Yes, the one that was threatened by lefty terrorist into convicting Chauvin.![]()
If that were the case, his lawyers could get the conviction overturned on appeal. Appellate courts are never intimidated.
They won't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, the one that was threatened by lefty terrorist into convicting Chauvin.![]()
If that were the case, his lawyers could get the conviction overturned on appeal. Appellate courts are never intimidated.
They won't.
And who was the aggressor. Did you forget that little tidbit?
Rittenhouse didn't even live in Wisconsin, never mind Kenosha. He drove up there looking for a fight, with a gun he couldn't legally buy himself. Sure looks like an aggressor to me.
Answered in court. Both you and the prosecution seem to be of the notion that it's illegal to 1.) Leave you're assigned city/town 2.) Cross a state line 3.) defend yourself. If you really bother to think about those items you begin to realize exactly how stupid those notions are.
Rittenhouse didn't even live in Wisconsin, never mind Kenosha. He drove up there looking for a fight, with a gun he couldn't legally buy himself. Sure looks like an aggressor to me.
Answered in court. Both you and the prosecution seem to be of the notion that it's illegal to 1.) Leave you're assigned city/town 2.) Cross a state line 3.) defend yourself. If you really bother to think about those items you begin to realize exactly how stupid those notions are.
You waste your breath on people like Will and YDB. It's not that they CAN'T see it, its that he WON'T see it.
Maybe, just maybe, in the moments before the vermin execute him and his family in the street in front of their burning home will he realize - oh wow! Is that what this was about....?
No law exists for idiocy...which Rittenhouse exemplifies.
March into a riot...as a antagonist to the folks their...wonder why the crowd turns on you and declare..." I had to defend myself".
That is good as the "I shot the black man because he walked down my side of the street...I felt my life threatened"...defense.
In the Arbuary case..." He was clearly up to no good".
Maybe I should try this approach with these racist white nationalists?
"Ashli Babbit, a tiny unarmed woman, was a lethal threat to Michael Byrd while climbing through a window several feet away
Rosenbaum, a child-raping mental patient, was not a lethal threat to Rittenhouse while chasing and assaulting him
This is the position held by many here."
-Matt Walsh.
He isnt wrong. Sad that some are defending a pedo who was attacking a minor. Luckily, the pedo picked the wrong victim.
Partisan victim blaming.
And a strong attempt of turning our justice system into little more of the same.
*shakes head*Lol. Sure tell yourself that.
One case was murder and the other was self defense but you know that and that the facts do not fit the narrative.
More prosecutorial misbehavior: The prosecution just "found" the drone video at the very end of the trial, after all evidence had been presented. Bad as that is, they also gave the defense a low-rez (480 x 1920) version of what they had.
Judge will chew them out and do fuck-all about these lying, dishonest creeps and incompetents.
And who was the aggressor. Did you forget that little tidbit?
Zimmerman was the aggressor. Martin was just walking past.
Kyle was stupid and his crying on the stand made him look weak as fuck. If he was innocent of murder, why are there two dead? Wandering around in a riot with a gun is not patriotic.
Where did they find that judge?![]()