Data From Around the World–Including Antarctica!–Show Omicron

[AlterErgo]

Data From Around the World–Including Antarctica!–Show Omicron Favoring the Fully Vaccinated. Favoring the Fully Vaccinated.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

For those wanting the story:

https://amgreatness.com/2021/12/31/...a-show-omicron-favoring-the-fully-vaccinated/

 

[JohnnySavage]

The Omicron feeds on the RF emitted by the tracking device injected with the vaccine.

 

[ll74]

That's great news for the unvaxxed, definitely.

 

[Champakian]

Bullshit. I said this a month ago based on the original researchers
and I was told, with much anger and consternation that I had made
up my mind too quickly (you know, I hate Fauci, Biden, the CDC, the WHO
the puppet masters of the CCP, etc., which means I'm NOT DOING SCIENCE!)
and the deaths and hospitalizations are a lagging indicator and give it TWO WEEKS!


And the deadline always starts every time that we don't have a DEATH SPIKE.

So starting today, you cannot make any conclusion for TWO WEEKS!

And after that, we will need another TWO WEEKS
because if the children go back to school...

They're ALL going to die!!!

Can you wait just another two, or three (any four) two weeks for SCIENCE!!!

Do you all think the earth is flat???

 

[AlterErgo]

https://charts.stocktwits.com/production/original_422813968.png

 

[Champakian]

The Omicron feeds on the RF emitted by the tracking device injected with the vaccine.

You know. I heard that. Now I have to believe it.

It sounds all sciency and smart and stuff...

 

[ll74]

Bullshit. I said this a month ago based on the original researchers
and I was told, with much anger and consternation that I had made
up my mind too quickly

"anger" - lol - you did make up your mind too quickly because there wasn't enough data to make that conclusion.

It's quite possible there isn't enough now to say definitively.

It's good to know that data suggests that this variant is hitting people less vulnerable to severe illness. I'm not angry about that in the slightest.

 

[Champakian]

You were WRONG!!!



You ignored the researchers because you find it politically expedient to fear the worse.

A Biden, Harris, AOC voter...

 

[ll74]

You were WRONG!!!



You ignored the researchers because you find it politically expedient to fear the worse.

A Biden, Harris, AOC voter...

One week after the variant was identified, I said that preliminary news was promising.

I didn't ignore anyone.

Are you sure that you're not the angry one here? Because it seems like you are.

 

[Champakian]

You were wrong.

You got up on your political soapbox and distributed nothing but chastisement.

 

[ll74]

You were wrong.

You got up on your political soapbox and distributed nothing but chastisement.

I said nothing that was wrong.

Lmao...funny to see you angry about it though. You were wrong at the time to make your conclusions. Whether you believe you had enough information or not..the truth is that you didn't And your conclusion being correct was by chance, not by objective reasoning

 

[Champakian]

You called it wrong; you said, you HAVE to wait!


You cannot claim that politically inconvenient truth.

IT's NOT MY VERSION OF HOW SCIENCE WORKS!!!

And if you cannot tell amused from angry, then you are simply wrong AGAIN!!!

 

[ll74]

You called it wrong; you said, you HAVE to wait!


You cannot claim that politically inconvenient truth.

IT's NOT MY VERSION OF HOW SCIENCE WORKS!!!

And if you cannot tell amused from angry, then you are simply wrong AGAIN!!!

You're the one using all caps and exclamation points...might be a clue

You made a guess, illogically, that seems to have been correct.

There...congrats!

Me calling you wrong for coming to the conclusion based on nothing was correct.

But I never claimed that your guess was incorrect. In fact, I said I hoped it was correct

 

[Champakian]

YOU were wrong. Accept responsibility - that iz your dog.

 

[ll74]

YOU were wrong. Accept responsibility - that iz your dog.

Wrong about what? Please specify

 

[Champakian]

You were busybody-level wrong abut how we had to wait
for some nebulous world-wide data when we had the
actual researchers telling us it was a mild variant.

First it was, they're South African they lie.
then it was other researchers in other countries
as it spread and still you wanted "more research."
You were simply politically motivated and it made you wrong
and as such you just knew/divined that everyone else had to be wrong...

You engaged in political science, not real science or you would have listened to science.

Did I say busybody-level wrong? I meant Trump-level fucking stupidity – that iz your dog.

 

[ll74]

No, you had one doctor talking about their patients and about a week's worth of data outside of that, much of it without sequencing of the virus to show omicron was the strain. It was not enough data to make a conclusion, which is why no real medical professional made any such thing and why you were guessing based on incomplete information. You can claim that you had sufficient information all you want....you absolutely did not, because no one in the world had sufficient information.Hell, even the one doctor who reported the mild symptoms didn't make that conclusion.

I never accused South Africans of lying.

You were busybody-level wrong abut how we had to wait
for some nebulous world-wide data when we had the
actual researchers telling us it was a mild variant.

First it was, they're South African they lie.
then it was other researchers in other countries
as it spread and still you wanted "more research."
You were simply politically motivated and it made you wrong
and as such you just knew/divined that everyone else had to be wrong...

You engaged in political science, not real science or you would have listened to science.

Did I say busybody-level wrong? I meant Trump-level fucking stupidity – that iz your dog.