Biden's massive budget proposal, largest since WWII

[icanhelp1]

80 billion dollar increase for IRS: can you say Lois G Lerner 2.0

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...roposal-leaves-the-nation-fiscally-vulnerable


TheHill.com
One had to wonder how serious the White House was about their budget when they released it at the very moment everyone was heading out of town for a long-overdue three-day weekend. Questionable timing aside, budgets are a statement of an administration’s priorities, and there is a lot to learn from this one.


Perhaps most notable is the very significant growth in the size and reach of government. The budget includes roughly $5 trillion in new spending and targeted tax breaks over the decade to reflect President Biden’s proposed American Jobs Plan ($2.6 trillion), American Families Plan ($1.7 trillion) and discretionary spending increases ($600 billion).

 

[Lazaran]

.
Along with the republicans tax cuts for the rich and corporations over the decades, they have also gutted the IRS, which has allowed deadbeat deplorables to starve the government of revenue, and has resulted in artificially inflated deficits..

The traitor in chief in the poster child reason for beefing up the IRS compliance, collection, and enforcement capabilities.

Is it any wonder deadbeat deplorables love the traitor in chief???

 

[icanhelp1]

.
Along with the republicans tax cuts for the rich and corporations over the decades, they have also gutted the IRS, which has allowed deadbeat deplorables to starve the government of revenue, and has resulted in artificially inflated deficits..

The traitor in chief in the poster child reason for beefing up the IRS compliance, collection, and enforcement capabilities.

Is it any wonder deadbeat deplorables love the traitor in chief???

What we need is smaller government and to keep more of our hard earned money.

*STARVE GOVERNMENT OF REVENUE* That's the stupidest post I ever read!!

 

[Lazaran]

.
ineedhelp1 must have never heard of the GOP strategy referred to as "Starve the beast".

Then again, ineedhelp1 is so ignorant that the fool thought the Nordstream 2 pipeline was operational, so.......

 

[Cubantripod]

.
Along with the republicans tax cuts for the rich and corporations over the decades, they have also gutted the IRS, which has allowed deadbeat deplorables to starve the government of revenue, and has resulted in artificially inflated deficits..

The traitor in chief in the poster child reason for beefing up the IRS compliance, collection, and enforcement capabilities.

Is it any wonder deadbeat deplorables love the traitor in chief???

Tax cuts and tax increases have not had much of an effect on tax revenues. Tax revenues have remained fairly consistent since WWII at just under 20%. We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem.

https://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2019/01/hausers-law-updated-for-2019.html#.YL0zfi2z2gQ

 

[ll74]

80 billion dollar increase for IRS: can you say Lois G Lerner 2.0

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...roposal-leaves-the-nation-fiscally-vulnerable


TheHill.com
One had to wonder how serious the White House was about their budget when they released it at the very moment everyone was heading out of town for a long-overdue three-day weekend. Questionable timing aside, budgets are a statement of an administration’s priorities, and there is a lot to learn from this one.


Perhaps most notable is the very significant growth in the size and reach of government. The budget includes roughly $5 trillion in new spending and targeted tax breaks over the decade to reflect President Biden’s proposed American Jobs Plan ($2.6 trillion), American Families Plan ($1.7 trillion) and discretionary spending increases ($600 billion).

It's big because they haven't actually had a budget for the last two decades. When bridges and roads aren't. Taken care of and when the economical backbone which allow the economy to run efficiently have fallen behind, you need to do something.

Deficit hawks are idiots. They believe that the way they balance their checkbook is the way the world economy works....in reality, economists make up negative interest and things that allow them to accepy new ways of thinking.

The bottom line is that capitalism can't work without employees. And if your employees have obstacles to work, then your lose them. Do you favor a business, which is not a person...or a employee who is?

 

[icanhelp1]

It's a good strategy!

I accused Biden of taking off sanctions and allowing it to open unimpeded, I don't recall posting it was already completed and open.

 

[Lazaran]

.
ineedhelp1 claimed the Nordstream 2 pipeline was "up and running".

Fucking clown.

*nods*

 

[Rightguide]

80 billion dollar increase for IRS: can you say Lois G Lerner 2.0

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...roposal-leaves-the-nation-fiscally-vulnerable


TheHill.com
One had to wonder how serious the White House was about their budget when they released it at the very moment everyone was heading out of town for a long-overdue three-day weekend. Questionable timing aside, budgets are a statement of an administration’s priorities, and there is a lot to learn from this one.


Perhaps most notable is the very significant growth in the size and reach of government. The budget includes roughly $5 trillion in new spending and targeted tax breaks over the decade to reflect President Biden’s proposed American Jobs Plan ($2.6 trillion), American Families Plan ($1.7 trillion) and discretionary spending increases ($600 billion).

a 22% increase for the EPA and a 1.6% increase for the military over ten years...which is way below the inflation rate. This is Biden making sure the Russians, Chinese, and the Iranians, have a leg up in the next war.

 

[Lazaran]

.
RotGut = Histrionic alarmist.

*nods*

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Anything over 18-19% of GDP is wasteful. Revenues will never exceed that, so why spend more?

 

[CornusKousa]

The bottom line is that capitalism can't work without employees.

Not even.

Capitalism works just fine without them, so good the (D)'s in California had to assassinate their gig economy.

Can't let regular people have any right to their own labor in the land of "progress".

Capitalism can't work with an oppressive control freak government doing all it can to stifle commerce.

And if your employees have obstacles to work, then your lose them.

Lots of folks out there.

They can be replaced.

Do you favor a business, which is not a person...or a employee who is?

Businesses are people.

 

[CornusKousa]

Anything over 18-19% of GDP is wasteful. Revenues will never exceed that, so why spend more?

To be wasteful, and devalue your money.

 

[ll74]

Not even.

