LincolnDuncan
Thread hijacker
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2015
- Posts
- 6,648
Why did Manafort give polling data to a Russian operative?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, you are out of touch with the facts. There are no cases “relentlessly moving forward” having anything to do with Trump and Russia. Adam Schiff and Robert Mueller spent years chasing that rainbow, and came up with nothing. Not only has the hoax been exposed, Hillary was at the end of that rainbow.
Mr. Danchenko is out on $100K bail and has to hand his passport over the the judge by tomorrow.
Cyrus Vance and Leticia James have been looking into Trump Organization’s financials for over two years. Vance is gone now so his successor can chase the rabbit. None of it has to do with the debunked Russia Collusion hoax. The CFO of the Trump organization has been charged with not reporting certain expenses as income. Very common in tax disputes. We’ll see if it sticks. Questions about asset valuation for tax purposes and loan qualifications remain. President Trump has not been charged with anything. But keep dreaming. You’ve been doing it for years and it’s working for you, so I say stay with the therapy.![]()

Love it when you are sent scurrying to come back with a pack of Trumpian lies.
Donald Trump is sweating even if you aren't.
Naw, he isn't. He's just a temporary Trump hack job holdover.
Get used to hearing his name. He's going to be putting a lot of corrupt Democrats (BIRM) in prison soon.
Yeah, sure. Will probably see them when he's visiting Trump and Barr there.![]()
It's going to be especially fun reading your tirades when the indictments of top Dems come down.
Other than Fox, you would be hard-pressed to find any media reporting on this.
Therefore, it never happened; nothing but right-wing lies...
It's going to be especially fun reading your tirades when the indictments of top Dems come down.

His manhood is gone as well.
The big question is, and I'm sure Durham will ask it, How did Bob Mueller and Jim Comey miss this, or did they?
I just cited the salient passages. Conclusion: No collusion.
Or maybe you can help Keith out by identifying those being prosecute for conspiring with the Russians
Prosecuted, found guilty and pardoned by the President.
President Trump has pardoned his first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, who spent years enmeshed in an often bizarre legal war with the government that sprang from the Russia investigation.
Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to the FBI about his contacts with the Russian ambassador and then cooperated extensively with prosecutors.
https://www.npr.org/2020/11/25/823893821/trump-pardons-michael-flynn-who-pleaded-guilty-to-lying-about-russia-contact
The interesting thing here is both you and the OP would go fucking ape shit if Biden did likewise. It always astounds me how two faced people can be.
Comshaw
Not if Durham says those things, we don't.
It wasn’t Mueller, it was Andrew Weissmann who purposely covered over it. Bob Mueller was a stooge who probably didn’t know how the investigation was proceeding and only knew what Weissmann let him in on.
As incoming NSA, Flynn had a conversation with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak. He pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI during about that conversation. Is that the heart of the Russia Collusion hoax?![]()
As expected. Why in the world would he lie if there was nothing nefarious to hide? He was found out BECAUSE OF the Mueller investigation. Should we ignore it because it didn't have the word "collusion" tagged to it? Should we ignore it because it was found out during that investigation? Yeah, tell that to Ken Starr. Ya'll were ecstatic about maneuvering a president into, according to Ish's logic "a perjury trap" to get him to lie about a blow job so he could be impeached, but when someone is actually tried and found guilty, because that are on the same political side as you are it's a non-issue and shouldn't have happened.
You want to ignore Flynn and his actions, yet you would insist that Hillary needs to go to jail without ANY credible evidence that she was involved, because two people associated with her campaign have been, not tired, not found guilty but only indited? Really? And you want me or anyone to take you seriously?
As an aside, the investigation that yielded the indictments of these two individuals took 2 1/2 years. If I remember right, y'all were having a conniption fit because Mueller's investigation had gone on for mere months. Where's the outrage for one that has spanned years and yielded only these two indictments?
I should know better. Ain't no arguing with a stump.
Comshaw
As expected. Why in the world would he lie if there was nothing nefarious to hide? He was found out BECAUSE OF the Mueller investigation. Should we ignore it because it didn't have the word "collusion" tagged to it? Should we ignore it because it was found out during that investigation? Yeah, tell that to Ken Starr. Ya'll were ecstatic about maneuvering a president into, according to Ish's logic "a perjury trap" to get him to lie about a blow job so he could be impeached, but when someone is actually tried and found guilty, because that are on the same political side as you are it's a non-issue and shouldn't have happened.
