There isn't really any voter fraud

pecksniff

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Posts
22,077
The GOP has been hunting for it since the W Admin and come up dry. (Some US Attorneys were fired for failing to find it.) Sometimes an instance does pop up, like somebody voting in the name of a dead parent, but it never amounts to anything that could change an election result.

So can everybody please shut up about it, and drop all this legislation purportedly intended to stop it?
 
Tell New Yorkers and AZ that.

There was no fraud in either state. In NY, the BOE made the initial mistake of adding pre-election test ballots to the vote count, but that had nothing to do with any voter voting fraudulently.

And I'm surprised even you are not too ashamed to bring up AZ. You should be.
 
I do hope we can all agree, at any rate, that maximizing voter turnout is a basic, nonpartisan civic imperative.
 
I do hope we can all agree, at any rate, that maximizing voter turnout is a basic, nonpartisan civic imperative.

Not to the point of unqualified voters gaining access to the polls, or to the point of illegal ballots being counted.
 
i beg to differ-there have been several reported cases of republican voter fraud.
 
The GOP has been hunting for it since the W Admin and come up dry. (Some US Attorneys were fired for failing to find it.) Sometimes an instance does pop up, like somebody voting in the name of a dead parent, but it never amounts to anything that could change an election result.

So can everybody please shut up about it, and drop all this legislation purportedly intended to stop it?

There is voter fraud, in every election. The dispute is more about the evidence of fraud as well as the scope of the fraud.

Oversimiplificatiion and generalizations are not helpful for anyone
 
The GOP has been hunting for it since the W Admin and come up dry. (Some US Attorneys were fired for failing to find it.) Sometimes an instance does pop up, like somebody voting in the name of a dead parent, but it never amounts to anything that could change an election result.

So can everybody please shut up about it, and drop all this legislation purportedly intended to stop it?

How have you racked up over 2000 posts in a month?
 
There is voter fraud, in every election. The dispute is more about the evidence of fraud as well as the scope of the fraud.

There is no evidence that the scope is sufficient to make it a cause of concern. It doesn't change election results. It's statistically insignificant. It does not require preventive legislation.
 
And on that note, can we please now see no more asterisks or scare-quotes associated with Biden's name? He is president fair and square.
 
reality

just by way of a reality check

in the event, you or any other naysayer actually cared and wanted to know.....****dy Giuliani presented tons of direct evidence in court hearings in every swing state about voting fraud.....the evidence was real, proven, documented nine ways to sunday......it included direct testimony from various people who actually committed the crimes associated with taking away legal ballots or with injecting illegal ballots

furthermore, the evidence relating to Dominion, the design of the machines, the software running on them, and their intended purpose is fully documented and well known. millions of votes were changed inside dominion voting machines. it is a proven fact. furthermore just as an example, for people such as yourself, in the state of GA an 11 year old girl hacked into a dominion voting machine and changed the votes in the machine ON THE NEWS USING HER CELL PHONE. this is a documented fact.

and so, the situation remains that a faction of very powerful people in this country have perpetrated the greatest fraud ever to install the most unqualified person ever into the presidency with the sheer intent of further dividing this country and doing their best to cancel the way of life that separates this great country from the many others on earth.

as with biblical truths, and other absolute truths, your opinion is irrelevant as to the actual facts of the case. a third grader can discern what is actual versus what is contrived propaganda. sometimes it is simply as logical as how it could be that 10s of thousands always waited for hours if not days to hear President Trump whereas china joe could rarely get more than 20 people to attend his rallies. Occam's Razer simply prevails.
 
just by way of a reality check

in the event, you or any other naysayer actually cared and wanted to know.....****dy Giuliani presented tons of direct evidence in court hearings in every swing state about voting fraud.....the evidence was real, proven, documented nine ways to sunday......it included direct testimony from various people who actually committed the crimes associated with taking away legal ballots or with injecting illegal ballots

furthermore, the evidence relating to Dominion, the design of the machines, the software running on them, and their intended purpose is fully documented and well known. millions of votes were changed inside dominion voting machines. it is a proven fact. furthermore just as an example, for people such as yourself, in the state of GA an 11 year old girl hacked into a dominion voting machine and changed the votes in the machine ON THE NEWS USING HER CELL PHONE. this is a documented fact.

and so, the situation remains that a faction of very powerful people in this country have perpetrated the greatest fraud ever to install the most unqualified person ever into the presidency with the sheer intent of further dividing this country and doing their best to cancel the way of life that separates this great country from the many others on earth.

as with biblical truths, and other absolute truths, your opinion is irrelevant as to the actual facts of the case. a third grader can discern what is actual versus what is contrived propaganda. sometimes it is simply as logical as how it could be that 10s of thousands always waited for hours if not days to hear President Trump whereas china joe could rarely get more than 20 people to attend his rallies. Occam's Razer simply prevails.

Do you have cites for any of this?
 
Back
Top