When a Trumper Missuses "Authoritarian/Totalitarian" - Show it this Thread

Rotadom

Satan's Plaything
Joined
Oct 14, 2017
Posts
10,791

Oklahoma is advancing a bill that would criminalize school librarians over LGBTQ books


https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/03...ll-criminalize-school-librarians-lgbtq-books/

What is wrong with you people?

After the very end of a legislative session on Tuesday, the Oklahoma Senate Education Committee passed a bill to ban LGBTQ books (and books on LGBTQ-inclusive sex education). The bill now looks to advance towards the Senate floor. Authored by state Senator Rob Standridge (R-OK- District 15), Oklahoma SB 1142 would criminalize any school official or librarian that has any books that “make as their primary subject the study of sex, sexual preferences, sexual activity, sexual perversion, sex-based classifications, sexual identity, or gender identity or books that are of a sexual nature.”

SB 1142 also adds the stipulation that if any person could sue a school stating they have a book that violates the policy, the school librarian or official will be forced to remove the book within a 30-day period. If the school official or librarian does not remove the book, the school shall be fined a minimum of $10,000 a day, and that school official or librarian will be barred from working in any school for a period of two years.

This bill by Standridge is in conjunction with his other bill, SB 1470, that seeks to penalize teachers for a minimum of $10,000 if they teach something that goes against a student’s religious belief. This bill also works in conjunction with SB 1654, authored by state Senator Shane Jett (R-OK- District 17),which seeks to ban LGBTQ books, as well as books about “recreational sexualization”, i.e. books that discuss “non-procreative sex”. Standridge’s SB1470 is different from the other two bills in the fact this bill would bar teachers from teaching in the state of Oklahoma for five years, beyond the two years in SB 1142.

SB 1470 has not been brought up for a vote, but SB 1142 passed on March 1 on an 8-4 vote along party lines through Republican majority. Only one Republican voted against the bill.

These bills are part of a coordinated effort by Republicans known as the “No Promo Homo” laws. Though such laws have been most notably in the news due to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill, The Hill reported that 15 other similar bills are currently floating through U.S. state legislatures. Oklahoma is just one of many Republican-led states that are currently targeting LGBTQ books and people as part of a plan that would lead to monumental harm for LGBTQ kids.
 
One does not often see the phrase "sexual perversion" in print any more.
 
Oklahoma doesn't want it's schools peddling LGBTQ materials to their kids.

What's wrong with American Democracy?? :D
This would be on more thing on the long, long list of reason states are stupid idea. Though it could be worse.
 
Always funny when Poor lil GED butchers the English language in a thread about education.
 
This is exactly why states are awesome.

It could be worse, it could be California.
An absolute power house of freedom and economics unrivaled pretty much anywhere? California's handful of problems come from too much freedom, not to little and simple economics forces us to move a snails pace because of you.
 
An absolute power house of freedom

LMFAO!!!! That must be why I can own and do so much more in literally every other state not NY, another authoritarian shit hole with their fuckin' vaccine gestapo.

and economics unrivaled pretty much anywhere?

Except Beijing LOL

California's handful of problems come from too much freedom, not to little

You are DELUSIONAL. You don't have any fuckin' freedom in that shit hole.

Feeding the homeless will literally get you SWAT'ed. Tuner car? Not in California, that's off road only because CARB and 'smog' stations say no fun for you!

1st, 2nd and 4th amendment are practically non-existent and constantly under attack.

Want to start so much as a lawn service?? A lemonade stand???

Nope, need an army of lawyers and 1.5 MILLION liquid just sitting around and 5 years to spare to even think about doing that in California.

Only the rich and well connected are allowed to start a business in that state....everyone else needs to get their welfare or 15/hr and stfu.... and it was regulated that way intentionally.

The elitism in California is the most rampant and overt of any state in the union except maybe NY. People like you as so busy licking (D) boots you don't even realize it.

Put your mask on!! Your governor, state/local pols, Hollywood/Silicon Valley elite all need a good laugh.

and simple economics forces us to move a snails pace because of you.

No, you could have a no ID needed UHC for any and all who show up with their hands out, paid for by 99.9% taxes on EVERYTHING in California including your fuckin' fillings. Heavy wealth taxes on anything you have left until private property is only for the rich well connected (D)'eez.

Nothing stopping you guys from showing us all how amazing and wonderful an open borders welfare utopia works.

If it would be super wonderful progress for the USA as a whole California should benefit immensely from all that authoritarian "progress" towards equity right??

DO IT!!!!! :D Show us all how it's done. The only reason you don't is because not even the most "progressive" of bleeding heart elitist equity warriors actually believes that stupid shit would do anything except collapse your increasingly fragile dumpster fire of a state.
 
Last edited:
The fact that you think those things shows just how little you understand about the system. Ignoring that as you point out, you'd just come here and mooch if we did it without you going long with UHC, you somehow forget we can't even set our own emission standards.
 
The fact that you think those things shows just how little you understand about the system.

Where am I wrong??

Ignoring that as you point out, you'd just come here and mooch if we did it without you going long with UHC,

NOOOOO!!!!! It wouldn't happen to the USA if it were an open borders welfare state, it wouldn't happen to California either.

An open borders welfare state would just be 100% wonderful progress!!!! :D Pure rainbow farts and unicorn dick juice!! No foreseeable downside or any consequences.

you somehow forget we can't even set our own emission standards.
You can and do, it's called getting a "smog check", if they can do it with cars they can do it with whatever else they want and there is no legal reason they can't.

You just won't do the radical green stuff because in reality, just like the open borders universal welfare state, it would fucking implode California.

You guys would need some kind of immigration policy to protect your system for it to have any chance of actually working and that is a big fucking problem for you and the comrades who claim borders and ID are WACIST!! Except for Ukraine of course, their borders are not racist and totally sacred.... because "progress" or something like that.
 
No its not called getting a smog check. ITs callsed setting standards and the feds have shut us down for trying in the past.

You're the only person who is really talking open borders anyhow.
 
No its not called getting a smog check. ITs callsed setting standards and the feds have shut us down for trying in the past.

You're the only person who is really talking open borders anyhow.
It's the usual false equivalency -- relaxing the insane measures Trump took is the same as an open-borders policy.
 
No its not called getting a smog check. ITs callsed setting standards

Smog checks are a state set standard.

and the feds have shut us down for trying in the past.

No rights are absolute and you can't be overstepping your authority though it's very clear you guys want to.

California really should leave and show dumbfuckistan how the equity utopia gets done!

You're the only person who is really talking open borders anyhow.
No.

I'm just far right enough to be honest about why the left condemns our borders existence, marches and engages in open borders activism and the active undermining of our immigration laws.
 
I'm just far right enough to be honest about why the left condemns our borders existence, marches and engages in open borders activism and the active undermining of our immigration laws.
Not for the sake of building a Dem voting majority, if that's what you mean.
 
It's the usual false equivalency -- relaxing the insane measures Trump took is the same as an open-borders policy.
Securing our borders and enforcing our immigration laws is his job, not insane measure.

That you consider having a border and immigration laws insane, shows just how insane you and the other open borders lunatics.
 
Not for the sake of building a Dem voting majority, if that's what you mean.
Doesn't matter what it's for, you're openly deride the existence of borders and immigration laws as evil and racist.... except for Ukraine of course.

You actively subvert the enforcement of our borders and laws.
 
Doesn't matter what it's for, you're openly deride the existence of borders and immigration laws as evil and racist.... except for Ukraine of course.
Will you please drop that preposterous false equivalency once and for all?
 
Back
Top