"CRT isn't taught in Virginia"

I did no such thing.

Really....then what is this little post below about?


That's truly hilarious. I've been around school teachers for 30 years, and 80% of them will leap at the chance to performatively prove their wokeness. The lunatic fringe that came out to shout and scream at the very thought that CRT would in any way be curtailed in our schools was about 60% teachers and another 15% administrators.

No what I pointed out, is the courses are not "mandatory" and there is no evidence of how many teachers will apply. Also note the word apply, does not equal being accepted into the course either.

You're the one making the idiotic assumption not a single teacher will attend.

I never claimed it would BE zero, I stated it COULD be zero....learn to read and comprehend what a person has written.

Don't read into a post your perceived political bias, and you might be a bit more successful,and have less of these posts correcting your foolishness....(idiot)
 
Yes, based on my observations of school teachers over 30 years, I predicted that 80% would be temperamentally and ideologically amenable to attending. That is true.

If that percentage is similar in Louisville, and I don't doubt that it is, and given the number of teachers in the area, the probability of not a single teacher signing up - your insane claim - is vanishingly small. Zero, in fact.

Given that the CRT curriculum is already in LPS, though, it hardly matters...it'd be just a refresher course, essentially.
 
*chuckles* sure you did Bud....sure you did....btw self-editing is hard, I get that, but you can do better.

You two sure jump on any error in spelling, syntax or grammar like a starving dog on a rotting bone, I'll say that. You must be so proud!
 
Yes, based on my observations of school teachers over 30 years, I predicted that 80% would be temperamentally and ideologically amenable to attending. That is true.

Quit dragging my statement in to cover up your lie. You stated the percentage, then denied you ever state it....why does this feel like a Luk thread....
 
Last edited:
You two sure jump on any error in spelling, syntax or grammar like a starving dog on a rotting bone, I'll say that. You must be so proud!

This is a location dedicated to writing, or the written word, which ever you prefer, as such, spelling and grammar count.

I guess you always felt the English subject teachers were mean, when they highlighted your spelling and grammar and punctuation errors, right?
 
Quit dragging my statement in to cover up your lie. You stated the percentage, then denied you ever state it....why does this feel like a Luk thread....

It was meant to convey a high probability. I stand by it. It feel like a Luk thread because, like him, you heat the furnace of your hate to the point it singes yourself.
 
Last edited:
This is a location dedicated to writing, or the written word, which ever you prefer, as such, spelling and grammar count.

I guess you always felt the English subject teachers were mean, when they highlighted your spelling and grammar and punctuation errors, right?

No I always appreciated their correction, along with that of my Latin, Spanish and Portuguese teachers. But they, to a person, were always trying to make me smarter about language, not desperately looking for something - anything - to throw at me. Like the port side here.
 
It was meant to convey a high probability. I stand by it. It feels like a Luk thread because, like him, you heat the furnace of your hate to the point it singes yourself.

What hate?

Why do all you RWCJ's resort to emotions?

I have said numerous times CRT is a boogeyman to you people. It will not affect me in anyway shape or form. So how come you think I hate it ( or perhaps you meant "hate you"...no worries there Bud, I don't hate you, or like you)
 
What hate?

Why do all you RWCJ's resort to emotions?

I have said numerous times CRT is a boogeyman to you people. It will not affect me in anyway shape or form. So how come you think I hate it ( or perhaps you meant "hate you"...no worries there Bud, I don't hate you, or like you)

Francis Bacon noted that it's not the lie you tell others that harms one's soul, but the lies you tell yourself.
 
No I always appreciated their correction, along with that of my Latin, Spanish and Portuguese teachers. But they, to a person, were always trying to make me smarter about language, not desperately looking for something - anything - to throw at me. Like the port side here.

See again you read something into fact that is not. For example, I am a Canadian, I vote for the PC party, which is right, compared to the other political party options.

Yet you claim I am a "port sider" (btw do you know why ships sides are called port and starboard, not left n right....)

I am not trying to belittle you by pointing out your errors, however this is a written word site, you should really try and be 100% correct on spelling, grammar and punctuation. After all,most of your posts are under 50 words....editing your work should not be much of a chore.

Given the effort you put into trying to get CRT outlawed, maybe that is why you don't put the effort into your grammar.
 
Admit it. Censoring an opposing viewpoint is what you want.

