With Friends Like Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema Who Needs

bodysong

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Posts
7,261
With Friends Like Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema Who Needs...

formery-Republicans for enemies ?

bodysong comment - Congratulations to Trump's tech bros.

The idea to use photoshop on Trump's pants was brilliant. Crude and fast job.

Instead of awakening America to the dangers of voting for the wrong person,
the Internet is still having arguments about Trump's pants.

The best leaks came from Trump himself (while he screamed about leaks on TV.)
The best funny memes on Trump came from the inside. (Democrats were accused.)

Not as if Trump has any dignity to protect. Scraping bottom is not too low for him.
(But he will scream about being a victim.)

The view is blocked by MAGA smog.

Joe Biden is doing just fine.

Jonathan Chait ✓
Twitter › jonathanchait

Manchin's argument makes no sense even on its own terms

(link to Intelligencer via NYmag)

1 hour ago

Joe Manchin's position will allow Republicans to "destroy" democracy,
argues Joe Manchin

3 hours ago

Joe Manchin's utterly incoherent argument for letting the GOP destroy democracy

4 hours ago
 
gee when Cheney turned against her party you called her statesman like

when your side turns statesman you attack em

HIPPO CREEP
 
WV and Ariz DINO's are supporting Moscow Mitch much more than Old Handsome Joe. They support obstruction and authoritarianism. They are not Democrats at all and should be called DINO's in every press release and news story. That will show them how much the country thinks of them.

Even Chris Wallace called bullshit on Manchin's support of the filibuster!:mad:
 
WV and Ariz DINO's are supporting Moscow Mitch much more than Old Handsome Joe. They support obstruction and authoritarianism. They are not Democrats at all and should be called DINO's in every press release and news story. That will show them how much the country thinks of them.

Even Chris Wallace called bullshit on Manchin's support of the filibuster!:mad:

John Dickerson clowned Manchin on Face the Nation this past Sunday.

He pointed out that Manchin is facilitating republican obstruction, and Manchin just sputtered like a old lawnmower.

SAD!!!
 
"Progressive" in American political discourse refers to a current well to the left of "liberal" and well to the right of "socialist." It is what in Europe would be called "social democracy," a term which has never had much traction here. It is also better than any other current in American politics.

Progressive is becoming synonymous with socialist, and no it is not better. Any position to seeks to limit the liberties of Americans is a terrible ideology. Libertarianism with it's focus on liberty is a much better way to go.
 
WV and Ariz DINO's are supporting Moscow Mitch much more than Old Handsome Joe. They support obstruction and authoritarianism. They are not Democrats at all and should be called DINO's in every press release and news story. That will show them how much the country thinks of them.

Even Chris Wallace called bullshit on Manchin's support of the filibuster!:mad:

Without Manchin, WVa would be red and Republicans would have the Senate.

They could easily take out some of that bill and find one Manchin would support, imo. Just focus on gerrymandering reform, automatic voter registration, voter roll removal regulations and state election funding. (probably one or two more)

I don't support getting rid of the filibuster.
 
What I don't get about Manchin's opposition to HR 1 is that it isn't based in any way on the substance of the legislation. His entire reasoning for being against it is "all the Republicans are against it, so that makes it a partisan bill."

Meanwhile, the number of Republicans in the Senate who would ever be against anything Mitch McConnell wants on the grounds of unanimous Democratic opposition is exactly zero. Which is fine; nothing wrong with the majority getting its way.

Unless you're Manchin, I guess.
 
HR! == S1 == DOA

Thanks, Joe, thanks Kyrsten. Your votes are principled and correct. Don't fell in with the totalitarians in your party.
 
Progressive is becoming synonymous with socialist, and no it is not better. Any position to seeks to limit the liberties of Americans is a terrible ideology. Libertarianism with it's focus on liberty is a much better way to go.


So are you in favor of a private business being able to require a so-called vaccine passport, or are you OK with the long reach of the government restricting a business from doing this?
 
Progressive is becoming synonymous with socialist, and no it is not better. Any position to seeks to limit the liberties of Americans is a terrible ideology. Libertarianism with it's focus on liberty is a much better way to go.

Economic libertarianism never leads to anything good.
 
So are you in favor of a private business being able to require a so-called vaccine passport, or are you OK with the long reach of the government restricting a business from doing this?

You were ok with the government deciding what businesses were allowed to stay open and which ones had to close. You don't get to make that argument now.
 
HR! == S1 == DOA

Thanks, Joe, thanks Kyrsten. Your votes are principled and correct. Don't fell in with the totalitarians in your party.

It's a waste of time. The bill would never survive a constitutional challenge. This is why we get the government we deserve. They keep the masses busy with things they really have no intentions of passing and they know will never hold up in court.
 
Back
Top