It Ain't About The Hands And Feet Ladies, It's The Size Of The Nose!

[gordo12]

I had to wonder if it was April Fool

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/me...ording-to-new-study/ar-BB1gvvCR?ocid=msedgntp

 

[HeyAll]

"The team of researchers drew this conclusion by looking at the dead corpses of 126 men within three days of death and measured different parts of their body. "

That's not very nice.

But I've always thought handsize was the more accurate indicator.

 

[gordo12]

But I've always thought handsize was the more accurate indicator.

I never knew whether the big hands or big feet things were just rumours. I was surprised as hell to read that article.

Big-nose Harry has a whole new lease on life!

 

[LexxRuthless]

Yeah....this so-called "research" was cooked up by this guy:

https://as1.ftcdn.net/jpg/01/43/04/58/500_F_143045840_RU9Qs3MtYU4yaEw9DuUvFfAqm9E5YyMq.jpg

 

[CyranoJ]

Small, my nose? Magnificent, my nose! Know that I glory in this nose of mine!

 

[ElectricBlue]

But I've always thought handsize was the more accurate indicator.

The spread from thumb tip to index fingertip is spot on, in my case.

 

[lovecraft68]

And the ladies say, Tell me another one Pinocchio!

 

[MelissaBaby]

"The team of researchers drew this conclusion by looking at the dead corpses of 126 men within three days of death and measured different parts of their body. "

That's not very nice.

But I've always thought handsize was the more accurate indicator.

The flaw in the study is that there is no way to differentiate if the deceased was a shower or a grower.

 

[MelissaBaby]

And the ladies say, Tell me another one Pinocchio!

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/001/668/293/2d3.jpg

 

[DanDraper]

This doesn't seem accurate at all. Mainly because they only looked 126 men, that's a small subset to analyze. When you see something common between a small group of people, you could find some commonality between them, especially if those people were from the same area.

Like in most studies, for more accuracy, you need a wider range to analyze. You need to see it from those in the thousands (and in some cases, they need to be in the millions), and to analyze it from wider locations not just within one area. This gives you a better result.

Also, another reason this doesn't make sense is if you look at male pornstars. I think we would notice that the ones with larger penises, also have larger noses. It's one of those features in people we can't help noticing.

 

[Zeb_Carter]

I do see a problem with this, it only works for dead guys, as the human nose continues to grow throughout your life. Where as your hands stop growing, along with your feet and the rest of your body, except your ears.

So, at age 40, you might have a nose length the would produce an 8" erect penis, yet at age 60 you now have a nose that would produce a 10" erect penis, yet you only have an 8" erect penis.

And just think about your childhood, where you nose length would produce only a 4" erect penis, yet you have a 6" erect penis.

So at some point in your life you will have a nose that has to catch up with your penis and then a nose that has grown so that you think your penis is small compared to your nose.

 

[lovecraft68]

I never think about this. Never measure it like an immature idiot and never worried about it.

No woman has ever said "Oh my god, get that thing away from me" nor have I ever been asked if its in yet.

So I'm content to not be concerned about size like I'm 14

 

[jehoram]

The flaw in the study is that there is no way to differentiate if the deceased was a shower or a grower.

They did say that the penis was stretched "as far as it would go" but as a grower myself, I wouldn't say that that was very accurate. Anyway, I'm content with having a remorselessly normally sized erection, right in the middle of the spectrum.

 

[jaF0]

https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-my-nose-isn-t-big-i-just-happen-to-have-a-very-small-head-jimmy-durante-104-83-31.jpg


'Course, it doesn't say WHICH head.




Ba-da-da-bumph- ssssshh.

 

[Trionyx]

After embalming...

Penises are huge but not erect. Many years ago I knew a fairly naive freshman female medical student who came out of the anatomy lab totally shocked and believing all men were so well endowed. I’ve often wondered how disappointed (or relieved?) she might have been when she saw her first live one.

 

[MelissaBaby]

Penises are huge but not erect. Many years ago I knew a fairly naive freshman female medical student who came out of the anatomy lab totally shocked and believing all men were so well endowed. I’ve often wondered how disappointed (or relieved?) she might have been when she saw her first live one.

Him: "Is mine the biggest you ever saw?"

Her:"No dear, but all the others were dead, so you've got that going for you."

 

[lovecraft68]

Him: "Is mine the biggest you ever saw?"

Her:"No dear, but all the others were dead, so you've got that going for you."

I would say "Maybe, but you have some stiff competition"

I'll see my way out...

 

[gordo12]

I would say "Maybe, but you have some stiff competition"

I'll see my way out...

Yeah, whatever happened to good old rigor mortis when you need it?

 

[lovecraft68]

Yeah, whatever happened to good old rigor mortis when you need it?

In their case having an erection for more than four hours won't be a problem.

 

[Tio_Narratore]

If the study is serious, the methodology makes it worthless. Death produces some significant changes in soft tissue within hours. Stretching the penis to measure introduces too much opportunity for observer/researcher bias. The sample is, as noted, much too small for significant statistical inference. The study is, in effect, useless, so don't go looking for big noses if you want to find a big penis. An expansive, well-controlled British research project a number of years ago found no correlation between penis size and any other organ size. The lead researcher was very disappointed over not having found any correlation between penis and more public organ sizes. He didn't indicate the reason for his disappointment.

By the way, noses do not continue to grow as you age. Your facial tissue looses fat and moisture, so your nose may appear to be slightly larger as you get very old.

 

[Zeb_Carter]

If the study is serious, the methodology makes it worthless. Death produces some significant changes in soft tissue within hours. Stretching the penis to measure introduces too much opportunity for observer/researcher bias. The sample is, as noted, much too small for significant statistical inference. The study is, in effect, useless, so don't go looking for big noses if you want to find a big penis. An expansive, well-controlled British research project a number of years ago found no correlation between penis size and any other organ size. The lead researcher was very disappointed over not having found any correlation between penis and more public organ sizes. He didn't indicate the reason for his disappointment.

By the way, noses do not continue to grow as you age. Your facial tissue looses fat and moisture, so your nose may appear to be slightly larger as you get very old.

Well, gee, my nose is now at least 5 times the size it was when I was 5.

 

[JanusGoneAwry]

As someone with a big nose (according to social commentary) and an average size member (statistics), I can confirm that a large proboscis has its advantages when going down on a woman.

 

[TadOverdon]

Where's the assumption that it's mainly the ladies who are interested in gauging dick size coming from?

 

[MelissaBaby]

Penises are like the school children in Lake Woebegone. Every one is above average.

 

[NotWise]

Where's the assumption that it's mainly the ladies who are interested in gauging dick size coming from?

Maybe from guys trying to rationalize their obsession.