That's true. Other viewpoints I want censored in schools I'm paying for:

* Phrenology
* Astrology
* Scientology
* Eugenics
* Alchemy

And for the same reason as CRT should be eschewed: It's a baseless, crackpot theory that is destructive to actual learning. If you want to organize a symposium outside of class time, knock yourself out.
 
That's true. Other viewpoints I want censored in schools I'm paying for:

* Phrenology
* Astrology
* Scientology
* Eugenics
* Alchemy

And for the same reason as CRT should be eschewed: It's a baseless, crackpot theory that is destructive to actual learning. If you want to organize a symposium outside of class time, knock yourself out.

There's a lot more substance to CRT than there is to astrology.
 
See again you read something into fact that is not. For example, I am a Canadian, I vote for the PC party, which is right, compared to the other political party options.

Yet you claim I am a "port sider" (btw do you know why ships sides are called port and starboard, not left n right....)

I am not trying to belittle you by pointing out your errors, however this is a written word site, you should really try and be 100% correct on spelling, grammar and punctuation. After all,most of your posts are under 50 words....editing your work should not be much of a chore.

Given the effort you put into trying to get CRT outlawed, maybe that is why you don't put the effort into your grammar.

It keeps me humble.

I'll keep in mind that you're not a southpaw, even as I see you line up in lockstep with every port-side view here.
 
There's a lot more substance to CRT than there is to astrology.

Not really. All they have as proof for any of their "theory" (which isn't really a theory) is that there are disparities between races, which they attribute exclusively to racism. It makes astrology look like a model of rigor by comparison.
 
It keeps me humble.

I'll keep in mind that you're not a southpaw, even as I see you line up in lockstep with every port-side view here.

You people are so far right, I don't think I could ever move that far. Is that my fault?

Efficient government, fiscal responsible policies and reasonable social freedoms(is what I support and believe in)have fuck all to do with 99% of the shit the RWCJ complains about around here.

In fact, a good portion of items complained about by the RWCJ are over fear....gun control = taking away ALL guns. Illegal imigration = Americans losing jobs ( sure Americans want to work for dollars per day...)CRT = something that scares the fuck out of you, what that is, I don't really know, but I suspect it is in your racist views....

No there is no further Right side with you and your kind....just the left.....and you conveniently see past the centralist....
 
Last edited:
You people are so far right, I don't think I could ever move that far. Is that my fault?

Efficient government, fiscal responsible policies and reasonable social freedoms(is what I support and believe in)have fuck all to do with 99% of the shit the RWCJ complains about around here.

In fact, a good portion of items complained about by the RWCJ are over fear....gun control = taking away ALL guns. Illegal imigration = Americans losing jobs ( sure Americans want to work for dollars per day...)CRT = something that scares the fuck out of you, what that is, I don't really know, but I suspect it is in your racist views....

No there is no further Right side with you and your kind....just the left.....and you conveniently see past the centralist....

Act like a centrist and you might be seen as one. Leap the length of your chain for CRT and you ain't foolin' anyone.

Now go fulminate about my "ain't" since you ain't got nuthin' else.
 
Pud's CRT(Critical Race Tourettes) has been triggered bigly for "some" reason.

Could it be the Virginia Gubernatorial election???

Hmmmm.......
 
Pud's CRT(Critical Race Tourettes) has been triggered bigly for "some" reason.

Could it be the Virginia Gubernatorial election???

Hmmmm.......

Very perceptive, given that MacAuliffe has been lying about CRT not being in VA schools. As i showed conclusively, it is.
 
Act like a centrist and you might be seen as one. Leap the length of your chain for CRT and you ain't foolin' anyone.

Now go fulminate about my "ain't" since you ain't got nuthin' else.

I never said I was a centralist?

You really have a reading comprehension problem....

I said that you (RWCJ) sees past the centralist, and only sees the Left.
 
Last edited:
I never said I was a centralist?

You really have a reading comprehension problem....

I said the you (RWCJ) sees past the centralist, and only sees the Left.

I presumed you were calling yourself a "centralist" to which I repeat the oft-seen **chuckle**.
 
I presumed you were calling yourself a "centralist" to which I repeat the oft-seen **chuckle**.

Some advice, "don't assume" read....and yes I *chuckle* at the shit you ( and many others) post. It is why I come here....I am not trying to "debate"your view point.
 
Back
Top