Former President Violated Multiple Laws - Says Jan 6 Committee

[pecksniff]

And for sure I took a victory lap last year over Trump’s second acquittal.

That ain't something of which you should feel proud.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

I've never said Trump will get jail time, but nice deflection

Most of your victory laps happen prematurely. You're lucky if you get them right, but there's never enough information to do so. If you feel prophetic, then maybe you should play the lottery. Most of the time you're posting what you want to happen rather than providing intelligent analysis of what will happen.

I don‘t think I’ve ever called you out for saying Trump’s going to jail. There are tons of posts on this board accusing Trump of criminal acts and predicting imminent prosecution and conviction. I don’t keep track of who posts this nonsense, but they have been posting this stuff for years.

Yes, I take victory laps “prematurely” in much the same way football teams celebrate on the sidelines and dunk Gatorade on their head coach when the score is 53 to 0 with 20 seconds left in the game.

 

[ll74]

I don‘t think I’ve ever called you out for saying Trump’s going to jail. There are tons of posts on this board accusing Trump of criminal acts and predicting imminent prosecution and conviction. I don’t keep track of who posts this nonsense, but they have been posting this stuff for years.

Yes, I take victory laps “prematurely” in much the same way football teams celebrate on the sidelines and dunk Gatorade on their head coach when the score is 53 to 0 with 20 seconds left in the game.

Yes, you complain about "those posts" all the time. You are awesome...good job

Good luck on your predictions. I just want better policy that benefits good people.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

That ain't something of which you should feel proud.

I understand that you’re not happy with the outcome of that political process. You’re probably not happy with the state of the legal processes that have come and gone over all these years either.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Yes, you complain about "those posts" all the time. You are awesome...good job

Good luck on your predictions. I just want better policy that benefits good people.

No complaints. Lots of ridicule though.

 

[ll74]

No complaints. Lots of ridicule though.

Right....making threads to ridicule....that's something to aspire to. It's such a unique angle.

 

[pecksniff]

I understand that you’re not happy with the outcome of that political process. You’re probably not happy with the state of the legal processes that have come and gone over all these years either.

The disgusting thing is that you're happy with all of that, and with Trump. We are way past the point of reasonable disagreement here -- you're not only wrong, you're evil.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

The disgusting thing is that you're happy with all of that, and with Trump. We are way past the point of reasonable disagreement here -- you're not only wrong, you're evil.

Yes, due process and the rule of law make me happy. Its a shame that so many tax dollars have been wasted on a political vendetta but at least no one can complain that investigations and prosecutorial efforts were inadequate. Sorry you’re unhappy that no criminal charges against the former president have come from all this partisanship over all these years.

 

[HisArpy]

Yes, the appeals court overturned her ruling. You don't feel she's qualified. Lobby your Senator.

One specific appeal ruling doesn't change my perspective nor does it negate any other ruling she's had...sorry.

dudly, what the fuck do you think people are already doing?

Then there's the fact that despite all of what we've talked about in regards to her putting her ideology first rather than the law she swore an oath to uphold and follow, you still insist that she's the best thing since sliced bread.

I guess being a Democrat nominee is THE most important part of her qualifications to you and nothing else matters except that. Even at the cost of everything the US holds dear.

 

[HisArpy]

So two degrees from Harvard and more judicial experience than Chief Justice Roberts had when he was nominated don't count, huh?

Which has zero to do with why she was the nominee. REMEMBER, Brandon said he was nominating "a black woman."

 

[HisArpy]

If you say so.

Boy, for someone who tosses around the fingerpointing "you're a racist" schtick as much as you do, you sure spent a lot of time typing a single word over and over and over again.

And everyone else is the "racist" and not you...

 

[HisArpy]

Go fuck yourself.

Son, if you're going to get all heated up inside and stick your bigoted racist hateful puny assed commentary into these types of conversations, you need to learn how to make a point and have it stick instead of ineffectually waving your floppy miniscule manhood around in public where everyone can see it.

Now...


GO FUCK YOURSELF

 

[LukSkyFokker]

RAPEY is a typical terrible lawyer. Says a bunch of dumb shit and then spends all morning defending his dumb shit.

 

[YDB95]

Which has zero to do with why she was the nominee. REMEMBER, Brandon said he was nominating "a black woman."

He did not say "with disregard for whether she has any qualifications," and it was patently obvious he did not mean that. Anyone could see he meant a QUALIFIED Black woman, and Jackson is that.

 

[ll74]

Which has zero to do with why she was the nominee. REMEMBER, Brandon said he was nominating "a black woman."

Of course it has to do with her being the nominee. That's just dumb.

Do you understand how qualifications even work?

 

[pecksniff]

Yes, due process and the rule of law make me happy. Its a shame that so many tax dollars have been wasted on a political vendetta but at least no one can complain that investigations and prosecutorial efforts were inadequate. Sorry you’re unhappy that no criminal charges against the former president have come from all this partisanship over all these years.

No. That's not how this is at all. You know perfectly well -- the whole world knows -- that Trump was guilty of everything charged in his impeachment, and that he was only acquitted because of the partisan loyalty of Pub senators. Taking a victory lap over that makes you evil.

 

[pecksniff]

Which has zero to do with why she was the nominee. REMEMBER, Brandon said he was nominating "a black woman."

And Reagan said he would nominate a woman. That does not mean O'Connor's qualifications had zero to do with why she was the nominee.

And when are you all going to drop that stupid "Brandon" shit?!

 

[pecksniff]

No. That's not how this is at all. You know perfectly well -- the whole world knows -- that Trump was guilty of everything charged in his impeachment, and that he was only acquitted because of the partisan loyalty of Pub senators. Taking a victory lap over that makes you evil.

And that applies to both impeachments.

 

[YDB95]

And Reagan said he would nominate a woman. That does not mean O'Connor's qualifications had zero to do with why she was the nominee.

And when are you all going to drop that stupid "Brandon" shit?!

When it stops getting a rise out of us. Ignoring bullies doesn't really make them go away the way people used to say, but it's still probably the best course of action.

 

[ll74]

Seriously Peck...out of everybody on these boards, you post way too fucking much. Step away and get some air.

 

[HisArpy]

Of course it has to do with her being the nominee. That's just dumb.

Do you understand how qualifications even work?

Do you understand what "qualification" means?

Hint: It doesn't mean "warm body with a specific melanin count and gender."


And, speaking of gender; what the hell happened to all those other "qualified candidates" who might identify as "female" and who have an equal or better resume? Did they get any consideration at all or is the "gender fluid" mantra just bullshit like we've been telling you it is?

 

[HisArpy]

And Reagan said he would nominate a woman. That does not mean O'Connor's qualifications had zero to do with why she was the nominee.

And when are you all going to drop that stupid "Brandon" shit?!

So, if someone says they're going to jump off a bridge, you can too AND go one better by doing it while swan diving in a mesh thong?


What happened to "the adults are back in the room"?

 

[ll74]

Do you understand what "qualification" means?

Hint: It doesn't mean "warm body with a specific melanin count and gender."


And, speaking of gender; what the hell happened to all those other "qualified candidates" who might identify as "female" and who have an equal or better resume? Did they get any consideration at all or is the "gender fluid" mantra just bullshit like we've been telling you it is?

Qualifications are whatever the person doing the hiring says they are.... especially when a President nominates a candidate to a position.

Then the Senate can vote for or against that candidate based on her qualifications.

Sorry that you hate the additional qualifications that the President has added

If you have qualifications that someone doesn't meet, then they wouldn't have a better resume than those that have that qualification. In fact, it would be the opposite.

Maybe file an FOIA and see which candidates made the list and why