LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Rittenhouse print will walk

pecksniff said:
The question was not about legal rights, it was about what defines a "gun nut."

A person who publishes flat Earth shit or TimeCube Guy physics or climate change denialism is exercising 1A rights, but is still a nut.
Click to expand...

You're a waste of time.
 
pecksniff said:
Anyone who owns more than two.
Click to expand...


You are a complete and utter moron.

I have 2-3 matched guns for each type of competition I shoot, and I shoot many different types of competition.

And self defense?? I dare you to try. House, car, motorcycle, boat, all stocked, all different, all ready to go.
 
CornusKousa said:
He absolutely fucking hates American values and the very structure of the USA.

Desperately wants to turn the place into USSSA.
Click to expand...

He's not exactly the most colorful Crayon in the box.

I'm learning to stop interacting with mental midgets.
 
Dribble said:
More violence guaranteed. It is what this country wants. It is what this country deserves
Click to expand...

It's definitely what the Left wants. No one boards up his store in fear of us mossbacks torching or looting it.
 
pecksniff said:
It's nothing to do with Constitution. One gun for home defense and one for hunting is all one reasonably needs. If you own more than two, then either you're a "gun nut" in the sense of being a collector, or there's something deeply wrong with you.
Click to expand...

You have no idea what you're talking about.
 
pecksniff said:
It's nothing to do with Constitution. One gun for home defense and one for hunting is all one reasonably needs.
Click to expand...

On what basis? I mean "hunting" is like 6 guns right there.

You don't hunt rodents with the same weapon you shoot Elk with.... shotguns for birds/snakes.

pecksniff said:
or there's something deeply wrong with you.
Click to expand...

What exactly is wrong with not adhering to your ignorant views??
 
Bud_Spencer said:
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Click to expand...

CornusKousa said:
On what basis? I mean "hunting" is like 6 guns right there.

You don't hunt rodents with the same weapon you shoot Elk with.... shotguns for birds/snakes.



What exactly is wrong with not adhering to your ignorant views??
Click to expand...

Why is it that those that know the least about a subject feel compelled to run their mouth about it?
 
Bud_Spencer said:
He must be a journalist.
Click to expand...

*chuckle*

Speaking of 'journalism.' It's easy to see why the usual suspects went all in on smearing Rittenhouse and continue to do so to this day. They jumped on the 'shite supremacist' bandwagon immediately after the shootings without doing any due diligence. Any thing to sell the story. Now an acquittal means they're ALL going to be writing really big checks to Rittenhouse and they know it. Even if Rittenhouse is found guilty on a lesser charge their ass is still in the wind.

So rather than issuing retractions when the facts started to become apparent and cutting their losses/exposure they double downed. Now I'm betting they're spending a lot of time with THEIR attorneys.
 
bellisarius said:
*chuckle*

Speaking of 'journalism.' It's easy to see why the usual suspects went all in on smearing Rittenhouse and continue to do so to this day. They jumped on the 'shite supremacist' bandwagon immediately after the shootings without doing any due diligence. Any thing to sell the story. Now an acquittal means they're ALL going to be writing really big checks to Rittenhouse and they know it. Even if Rittenhouse is found guilty on a lesser charge their ass is still in the wind.

So rather than issuing retractions when the facts started to become apparent and cutting their losses/exposure they double downed. Now I'm betting they're spending a lot of time with THEIR attorneys.
Click to expand...

CNN and MSNBC never, ever learn.
 
pecksniff said:
It's nothing to do with Constitution. One gun for home defense and one for hunting is all one reasonably needs. If you own more than two, then either you're a "gun nut" in the sense of being a collector, or there's something deeply wrong with you.
Click to expand...
Why did Rosa Parks "need" to sit at the front of the bus?

Rights have nothing to do with need. They are all about "Fuck you, that's why".
 
LittleDixie said:
Why did Rosa Parks "need" to sit at the front of the bus?

Rights have nothing to do with need. They are all about "Fuck you, that's why".
Click to expand...

And that's why civil rights piss the control freak authoritarians like Peck off so badly. :D
 
pecksniff said:
And the question had nothing to do with rights.
Click to expand...
the 2nd Amendment is a right.

The right to bear arms is a right. It doesn't need to be justified. You don't need to have a "need". It's a right. What is left to discuss?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ChinoMoreno
You really elected this guy? 🙅🏽‍♂️
3 4 5
Replies
106
Views
2K
Saint_Ann
Saint_Ann
Rightguide
Will Derek Chauvin Be Pardoned?
2 3 4
Replies
90
Views
2K
jomar
jomar
Rightguide
Democrats, Enjoy Your Fantasy As Long As You Can
Replies
6
Views
165
Politruk
P
P
The long, strange desclension of Republican presidents
2 3
Replies
66
Views
1K
Politruk
P
RobDownSouth
New York Times editorial praises Trump for belatedly realizing Netanyahu was using him
Replies
20
Views
433
BrightShinyGirl
BrightShinyGirl
Back
Top