"CRT isn't taught in Virginia"

[Lazaran]

https://scontent.ftpa1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/249356724_374618324446994_2792969314776746715_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&_nc_rgb565=1&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=-e_60v1exf8AX9gh8Kc&_nc_ht=scontent.ftpa1-2.fna&oh=aa811234fff2fea0f031a2afeb1048a3&oe=61A6EA5C

Post of the year.

/PB

 

[Lazaran]

response:

"TEACHING ABOUT HOW RACISM HELD BACK AMERICANS OF A DIFFERENT SKIN COLOR/CLASS/CASTE/RELIGION/SEXUAL ORIENTATION/GENDER IS RACIST!!!!!!"

"WHY COULDN'T YOU PEOPLE BE SATISFIED WITH NAMING HOLIDAYS AND MEMORIALIZING STREETS AFTER THE PEOPLE WE MURDERED FOR PROTESTING FOR THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS? THAT SHOULD'VE BEEN ENOUGH FOR YOU!!!!"

"ARRRRGHHHH?!!!!! ARRRRRRGGGGGH!!!! OOOOOAAAAARRRGGGGHHHH!!!" (fires guns into sky in an outburst of hyper-masculine frustration with no healthy outlet for healing)

Response of the year.

/PB

 

[CornusKousa]

Post of the year.

/PB

Already been destroyed.

What's CRT got to do with basic history???

Nothing. It's about framing white people as evil racist.

 

[phrodeau]

I'll give you an example, since you two are impervious to abstraction:

Imagine this word problem given to students in Math class:

"Twenty settlers move onto 500 acres of Choctaw land in January.
In February, the settlers determine they need more land and have the cavalry force the Choctaw off another 600 acres. The Choctaw are paid with ten gallons of whiskey. How much is each gallon of whiskey worth in terms of stolen land?"

The course says "Math." No CRT found on any text or materials.

What is being taught here?

Not a word about race. Which words do you have a problem with?

 

[Bud_Spencer]

He teachers graduate level courses, not K-12 courses. From your link.


"In the course about racial inequality in K-12 public education that I designed and teach for graduate public-policy students, CRT is a valuable framework for helping students identify how law and policy can either entrench or eradicate historic racial inequities in education."

Comprehension is not your strong suit, Sarge.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Exactly what do you have against teaching children that racism was and is a problem in our society? How else do you ever intend to defeat racism?

Not to mention that's still not even really what CRT is. CRT pertains directly to the study of law. It's reasonable to say teaching children that racism was a real thing that has influenced our country for the worse is aligned with CRT, but it's still not the same thing. More fundamentally, though, I find it telling that you have a problem with what you think CRT is. Even setting aside that you're wrong about that, I don't see why anyone wouldn't want our children to learn that racism is bad. In fact, I can only think of one reason why you would and that...does not reflect well at all on you.

My synopsis of CRT comes directly from boosters of the crackpot ideology itself.

And CRT does not tech wht you say, it teaches what I posted. And they don't even try to prove its veracity, that is simply assumed.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Not a word about race. Which words do you have a problem with?

The point, hobbit, is that you don't have to have a textbook and worksheets emblazoned with CRT for CRT to be taught.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

And CRT does not tech wht you say, it teaches what I posted.

Let us hope the above sentence is not an example of how you teach....


FFS edit your work.....

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Let us hope the above sentence is not an example of how you teach....


FFS edit your work.....

Yes, Karen.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

The point, hobbit, is that you don't have to have a textbook and worksheets emblazoned with CRT for CRT to be taught.

What I find hilarious about your venomous hate of CRT is, In Canada it is completely apropos when viewed through the lens of how our indigenous peoples have been treated.

It is nearly 100% accurate, and our country has been moving to correct the issues in our countries systemic racism towards these fellow Canadians.

Yet here you are, claiming it is a bad thing to educate youth about it.

To me, all that shows is you really don't want systemic racism to disappear. Why? Well that might be because it would affect you personally to not have a system built in advantage over other visible races.

I really wish I could blind all you racist fuckers, then how would you discriminate? Smell?

 

[Bud_Spencer]

What I find hilarious about your venomous hate of CRT is, In Canada it is completely apropos when viewed through the lens of how our indigenous peoples have been treated.

It is nearly 100% accurate, and our country has been moving to correct the issues in our countries systemic racism towards these fellow Canadians.

Yet here you are, claiming it is a bad thing to educate youth about it.

To me, all that shows is you really don't want systemic racism to disappear. Why? Well that might be because it would affect you personally to not have a system built in advantage over other visible races.

I really wish I could blind all you racist fuckers, then how would you discriminate? Smell?

Youstill don't want to admit what CRT is, so there's no point in debating you.

 

[Lazaran]

Let us hope the above sentence is not an example of how you teach....


FFS edit your work.....

Deplorables like Pud ALWAYS fuck up their posts when they realize they are LOSING.

Pud's CRT( Critical Race Tourettes) also interferes with his ability to formulate coherent arguments and type them out.

JFC

SAD!!!

