Why is Biden now less popular than Trump?

[Tigersman]

Trump was not unpopular with the vast majority,
and that shows up in the actual election results unless
you want to say that Biden was only slightly less unpopular
with that "vast majority" but still not popular enough to win the "vast" vote...

If Trump was not unpopular with the "vast majority" the explain why he lost the election. Oh I know, there were thousands of fraudulent votes.

 

[HisArpy]

If Trump was not unpopular with the "vast majority" the explain why he lost the election. Oh I know, there were thousands of fraudulent votes.

Because we don't elect President's based on popularity or majority of votes.

And please don't try to tell us that there wasn't a lot of bullshit going on during the election. The facts are known that at least one commissioner illegally changed the voting laws in their state which was pivotal in getting Brandon elected.

 

[pecksniff]

If Trump was not unpopular with the "vast majority" the explain why he lost the election. Oh I know, there were thousands of fraudulent votes.

Only a dozen or so fraudulent votes have been documented -- all cast for Trump.

 

[YDB95]

I am convinced, beyond a shadow of doubt, that reading comprehension
has never been within viewing distance of your eyes and that
you have no idea what near meant in context.

I am equally convinced you don't know what "context" means. Which would explain why you based your opinion entirely on the headline and may well have not even read the article.

 

[HisArpy]

Only a dozen or so fraudulent votes have been documented -- all cast for Trump.

Actually, not true.

For your information, Wisconsin's Supreme Court recently made a decision that their Elections Commissioner ILLEGALLY changed the voting laws. Changes which allowed a metric shit ton of otherwise ineligible votes to be counted as valid.

That's a lot of "fraudulent" votes and I'm fairly certain (without any supporting evidence other than the fact that there were enough of them to change the election results) that not all of them were cast in favor of Trump. Mostly because if they had been, he'd have been elected.

 

[phrodeau]

Actually, not true.

For your information, Wisconsin's Supreme Court recently made a decision that their Elections Commissioner ILLEGALLY changed the voting laws. Changes which allowed a metric shit ton of otherwise ineligible votes to be counted as valid.

That's a lot of "fraudulent" votes and I'm fairly certain (without any supporting evidence other than the fact that there were enough of them to change the election results) that not all of them were cast in favor of Trump. Mostly because if they had been, he'd have been elected.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission is six people, and three of them are Republicans.

 

[pecksniff]

Actually, not true.

For your information, Wisconsin's Supreme Court recently made a decision that their Elections Commissioner ILLEGALLY changed the voting laws. Changes which allowed a metric shit ton of otherwise ineligible votes to be counted as valid.

That's a lot of "fraudulent" votes and I'm fairly certain (without any supporting evidence other than the fact that there were enough of them to change the election results) that not all of them were cast in favor of Trump. Mostly because if they had been, he'd have been elected.

None of that suggests any truth in what Pubs are always complaining about, which is people voting in other peoples' names.

 

[YDB95]

The ruling in Wisconsin also doesn't mean all those votes were "otherwise ineligible" to be counted; it just means they wouldn't have been cast via drop-boxes because the drop-boxes wouldn't be there. Unless you're assuming that everyone who voted absentee via a drop-box would otherwise not have voted. Which is obviously what Republicans want, but that doesn't mean it would have happened.

 

[pecksniff]

Unless you're assuming that everyone who voted absentee via a drop-box would otherwise not have voted. Which is obviously what Republicans want

That's what all this election legislation is about, really. They can't get away with poll taxes or literacy tests any more, so they find other ways to erect obstacles to voting, obstacles which are statistically certain to filter out more votes of poor people, college students and POC than anybody else.

 

[YDB95]

That's what all this election legislation is about, really. They can't get away with poll taxes or literacy tests any more, so they find other ways to erect obstacles to voting, obstacles which are statistically certain to filter out more votes of poor people, college students and POC than anybody else.

My great hope is that they'll inspire all those groups to get out and vote in greater numbers, even if it means standing in line for six hours or whatever. There's one surefire way to get Americans to get off their asses and do something, and that's trying to stop them from doing it.

 

[Champakian]

That's what all this election legislation is about, really. They can't get away with poll taxes or literacy tests any more, so they find other ways to erect obstacles to voting, obstacles which are statistically certain to filter out more votes of poor people, college students and POC than anybody else.

Funny how you do not want your vote protected from nullification by illegal voting.
I find that fascinating because in my experience, the proponents generally see themselves as beneficiaries.

 

[HisArpy]

The Wisconsin Elections Commission is six people, and three of them are Republicans.

GO FUCK YOURSELF

 

[HisArpy]

None of that suggests any truth in what Pubs are always complaining about, which is people voting in other peoples' names.

Actually, the complaint is that the votes aren't LEGAL. Whether otherwise qualified voters cast them or not isn't the point. The process of casting a ballot is specified by the law and when the law is broken, then the resulting ballot is ILLEGAL and cannot be counted.

It's not that difficult to understand. Unless you refuse to and instead insist on deflecting to the meme that every vote be counted rather than insisting on every LEGAL vote being counted.

Which is how we wound up with an incompetent in the WH after 80 million votes were cast in his favor.

 

[HisArpy]

That's what all this election legislation is about, really. They can't get away with poll taxes or literacy tests any more, so they find other ways to erect obstacles to voting, obstacles which are statistically certain to filter out more votes of poor people, college students and POC than anybody else.

Yeah, I'm certain that the Supreme Court of Wisconsin made their decision on that basis.