Capitalism works just fine without them, so good the (D)'s in California had to assassinate their gig economy.

Can't let regular people have any right to their own labor in the land of "progress".

Capitalism can't work with an oppressive control freak government doing all it can to stifle commerce.



Lots of folks out there.

They can be replaced.



Businesses are people.

Lol..this entire line is fun
As a worker, if you can't afford things at your job...what do you do?

You can always complain about inflation..but no worker has a reason to work if the salary they make doesn't afford them anything. Businesses have more control over prices than workers do...yet you assholes continue to blame workers without even a little bit of logic.

Business will fail without employees..your entire narrative is that they can be replaced...

Dipshit.

 

[icanhelp1]

Lol..this entire line is fun

As a worker, if you can't afford things at your job...what do you do?

You get another job, make yourself more valuable!

You can always complain about inflation..but no worker has a reason to work if the salary they make doesn't afford them anything. Businesses have more control over prices than workers do...yet you assholes continue to blame workers without even a little bit of logic.

No-one is blaming workers, but workers need to hold themselves accountable for their own wellbeing. The government is not responsible for individual wealth or happiness, only providing equal opportunity under the law.

Business will fail without employees..your entire narrative is that they can be replaced...

And markets determine what's acceptable compensation.

 

[ll74]

Lol..this entire line is fun


You get another job, make yourself more valuable!



No-one is blaming workers, but workers need to hold themselves accountable for their own wellbeing. The government is not responsible for individual wealth or happiness, only providing equal opportunity under the law.



And markets determine what's acceptable compensation.

Sono one is blaming workers yet everyone seems to be thinking they don't want to work because of the government. And certainly seems to be a thing that wages going up are partlt their fault...and them wanting a higher wage is also their fault.

 

[CornusKousa]

Lol..this entire line is fun
As a worker, if you can't afford things at your job...what do you do?

Stop living above my means, get a better job, invest, start my own bidnizz.

Or if I live in a blue state I just get on welfare and say "fuck it" because anything else is either illegal or doesn't make any sense.

You can always complain about inflation..but no worker has a reason to work if the salary they make doesn't afford them anything.

It affords them the same as my income affords me.....all dollars spend the same.

They don't have a reason to work because the welfare state provides for them.

Businesses have more control over prices than workers do...yet you assholes continue to blame workers without even a little bit of logic.

It's not the workers, it's the government.

Take the welfare away, they'll get hungry and go to work.

Business will fail without employees.

.your entire narrative is that they can be replaced...

Dipshit.

Depends on the business, that's not a narrative, that's a fact.

At least until socialist control freaks like yourself fuck the economy to death and make it impossible to do so.

 

[ll74]

Stop living above my means, get a better job, invest, start my own bidnizz.



It affords them the same as my income affords me.....all dollars spend the same.

They don't have a reason to work because the welfare state provides for them.



It's not the workers, it's the government.

Take the welfare away, they'll get hungry and go to work.



Depends on the business, that's not a narrative, that's a fact.

At least until socialist control freaks like yourself fuck the economy to death and make it impossible to do so.

Yes, I get it...blame the worker.

 

[ll74]

If everything that needs to be done to solve the job market is on the employee...the. You're literally blaming the worker. The government provides unemployment, which you seem to hate...because it forces employers to pay their workers enough to afford actual things instead of focusing on their businesses...which you say is employees, but you also say is expendable.

 

[icanhelp1]

Sono one is blaming workers yet everyone seems to be thinking they don't want to work because of the government.

The government is providing compensation well above their normal compensatory rate. If I was making more being out of work then it's only common sense to ride the gravy train, don't need an MBA to figure that out. That gravy train is a disincentive to return to work.

And certainly seems to be a thing that wages going up are partlt their fault...and them wanting a higher wage is also their fault.

God gave you a brain, use it! You want to make more money? You have freedom of choice, make changes in your life.

 

[ll74]

The government is providing compensation well above their normal compensatory rate. If I was making more being out of work then it's only common sense to ride the gravy train, don't need an MBA to figure that out. That gravy train is a disincentive to return to work.



God gave you a brain, use it! You want to make more money? You have freedom of choice, make changes in your life.

They aren't. Workers normally also have money for insurance, retirement..etc.

If you aren't paying your workers enough...that's your fault. The government is providing funds from workers who pay into it to workers that need it. Don't like it
..pay more

 

[CornusKousa]

Yes, I get it...blame the worker.

I directly said the exact opposite, learn to read.

It's not the workers, it's the government.

Again, it's not the worker.

If everything that needs to be done to solve the job market is on the employee...the. You're literally blaming the worker.

You are the only person saying that.

You made up your own argument to be mad at while actively ignoring what people are actually posting.

Congrats, you're a fine example and testament to the mentality of a good comrade.

 

[Rightguide]

Anything over 18-19% of GDP is wasteful. Revenues will never exceed that, so why spend more?

These agencies still have billions upon billions of remaining stimulus funds they haven't spent yet. It isn't as if their need for funds is so immediate it can't be properly debated in public.

 

[ll74]

I directly said the exact opposite, learn to read.



Again, it's not the worker.



You are the only person saying that.

You made up your own argument to be mad at while actively ignoring what people are actually posting.

Congrats, you're a fine example and testament to the mentality of a good comrade.

The worker who you said needs to get their shit together for value to the company?......oh right

And now we're back to your generalization....didn't take long..have to bring up communism to support the narrative

 

[CornusKousa]

The worker who you said needs to get their shit together for value to the company?......oh right

I never said anything of the sort, you're just making shit up now

And now we're back to your generalization....didn't take long..have to bring up communism to support the narrative

Behave like a good comrade don't get mad when people laugh at you for it

At least I'm not just making random shit up, in direct contradiction to what was actually posted no less.