Ex-Pub: MAGAts combine anarchism with authoritarianism

pecksniff

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Posts
22,077
Article.

Anarchists and authoritarians are two different things. While authoritarians want a heavy-handed government — whether they're far-right fascists or far-left communists — dedicated anarchists have an intense disdain for government in general. But Never Trump conservative Max Boot, this week in his Washington Post column, argues that MAGA Republicans have managed to combine elements of anarchy with far-right authoritarianism.

Boot, a former Republican who supported now-President Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election, writes, "Are Republicans anarchists or authoritarians? They are both…. Most on the right refuse to accept the authority of any institution they do not control, and they will go to any lengths to undermine it…. Once right-wingers take command of an institution — whether the Supreme Court or the 23 states where Republicans control the governorship and both chambers of the legislature — they will do everything possible to ensure compliance with their diktats."

The 51-year-old Boot is politically right-wing himself, but he believes that the Republican Party took a dangerously authoritarian turn when it embraced Trumpism in 2016. The Post columnist has often said that one doesn't have to be a liberal to support liberal democracy. And in his Post column, Boot argues that the Trumpified GOP is combining elements of anarchy and far-right authoritarianism — at least for now — in the hope of establishing a "white Christian" state in the U.S. But they would gladly do away with the anarchy part after taking control, according to Boot.

"Republicans are fighting…. to establish a state in which conservative white Christians are in charge," Boot explains. "But until that happens, they will undermine every institution that they perceive as being under the control of their progressive foes. That is a long list, since Republicans are ludicrously convinced that the left has hijacked even institutions such as big business and the military."
 
Of course, it is not so much a matter of ideological confusion as pure ends-justify-the-means cynicism. Down with the State! Until we control it!
 
Of course, it is not so much a matter of ideological confusion as pure ends-justify-the-means cynicism. Down with the State! Until we control it!

Just like Democrats.

About time (R)'s caught up and started playing the game.

Don't be mad when you get a full dose of your own meds, Texas was just the trial.
 
lol



White Supremacists lurk in every shadow...



Your President is a whiter shade of pale.
 
Does the thread starter have a grasp on the substance of the term oxymoron?



Authoritarian anarchists?



"What are you rebelling against?"
"What have you got?"
 
Just like Democrats.

Only, the Dems ain't all "Down with the State!" to begin with. There was plenty of seething about the election of W and Trump via EC vote with a popular-vote minority and a lot of "Not my president!" talk, but never more than talk, no riots or insurrections. (Such riots as have been associated with BLM protests had nothing to do with the party -- nothing at all -- and had no clear insurrectionary political direction.)
 
Does the thread starter have a grasp on the substance of the term oxymoron?



Authoritarian anarchists?



"What are you rebelling against?"
"What have you got?"

The oxymoronicity, if that be a word, is rather the point of the linked article.
 
Back
Top