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Youstill don't want to admit what CRT is, so there's no point in debating you.

I don't debate with idiots, if you think I am when I quote you, well that is just another thing you got wrong today.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

I don't debate with idiots, if you think I am when I quote you, well that is just another thing you got wrong today.

There's no point in debating over a definition that is false, and your definition of CRT has no bearing on reality. There's no good excuse for it, so I have to assume your approach is to use deceit, like most defenders of this indefensible faith.

 

[phrodeau]

The point, hobbit, is that you don't have to have a textbook and worksheets emblazoned with CRT for CRT to be taught.

Then rewrite your math problem with the same examples, in a manner acceptable to you. You’ll probably want to use different words than “force” and “stolen.”

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Then rewrite your math problem with the same examples, in a manner acceptable to you. You’ll probably want to use different words than “force” and “stolen.”

Able buys 500 pieces of gum. Baker buys another 600 and they put them all into a bowl. They spent $10.00 together. How many pieces of gum can you get for $1?

See? That's math word problem. The original is propaganda, and is largely how CRT is conveyed to students: It's never announced as being CRT.

It's essentially what the Germans called "GLEICHSCHALTUNG."

 

[KeithD]

I'm not a bit surprised that racists don't want the history of racism taught in the classroom.

 

[WillJ8787]

Then explain why CRT has anything to do with basic US history??



^^ Has literally nothing to do with CRT.

You don't need to put everything through the lens of race and hyper-racialize everything while promoting hatred of whitey, to teach basic history.

You just need a regular ass history curriculum. That's it. No special bullshit needed.

There is ONLY one reason to racialize everything and demonize any single race as baddy oppressors and other races innocent victims of the other, of the baddies (clearly as determined by their race) and that is because you're a racist piece of shit.

The end.

I don't use one lens that is racist.....my pb&j sandwich today wasn't racist or made from racism....the math I did in math class in high school wasn't racist.

Even my history teacher, who left out most of the details of black history (and other types of history as well) wasn't a racist...that teacher was systematic leaving out details as a result of the system of education that informs all teachers that one paragraph is the only paragraph they will teach. Better teachers, I've heard there are a few around, did dive more deeply into "real" history. Teachers have limits, systemic limits....in how they were educated, in what they can present due to curriculum controlled and enforced by Administration (Principles, School Boards) and the parents, who still exercise significant influence....these are systemic limits. Parents are only as informed as their education....they were exposed to the same systemic limits that did not teach accurate history.

Only, when you leave the realm of public funding for education do you start to get the real deal and even then, not everywhere and during every generation. It is baked into the system....CRT isn't a curriculum at all so it could never be taught as such...it is a conglomeration of accurate research that identifies how those who ran the society long ago set the agenda for public schools, govt, police and other entities....that systematically had racism built into it... because their view were white centric (that's where racism gets it start).

Has this diminished over the years, last ten year.... absolutely!
And we have a long way to go...the evident is right here on this board.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

I'm not a bit surprised that racists don't want the history of racism taught in the classroom.

That isn't what CRT is. It's not even a theory, as it claims. It's a theology.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

CRT isn't a curriculum at all so it could never be taught as such...it is a conglomeration of accurate research that identifies how those who ran the society long ago set the agenda for public schools, govt, police and other entities....that systematically had racism built into it.

No, it's not.

And CRT denies that any advancement has been made. None. It also rejects civil rights, neutral principles of law and rationality. Those used to be liberal values. Alas, no more.

 

[WillJ8787]

No, it's not.

And CRT denies that any advancement has been made. None. It also rejects civil rights, neutral principles of law and rationality. Those used to be liberal values. Alas, no more.

It is easy to think what ever you want...it will mostly.be incorrect though.

Nobody is denying anything....no active response about CRT is happening except that whackadoodles have it in their minds, because of right wing white nationalist propaganda, that it is a thing. It ain't.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

It is easy to think what ever you want...it will mostly.be incorrect though.

“Unlike traditional civil rights, which embraces incrementalism and step-by-step progress, critical race theory questions the very foundations of the liberal order, including equality theory, legal reasoning, Enlightenment rationalism, and neutral principles of constitutional law.”

From Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, first edition, p. 3.

Care to revise and extend your remarks?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Comprehension is not your strong suit, Sarge.

Then in what way does the article you cited support you claims in anyway?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

There's no point in debating over a definition that is false, and your definition of CRT has no bearing on reality. There's no good excuse for it, so I have to assume your approach is to use deceit, like most defenders of this indefensible faith.

https://i.gifer.com/9iUk.gif

 

[WillJ8787]

“Unlike traditional civil rights, which embraces incrementalism and step-by-step progress, critical race theory questions the very foundations of the liberal order, including equality theory, legal reasoning, Enlightenment rationalism, and neutral principles of constitutional law.”

From Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, first edition, p. 3.

Care to revise and extend your remarks?

It's a book on Amazon and other book sellers....so yeah, what's your point? Where is it being taught?

Last time I checked I can order Mein Kampf on Amazon as well.