage point its harder to demonize you guys.
I'm just disgusted that while people are being killed and raped, some corporations like the arms manufacturers are making shitloads of money.
But my mom said "that happened in all wars, there was always a new wealthy class that emerged post-war."