You want to ignore Flynn and his actions, yet you would insist that Hillary needs to go to jail without ANY credible evidence that she was involved, because two people associated with her campaign have been, not tired, not found guilty but only indited? Really? And you want me or anyone to take you seriously?
As an aside, the investigation that yielded the indictments of these two individuals took 2 1/2 years. If I remember right, y'all were having a conniption fit because Mueller's investigation had gone on for mere months. Where's the outrage for one that has spanned years and yielded only these two indictments?
I should know better. Ain't no arguing with a stump.
Comshaw
FBI Agent In Flynn Case Had Doubts About Investigation, Document Shows
September 25, 202012:06 PM ET
Ryan Lucas in 2018
RYAN LUCAS
Michael Flynn, President Trump's former national security adviser, leaves the federal court following a status conference with Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 10, 2019.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
An FBI agent assigned to special counsel Robert Mueller's team told investigators he thought the probe into Michael Flynn was "unclear and disorganized" and that the former national security adviser wasn't conspiring with Russia.
That assessment from William Barnett is contained in a 13-page document summarizing an interview Barnett did on Sept. 17 with Justice Department investigators.
As expected. Why in the world would he lie if there was nothing nefarious to hide? He was found out BECAUSE OF the Mueller investigation. Should we ignore it because it didn't have the word "collusion" tagged to it? Should we ignore it because it was found out during that investigation? Yeah, tell that to Ken Starr. Ya'll were ecstatic about maneuvering a president into, according to Ish's logic "a perjury trap" to get him to lie about a blow job so he could be impeached, but when someone is actually tried and found guilty, because that are on the same political side as you are it's a non-issue and shouldn't have happened.
You want to ignore Flynn and his actions, yet you would insist that Hillary needs to go to jail without ANY credible evidence that she was involved, because two people associated with her campaign have been, not tired, not found guilty but only indited? Really? And you want me or anyone to take you seriously?
As an aside, the investigation that yielded the indictments of these two individuals took 2 1/2 years. If I remember right, y'all were having a conniption fit because Mueller's investigation had gone on for mere months. Where's the outrage for one that has spanned years and yielded only these two indictments?
I should know better. Ain't no arguing with a stump.
Comshaw
FBI Agent In Flynn Case Had Doubts About Investigation, Document Shows
September 25, 202012:06 PM ET
Ryan Lucas in 2018
RYAN LUCAS
Michael Flynn, President Trump's former national security adviser, leaves the federal court following a status conference with Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 10, 2019.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
An FBI agent assigned to special counsel Robert Mueller's team told investigators he thought the probe into Michael Flynn was "unclear and disorganized" and that the former national security adviser wasn't conspiring with Russia.
That assessment from William Barnett is contained in a 13-page document summarizing an interview Barnett did on Sept. 17 with Justice Department investigators.
The Flynn case has not been ignored by the media or by me. But it obviously does not support the now debunked claim that Trump was a Russian asset working with, colluding with, coordinating with, or any other term you prefer, to influence the 2016 election. If you want to pin your fantasy on the Flynn case, knock yourself out. Adam Schiff, the Inspector General, and Mueller spent years trying to find something to support the hoax and came up empty. Turns out that Steele Dossier was actually Clinton’s Dossier.![]()
As expected. No presented facts or cites, just unsubstantiated opinion from an extremely bias person. As I said, ain't no arguing with a stump.
I'm done.
Comshaw
As expected. Why in the world would he lie if there was nothing nefarious to hide? He was found out BECAUSE OF the Mueller investigation. Should we ignore it because it didn't have the word "collusion" tagged to it? Should we ignore it because it was found out during that investigation? Yeah, tell that to Ken Starr. Ya'll were ecstatic about maneuvering a president into, according to Ish's logic "a perjury trap" to get him to lie about a blow job so he could be impeached, but when someone is actually tried and found guilty, because that are on the same political side as you are it's a non-issue and shouldn't have happened.
You want to ignore Flynn and his actions, yet you would insist that Hillary needs to go to jail without ANY credible evidence that she was involved, because two people associated with her campaign have been, not tired, not found guilty but only indited? Really? And you want me or anyone to take you seriously?
As an aside, the investigation that yielded the indictments of these two individuals took 2 1/2 years. If I remember right, y'all were having a conniption fit because Mueller's investigation had gone on for mere months. Where's the outrage for one that has spanned years and yielded only these two indictments?
I should know better. Ain't no arguing with a stump.
Comshaw
I'm delighted that your weak whataboutisms don't hold water and that it pisses you off to try to make so much out of so little, Million.![]()