Court Tells OhNO!News to fuck off and pay up.

[jaF0]

Court Rules Rachel Maddow Calling OAN 'Russian Propaganda' Protected by First Amendment

Newsweek on MSN.com|3 hours ago

"The challenged statement was an obvious exaggeration, cushioned within an undisputed news story," the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...ganda-protected-by-first-amendment/ar-AANqAgG

 

[Cubantripod]

She's entitled to that opinion. Just like anyone with common sense knows she's establishment propaganda.

 

[phrodeau]

OAN contributor Kristian Rouz was being paid by Putin.

 

[AlexBailey]

Reality check.

Watch the first half hour of night's episode ( 8/16/2021 ) of the Rachel Maddow show then look up last night's Tucker Carlson show. Watch both shows and come back and tell us which show gave more relevant information compared to which one spouted more opinionated rants, which show had more relevant interviews, and which show displays more journalistic integrity.

 

[phrodeau]

Reality check.

Watch the first half hour of night's episode ( 8/16/2021 ) of the Rachel Maddow show then look up last night's Tucker Carlson show. Watch both shows and come back and tell us which show gave more relevant information compared to which one spouted more opinionated rants, which show had more relevant interviews, and which show displays more journalistic integrity.

Why compare to Tucker Carlson? Is he the best out there?

Maybe we should compare Brian Kilmeade to Brian Williams?

 

[ll74]

Why compare to Tucker Carlson? Is he the best out there?

Maybe we should compare Brian Kilmeade to Brian Williams?

Fucker Carlton tells the truth that all those libtard crybabies want to plug their ears for

 

[pecksniff]

She's entitled to that opinion. Just like anyone with common sense knows she's establishment propaganda.

Neither party is any more the establishment than the other.

 

[HisArpy]

"Obvious exaggeration" = knowingly false. Something the 9th circuit knows but somehow seemed to not be able to say.

Not that that's unusual for the 9th circuit.