The Clinton Dossier

BabyBoomer50s

Capitalist
Joined
Nov 27, 2018
Posts
13,809
My, my, my. Mr. Durham has certainly uncovered some interesting revelations. We now have zero doubt that what was once called “the Steele Dossier” was in fact “the Clinton Dossier”, funded by the Clinton campaign and sourced by Clinton operatives, most notably Charles Dolan. Those silly defensive claims that the Dossier was the work of President Trump’s GOP primary opponents have long been laid to rest.

Will any Clintons be indicted? I doubt it. But the ugly stain will be remain as indelible as presidential semen on a blue dress. And the reputations of the New York Times and other legacy media outlets that were complicit in perpetuating fake news are severely damaged. One such publication, the Washington Post, showed signs yesterday of sheepishly, and quietly, hinting at a lame confession.
 
Last edited:
Other than Fox, you would be hard-pressed to find any media reporting on this.

Therefore, it never happened; nothing but right-wing lies...
 
Other than Fox, you would be hard-pressed to find any media reporting on this.

Therefore, it never happened; nothing but right-wing lies...

True. Apparently NBC, CBS, ABC, and MSNBC said not a word when the story broke. It has been picked up in the print media though. Excellent coverage in the Wall Street Journal, and this stunning admission from the Washington Post: 'The indictment is likely to buttress Republican charges that Democrats and FBI agents intentionally or accidentally turned cheap partisan smears into a high-stakes national security investigation of a sitting president.'

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...76b9ae-3d77-11ec-8ee9-4f14a26749d1_story.html
 
It is the Big Lie that the Left wanted to believe with all their hearts and souls.

They are never going to let go of it, so anyone contradicting their myth
has to be denigrated and vilified, even destroyed...

It's nothing but right-wing misinformation.


:(


They eschew the true-true for the poli-true.
 
At some point, I think Durham is going to indict someone that the media can't ignore and then it will all come out.
 
Will any Clintons be indicted? I doubt it. But the ugly stain will be remain as indelible as presidential semen on a blue dress.

Doesn't matter. No stain will attach to the party, and HRC will never run for office again.

And the reputations of the New York Times and other legacy media outlets that were complicit in perpetuating fake news are severely damaged.

There was no fake news. The Russians did interfere in the 2016 election on Trump's behalf, and were in communication with his campaign. All we don't know is what Trump knew about it at the time.

Historians don't know how much Nixon knew about what CREEP was up to before the Watergate break-in -- but, it was his responsibility.
 
There was no fake news. The Russians did interfere in the 2016 election on Trump's behalf, and were in communication with his campaign. All we don't know is what Trump knew about it at the time.

No one as colluding with Russia. No one. That's what Mueller said in plain, black letters.

But it does seem that Clinton was.
 
Donald Trump was and is an espionage asset of the Russians and his campaign was up to its neck in being controlled and directed by the Russians. Folks have been and continue to be prosecuted and convicted for this. We're still in the investigation and trial phase of addressing treason that was performed out in the open and in front of TV cameras and mikes. No denying and lying by your board Trumpettes is going to change that.
 
Donald Trump was and is an espionage asset of the Russians and his campaign was up to its neck in being controlled and directed by the Russians. Folks have been and continue to be prosecuted and convicted for this. We're still in the investigation and trial phase of addressing treason that was performed out in the open and in front of TV cameras and mikes. No denying and lying by your board Trumpettes is going to change that.

Every word of this is a lie, including "and" and "the."
 
Keep dreaming, bud

No dreaming required...it's all in Durham's latest indictment. It was a Clinton operative that fed false information to Danchenko, which then got put into Steele's dossier. Do you think he acted alone?
 
Donald Trump was and is an espionage asset of the Russians and his campaign was up to its neck in being controlled and directed by the Russians. Folks have been and continue to be prosecuted and convicted for this. We're still in the investigation and trial phase of addressing treason that was performed out in the open and in front of TV cameras and mikes. No denying and lying by your board Trumpettes is going to change that.

you are nuts

but you know that
 
No one as colluding with Russia. No one. That's what Mueller said in plain, black letters.

But it does seem that Clinton was.

hmmmmm...yeah, right...

1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.

2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.

13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.


The rest of the list of findings here:
Mueller report - Summary of Major Findings



Comshaw
 
He said nothing of the kind and you know it.

"Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its
election interference activities." Pp 5


"Further, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election." Pp 9

"Ultimately , the investigation did not establish that the
Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities." Pp 173
 
hmmmmm...yeah, right...

1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.

2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.

13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.


The rest of the list of findings here:
Mueller report - Summary of Major Findings



Comshaw

I just cited the salient passages. Conclusion: No collusion.

Or maybe you can help Keith out by identifying those being prosecute for conspiring with the Russians
 
Donald Trump was and is an espionage asset of the Russians and his campaign was up to its neck in being controlled and directed by the Russians. Folks have been and continue to be prosecuted and convicted for this. We're still in the investigation and trial phase of addressing treason that was performed out in the open and in front of TV cameras and mikes. No denying and lying by your board Trumpettes is going to change that.

LMAO! And Pizzagate is real and the Clintons were in on it and they had Epstein killed in part because of it. Get help man.
 
"Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its
election interference activities." Pp 5


"Further, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election." Pp 9

"Ultimately , the investigation did not establish that the
Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities." Pp 173

Additionally, prosecutors will never say you didn't do something, only that there's no evidence. Understandably, they might have missed something. Having said that, the FBI has an unlisted budget Mueller's team isn't going to leave any stone unturned. If they didn't find anything, it's pretty safe to say there was nothing. This wasn't the D.A.'s office in Boise, Idaho with its limited budget.
 
Back
Top