Penn U.S. Attorney Prevented From Investigating Voter Fraud

[Rotadom]

Mark Davis the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues was just stated on the news that 100,000 plus ballots were illegally cast in Georgia by people who were not registered to vote in the county they voted in.

That sure the heck isn't hard proof. And Trump said it was the most secure election in history -- that is until the counts were finalized

 

[Rightguide]

It is very hard to believe Barr would have blocked publication of any actual evidence of voter fraud.

You can read the U.S. Attorney's full letter at the link I provided. Are you saying he lied? I seriously doubt it.

 

[Rightguide]

That sure the heck isn't hard proof. And Trump said it was the most secure election in history -- that is until the counts were finalized

I say it was hard proof, seeing how he has access to the official databases. I do understand your intransigence however.

 

[Rotadom]

I say it was hard proof, seeing how he has access to the official databases. I do understand your intransigence however.

As long as you say so Where's the official report and findings that have been filed? WHAR?!

I do understand your need to grasp at straws that out of a short man's reach.

And Mark Davis is CEO, CFO, and Secretary of his own biased company. lol.

 

[ll74]

Mark Davis the president of Data Productions Inc. and an expert in voter data analytics and residency issues was just stated on the news that 100,000 plus ballots were illegally cast in Georgia by people who were not registered to vote in the county they voted in.

Shocker. Then it must be true!

lmao

 

[Fuzzy1975]

That sure the heck isn't hard proof. And Trump said it was the most secure election in history -- that is until the counts were finalized

*chuckles*

Georgia, isn't that where the state had three recounts, including one that was manual? Cost like 3 million, and they found what; a phone call from DJT to the Secretary of State, where Trump asked him to "find" those 11,000 votes...now Wrongway is claiming it was 100,000 votes???

Trumps lawyers lost over 60 cases in court, and now one of Trumps lawyers is facing disbarment, another is getting close to facing disbarment, for launching frivolous law suits.

Yet no voter fraud uncovered, except for a few minor cases, not enough to sway the balance of the outcome.

I am not sure who picks dumber hills to die on, wrongway, or HisArpy....well I have to give the honour to wrongway, because he is just a peice of shit.

 

[Rightguide]

Shocker. Then it must be true!

lmao

Well he is well known, and in possession of the official databases.

 

[Rightguide]

*chuckles*

Georgia, isn't that where the state had three recounts, including one that was manual? Cost like 3 million, and they found what; a phone call from DJT to the Secretary of State, where Trump asked him to "find" those 11,000 votes...now Wrongway is claiming it was 100,000 votes???

Trumps lawyers lost over 60 cases in court, and now one of Trumps lawyers is facing disbarment, another is getting close to facing disbarment, for launching frivolous law suits.

Yet no voter fraud uncovered, except for a few minor cases, not enough to sway the balance of the outcome.

I am not sure who picks dumber hills to die on, wrongway, or HisArpy....well I have to give the honour to wrongway, because he is just a peice of shit.

Oh look Fuzzy must have taken me off Iggy, in order to demonstrate, once again, his lack of reading comprehension. Mark Davis made the claim. I didn't. Oh and according to Fuzzy it just can't be correct, because Fuzzy knows more than anyone about the subject.

PS: For the record, Fuzzy's long extinct bone fides as a chronicler of reality died on a dunghill, long ago.

 

[Rotadom]

Well he is well known, and in possession of the official databases.

Where are his official findings that have been filed and accepted, prompting an investigation that led to proof of what you're saying?

 

[ll74]

Well he is well known, and in possession of the official databases.

Well of course you believe that he does, but even if he does, what information is he using and how is he using it to arrive at that conclusion. From his statements, he already has demonstrated bias towards Trump. Most likely, he is making an assumption about the data which is not true. (i.e. people reporting they moved incorrectly or late)

He can report it to the state who can then address it, or, as is the case here, make a stink about it in the media to get dipshits like you riled up.

 

[pecksniff]

In fact, it is very hard to believe Barr would have blocked publication of any actual evidence of voter fraud.

 

[pecksniff]

Well he is well known, and in possession of the official databases.

That does not guarantee his honesty.

 

[Rightguide]

That does not guarantee his honesty.

He's also a professional expert witness. He couldn't be if his credibility was easily undermined. He says that as we speak there is corroborating evidence that at least 35,000 Georgia votes can be thrown out. Which is more than enough to turn the election result.

 

[ll74]

Well of course you believe that he does, but even if he does, what information is he using and how is he using it to arrive at that conclusion. From his statements, he already has demonstrated bias towards Trump. Most likely, he is making an assumption about the data which is not true. (i.e. people reporting they moved incorrectly or late)

He can report it to the state who can then address it, or, as is the case here, make a stink about it in the media to get dipshits like you riled up.

Alright, after the above speculation, some other discussion points more succinct to the data being reported rather than the reporter of said data:

1. There is no indication of who the votes were for. In order to properly extrapolate any rough idea, you'd need to collect past election data where the same situation occurred. Without that, you can truly only guess a 50/50 split. Throw them out and the results are the same.
2. Why did voters data indicate address discrepencies. System error? Process lag? Voter lag on updating? Does GA treat those types differently? Past election data is needed. If it was the process or system, the vote should count, as the voter was not at fault. If it was voter error, throw them out. Again, without more information, 50/50 split, results unchanged.

 

[pecksniff]

In fact, it is very hard to believe Barr would have blocked publication of any actual evidence of voter fraud.

Really, what motive is being ascribed to him here?

 

[phrodeau]

Mark Davis’ affidavit on apparent voter migration in Georgia, filled with suppositions, and recommending a federal voter database: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/affidavit-mark-alan-davis-mark-davis

 

[Rightguide]

Really, what motive is being ascribed to him here?

It was the end of his term and was probably wetting his pants over the prospect of losing his Swamp Ticket and having to live out his life in DC.

 

[DeluxAuto]

It was the end of his term and was probably wetting his pants over the prospect of losing his Swamp Ticket and having to live out his life in DC.

Any proof yet

 

[pecksniff]

It was the end of his term and was probably wetting his pants over the prospect of losing his Swamp Ticket and having to live out his life in DC.

Would not his personal prospects, then, be better if Trump had won?