An American national election is impossible to rig

pecksniff

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Posts
22,077
Because the system is "hyperfederalized," run by county officials. Even a state secretary of state has a very limited role. To rig an election would require bribing or otherwise subverting officials in more than 3,000 separate offices, or at least enough of those to swing enough votes, and to keep it secret would also be impossible -- you can't rely on the discretion of that many people.
 
Because the system is "hyperfederalized," run by county officials. Even a state secretary of state has a very limited role. To rig an election would require bribing or otherwise subverting officials in more than 3,000 separate offices, or at least enough of those to swing enough votes, and to keep it secret would also be impossible -- you can't rely on the discretion of that many people.

That's why it's not even close to 3000.

A couple counties in the right states, GG.

Such as 2020, Biden only won by 140k votes in less than a dozen counties across 4 states.

Not that hard.
 
There is no standard ballot, ballot box, or method of sealing and certifying the boxes. A successful counterfeiter would have to match the ballot layout, box specifications, and whatever special codes the officials agreed to use that day.
 
then lets do a 50 State Audit

and show us the fools we are!

simple!

They've done multiple audits in multiple states.

You've already been shown as the fools you are.

Simple!
 
explain this


Republican senators warned of potential 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines prior to 2020 election

Explain what? That Republican Senators publicly made a statement to rally their base to the polls and to back their leaders bullshit?

Seems kinda self explanatory
 
explain this


Republican senators warned of potential 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines prior to 2020 election
Hand recounts showed no vote switching in machines. No butterfly ballots, no hanging chads, no busloads of ineligible voters.
 
oh

Im sorry, it wasnt REPOZ

EXPLAIN THIS


Democratic senators warned of potential 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines prior to 2020 election

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...g-machines-prior-to-2020-election/ar-BB1aZAYf


Revealed: Klobuchar, Warren Sent Letter Warning About Dominion, Other Election Tech in 2019

https://www.westernjournal.com/reve...t-letter-warning-dominion-election-tech-2019/


STFU about it cant happen

NO ONE BELIEVES IDIOT*BIDEN GOT 81 MILLION VOTES


Trump was ahead in 5 of 6 swing States when THEY ALL DECIDED TO STOP COUNTING at around the same time

When They restarted all leads were gone

IMPOSSIBLE!

Warning about potential issues is not proof of issues.

Speculation is not evidence.

No state committed massive fraud.

Biden received 81 million votes.
 
NIGGER response

they were worried cause they HAD REASON TO WORRY

and they were right

but the votes were counted for Idiot*Biden away from Trump

Yes, I get that you believe that.
 
Because the system is "hyperfederalized," run by county officials. Even a state secretary of state has a very limited role. To rig an election would require bribing or otherwise subverting officials in more than 3,000 separate offices, or at least enough of those to swing enough votes, and to keep it secret would also be impossible -- you can't rely on the discretion of that many people.

Not when the computer network used by all states is hacked.
 
Yes, I get that you believe that.

It's proof until proven otherwise. Say what you want that presentation by Dr. Frank this morning was damning, mathematically laid out in great detail, and highly credible, using Dominion and official country source electronic data. There's nothing invented here.
 
Originally Posted by Rightguide View Post
Not when the computer network used by all states is hacked.

By Hugo Chavez in cahoots with the Vatican and China?:rolleyes:

50 states, but only one computer network, I thought the US was more advanced than Haiti. Guess I was wrong....rightguide has shown me the light on how fucking backward the USA really is.....*chuckles*
 
It's proof until proven otherwise. Say what you want that presentation by Dr. Frank this morning was damning, mathematically laid out in great detail, and highly credible, using Dominion and official country source electronic data. There's nothing invented here.

That's not actually how it works. The accepted truth is that the election was fair and no widespread fraud exists.

Pillow guy must prove his claim.

Pillow guy has not done so as no one has corroborated or accepted his evidence.

In one county, I've already seen that the "hacking data" was complete bullshit.

Several audits were conducted already and verified. He would need to explain why those audits were incorrect as well.
 
That's not actually how it works. The accepted truth is that the election was fair and no widespread fraud exists.

Pillow guy must prove his claim.

Pillow guy has not done so as no one has corroborated or accepted his evidence.

In one county, I've already seen that the "hacking data" was complete bullshit.

Several audits were conducted already and verified. He would need to explain why those audits were incorrect as well.

I think wrongway, the piece of shit, is refering to Douglas Frank, a "part time" math "teacher"?

Anyhow just a snippet of an examination of Frank's calculations below....

"His estimate ( Douglas Franks numbers, to be clear) isn’t just off by nine percent,” writes Engen. “The number he’s using for verification is too! This isn’t an isolated incident, he’s using incorrect ballots cast figures as the basis for his entire analysis. You can’t get a real result when the underlying data you use is wrong.

Plus this!!

This isn’t Frank’s first rodeo. He authored a similarly flawed but widely shared Facebook post, “Why is the Epidemic Fading?” last August, which was quickly debunked by the Associated Press.


wrongway, always good for a laugh.....

https://coloradotimesrecorder.com/2...till-abound-among-colorado-republicans/35621/
 
That's not actually how it works.

You don't know "how it works," so shut the fuck up with that crap. The people he's presenting are proving the claim, they did the research, and showing all "how it works," not him.
 
I think wrongway, the piece of shit, is refering to Douglas Frank, a "part time" math "teacher"?

Anyhow just a snippet of an examination of Frank's calculations below....

"His estimate ( Douglas Franks numbers, to be clear) isn’t just off by nine percent,” writes Engen. “The number he’s using for verification is too! This isn’t an isolated incident, he’s using incorrect ballots cast figures as the basis for his entire analysis. You can’t get a real result when the underlying data you use is wrong.

Plus this!!

This isn’t Frank’s first rodeo. He authored a similarly flawed but widely shared Facebook post, “Why is the Epidemic Fading?” last August, which was quickly debunked by the Associated Press.


wrongway, always good for a laugh.....

https://coloradotimesrecorder.com/2...till-abound-among-colorado-republicans/35621/

I'm not familiar with him, but I've noticed a pattern of speculation followed by extrapolation, all being accepted as a factual interpretation of the election.

First of all, speculation cannot be offered as factual evidence.

Second of all, in order to extrapolate any amount of datasets, it's very difficult to even estimate rough numbers...most of the time your margin of error will be off the charts. To accept that as any amount of truth is laughable, at best.
 
You don't know "how it works," so shut the fuck up with that crap. The people he's presenting are proving the claim, they did the research, and showing all "how it works," not him.

Yes, I get that you believe that.
 
so you cant show any State that DID a full audit and the result

RIGHT?

RIGHT!

attachment.php


You don't even understand how audits work.
 
I'm not familiar with him, but I've noticed a pattern of speculation followed by extrapolation, all being accepted as a factual interpretation of the election.

First of all, speculation cannot be offered as factual evidence.

Second of all, in order to extrapolate any amount of datasets, it's very difficult to even estimate rough numbers...most of the time your margin of error will be off the charts. To accept that as any amount of truth is laughable, at best.

But you do understand, that anything that points to validation of the "stolen election" theory gets eaten up by the mental midgets such as wrongway.
 
Back
Top